Skip to main content
Log in

Gaze behaviour in hereditary prosopagnosia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prosopagnosia is the inability to recognize someone by the face alone in the absence of sensory or intellectual impairment. In contrast to the acquired form of prosopagnosia we studied the congenital form. Since we could recently show that this form is inherited as a simple monogenic trait we called it hereditary form. To determine whether not only face recognition and neuronal processing but also the perceptual acquisition of facial information is specific to prosopagnosia, we studied the gaze behaviour of four hereditary prosopagnosics in comparison to matched control subjects. This rarely studied form of prosopagnosia ensures that deficits are limited to face recognition. Whereas the control participants focused their gaze on the central facial features, the hereditary prosopagnosics showed a significantly different gaze behaviour. They had a more dispersed gaze and also fixated external facial features. Thus, the face recognition impairment of the hereditary prosopagnosics is reflected in their gaze behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antes, J. R. (1974). The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 62–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ariel, R., & Sadeh, M. (1996). Congenital visual agnosia and prosopagnosia in a child: A case report. Cortex, 32, 221–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, J. J. S., Press, D. Z., Keenan, J. P., & O’Connor, M. (2002). Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology, 58, 71–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., Deouell, L. Y., & Soroker, N. (1999). Selective visual streaming in face recognition: Evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. Neuroreport, 10, 823–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behrmann, M., & Avidan, G. (2005). Congenital prosopagnosia: Face-blind from birth. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, A. (1990). Facial recognition. Cortex, 26, 491–499.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bodamer, J. (1947). Die Prosop-Agnosie. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 179, 6–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V. (1988). Recognizing faces. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1998). In the eye of the beholder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., Walker, J., & Baron, C. S. (1995). The development of differential use of inner and outer face features in familiar face identification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1996). Perceptual classification and expertise. In R. Gelman, & T. Kit-Fong Au (Eds.). Perceptual and cognitive development (pp. 49–69). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, D. P., Nodine, C. F., & Kundel, H. L. (1980). Global and segmented search for lung nodules of different edge gradients. Investigative Radiology, 15, 224–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choisser, B. http://www.choisser.com/faceblind/.

  • De Gelder, B., & Rouw, R. (2000). Configural face processes in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence for two seperate face systems? Neuroreport, 11, 3145–3150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, E. H. F. (1999). A familial factor in the development of face recognition deficits. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 312–315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, E. H., & Campbell, R. (1991). A fifteen year follow-up of a case of developmental prosopagnosia. Cortex, 27(4), 489–509.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duchaine, B. C. (2000). Developmental prosopagnosia with normal configural processing. Neuroreport, 11, 79–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duchaine, B. C., Parker, H., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Normal recognition of emotion in a prosopagnosic. Perception, 32, 827–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grüter, M. (2004). Genetik der Prosopagnosie. Dissertation. Rheinisch Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany.

  • Grüter, M., Grüter, T., Bell, V., Horst, J., Laskowski, W., Sperling, K., et al. (in press). Hereditary prosopagnosia: The first case series. Cortex.

  • Hadjikhani, N., & De Gelder, B. (2002). Neural basis of prosopagnosia: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 16, 176–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson, U., Avidan, G., Deouell, L., Bentin, S., & Malach, R. (2003). Face-selective activation in a congenital prosopagnosic subject. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 419–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M., Falk, R., Minut, S., Dyer, F. C., & Mahadevan, S. (2001). Gaze control for face learning and recognition in humans, machines. In T. Shipley & P. Kellman (Eds.) From fragments to objects: Segmentation processes in vision (pp. 463–481). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janik, S. W., Wellens, A. R., Goldberg, M. L., & Dell’Osso, L. F. (1978). Eyes as the center of focus in the visual examination of human faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 857–858.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. D., & Tranel, D. (2001). Severe developmental prosopagnosia in a child with superior intellect. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 265–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennerknecht, I., Grüter, M., Grüter, T., Otte, S., Neumann T., Meyer B., et al. (2002). First report on the genetics of prosopagnosia. European Journal of Human Genetics, 10(Suppl. 1), 249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, T., & Daum, I. (2003). Event-related potentials reflect impaired face recognition in patients with congenital prosopagnosia. Neuroscience Letters, 352, 133–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kundel, H. L., & Nodine, C. F. (1983). A visual concept shapes image perception. Radiology, 146, 363–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le, S., Raufaste, E., & Demonet, J. (2003). Processing of normal, inverted, and scrambled faces in a patient with prosopagnosia: behavioural and eye tracking data. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 26–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manor, B. R., Gordon, E., Williams, L. M., Rennie, C. J., Bahramali, H., Latimer C. R., et al. (1999). Eye movements reflect impaired face processing in patients with schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 963–969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McConachie, H. R. (1976). Developmental prosopagnosia: a single case report. Cortex, 12, 76–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, J. A., Postma, P., & Pearson, R. (2001). Developmental prosopagnosia: Should it be taken at face value? Neurocase, 7, 15–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, L. F., Simpson, D. M., & Nadal, J. (1996). Calculation of area of stabilometric signals using principal component analysis. Physiological Measurement, 17, 305–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelphrey, K. A., Sasson N. J., Reznick J. S., Paul G., Goldman B. D., & Piven J. (2002). Visual scanning of faces in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 249–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PICS. Psychological Image Collection at Stirling, University of Stirling, Psychology Department, http://www.pics.psych.stir.ac.uk/ (access May 2002).

  • Rizzo, M., Hurtig, R., & Damasio, A. R. (1987). The role of scanpaths in facial recognition and learning. Annals of Neurology, 22, 41–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, G., Huber, S., & Dümmler, T. (2005). Gaze behaviour in analytical and holistic face processing. Memory & Cognition, 33, 344–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, L., & Ellis, S. R. (1981). Scanpath revisited: Cognitive models of direct active looking. In D. F. Fisher, R. A. Monty, & J. W. Senders (Eds.) Gaze behavior: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 193–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple C. M. (1992). Developmental memory impairment: faces and patterns. In R. Campbell (Ed.). Mental lives: case studies in cognition (pp. 199–215). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P. (1990). Gaze behavior into visual search. Cognitive, perceptual and motor control aspects. In E. Kowler (Ed.). Gaze behavior and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 353–393). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker-Smith, G. J., Gale, A. G., & Findlay, J. M. (1977). Eye movement strategies involved in face perception. Perception, 6, 313–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gudrun Schwarzer.

Appendix

Appendix

Faces used in the famous face task

  • Boris Becker

  • Norbert Blüm

  • George Bush

  • Sabine Christiansen

  • Bill Clinton

  • Gerard Depardieu

  • Lady Diana

  • Albert Einstein

  • Joschka Fischer

  • Greta Garbo

  • Thomas Gottschalk

  • Günther Grass

  • Gregor Gysi

  • Günther Jauch

  • Helmut Kohl

  • Oskar Lafontaine

  • Elvis Pressly

  • Claudia Roth

  • Gerhard Schröder

  • Ralf Schumacher

  • Jürgen Trittin

  • Theodor Waigel

  • Richard von Weizäcker

  • Ulrich Wickert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwarzer, G., Huber, S., Grüter, M. et al. Gaze behaviour in hereditary prosopagnosia. Psychological Research 71, 583–590 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0068-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0068-0

Keywords

Navigation