Skip to main content
Log in

The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The anticipative learning model for acquiring action-effect relations states that the acquisition of action-effect relations depends on processes that are part of action planning, in particular the anticipation of possible effects. Experiment 1 shows that response planning is indeed crucial for the learning of response effects. In this experiment distractors (tones) were presented either during response preparation or in the time interval between response execution and the presentation of a response effect. Response-effect learning was impaired when the distractors were presented during response preparation. The finding is consistent with the assumption that the distractors impaired the anticipation of potential effects and therefore reduced effect learning. In Experiment 2 all responses had two effects. Participants were instructed to produce one of the effects. Under this condition, response-effect learning was only found for the instructed effect, not for the non-instructed effect. The two experiments thus support the view that response-effect learning is selective and depends on the anticipation of potential effects during response planning. The results are discussed in terms of a model that explains both the learning of response-effect relations and the use of these effects for action control within the same theoretical framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., & Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coren, S. (1986). An efferent component in the visual perception of direction and extent. Psychological Review, 93, 391–410.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental-Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters on the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C.-D., Blakemore, S. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2000). Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Research Reviews, 31, 357–363.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, P., Aschersleben, G., Gehrke, J., & Prinz, W. (2002). Action, binding, and awareness. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Attention and Performance XIX. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

  • Herbart, J. F. (1825). Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik. Königsberg, Germany: August Wilhelm Unzer.

  • Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176–186.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.

  • Jordan, M. I. (1996). Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.). Handbook of perception and action, Vol. 2: Motor skills (pp. 71–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  • Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W., Hoffmann, J., & Zellmann, P. (2002). The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. Acta Psychologica, 109, 137–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medizinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig, Germany: Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung.

  • Münsterberg, H. (1888). Die Willenshandlung. Ein Beitrag zur physiologischen Psychologie [The intended act. A contribution to physiological psychology]. Freiburg, Germany: Mohr.

  • O’Regan, J. K., & Noe, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1031.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1953). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: Routledge.

  • Prinz, W. (1992). Why don’t we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W., Meinecke, C., & Hielscher, M. (1987). Effect of stimulus degradation on category search. Acta Psychologica, 64, 187–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, D. R. (1995). Is human learning rational? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 48A, 257–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, P. (1986). Saccadic exploration and perceptual-motor learning. Acta Psychologica, 63, 263–280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, P. (1999). Space perception and intended action. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.). Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events. Advances in psychology, 129 (pp. 43–63). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier Science.

  • Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahrmani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature: Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1217.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998). Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 338–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 595–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2002). Effect anticipation in action planning. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Attention and Performance XIX. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The experiments were supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to Peter A. Frensch within the Research Group “Bindung: Funktionale Architektur, neuronale Korrelate und Ontogenese (FOR 448). We thank Britta Bruland for her assistance in performing the experiments and Wilfried Kunde and Jochen Müsseler for their very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Ziessler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziessler, M., Nattkemper, D. & Frensch, P.A. The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions. Psychological Research 68, 163–175 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0153-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0153-6

Keywords

Navigation