Abstract
Main conclusion
Quantification of cuticular waxes coupled with insect bioassays and feeding behavior analysis demonstrate that long-chain C32 fatty alcohol impacts host plant selection by aphids.
Abstract
Cuticular waxes constitute the first point of contact between plants and their environment, and it also protect plants from external stresses. However, the role of waxes in Sorghum bicolor (sorghum) against sugarcane aphid (Melanaphis sacchari), a relatively new and devastating pest of sorghum in the U.S., is not fully understood. In this study, we monitored sugarcane aphid behavior on two genotypes of young sorghum plants with different wax chemistry: a wild-type plant (bloom) with lower C32 alcohol cuticular wax, and a mutant plant (bloomless) with 1.6 times the amount of wax compared to wild-type plants. No-choice aphid bioassays revealed that sugarcane aphid reproduction did not vary between wild-type and the bloomless plants. Electrical Penetration Graph (EPG) monitoring indicated that the sugarcane aphids spent comparable amount of time feeding from the sieve elements of the wild-type and bloomless plants. However, aphids spent more time feeding on the xylem sap of the bloomless plants compared to the wild-type plants. Furthermore, aphid choice assays revealed that the sugarcane aphids preferred to settle on bloomless compared to wild-type plants. Overall, our results suggest that cuticular waxes on young sorghum leaves play a critical role in influencing host plant selection by sugarcane aphids.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Adati T, Matsuda K (1993) Feeding stimulants for various leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in the leaf surface wax of their host plants. Appl Entomol Zool 28:319–324. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.28.319
Borodich FM, Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2010) Fracture behaviour of plant epicuticular wax crystals and its role in preventing insect attachment: a theoretical approach. Appl Phys A 100:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-010-5794-x
Bowling RD, Brewer MJ, Kerns DL, Gordy J, Seiter N, Elliott NE, Buntin GD, Way MO, Royer TA, Biles S, Maxson E (2016) Sugarcane aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae): A new pest on sorghum in North America. J Integr Pest Manag 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmw011
Busta L, Schmitz E, Kosma DK, Schnable JC, Cahoon EB (2021) A co-opted steroid synthesis gene, maintained in sorghum but not maize, is associated with a divergence in leaf wax chemistry. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 118:e2022982118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022982118
Cole RA, Riggall W (1992) Pleiotropic effects of genes in glossy Brassica oleracea resistant to Brevicoryne brassicae. In: Menken SBJ, Visser JH, Harrewijn P (eds) Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 313–315
EDDMapS (2022) Early detection & distribution mapping system. The University of Georgia - Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health. Available online at http://www.eddmaps.org/
Eigenbrode SD, Espelie KE (1995) Effects of plant epicuticular lipids on insect herbivores. Ann Rev Entomol 40:171–194. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001131
Espitia-Hernández P, Chávez González ML, Ascacio-Valdés JA, Dávila-Medina D, Flores-Naveda A, Silva T, Chacón Ruelas X, Sepúlveda L (2022) Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) as a potential source of bioactive substances and their biological properties. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 62:2269–2280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1852389
Friedemann K, Kunert G, Gorb E, Gorb SN, Beutel RG (2015) Attachment forces of pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) on different legume species. Ecol Entomol 40:732–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12249
Gorb E, Haas K, Henrich A, Enders S, Barbakadze N, Gorb S (2005) Composite structure of the crystalline epicuticular wax layer of the slippery zone in the pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata and its effect on insect attachment. J Exp Biol 208:4651–4662. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01939
Gorb EV, Gorb SN (2017) Anti-adhesive effects of plant wax coverage on insect attachment. J Exp Bot 68:5323–5337. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx271
Gorz HJ, Haskins FA, Johnson BE (1990) Registration of 15 germplasm lines of grain sorghum and sweet sorghum. Crop Sci 30:762–763. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000030089x
Grover S, Agpawa E, Sarath G, Sattler SE, Louis J (2020) Interplay of phytohormones facilitate sorghum tolerance to aphids. Plant Mol Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-020-01083-y
Grover S, Cardona JB, Zogli P, Alvarez S, Naldrett MJ, Sattler SE, Louis J (2022a) Reprogramming of sorghum proteome in response to sugarcane aphid infestation. Plant Sci 320:111289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111289
Grover S, Puri H, Xin Z, Sattler SE, Louis J (2022b) Dichotomous role of jasmonic acid in modulating sorghum defense against aphids. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 35:755–767. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-01-22-0005-R
Harris-Shultz K, Punnuri S, Knoll JE, Ni X, Wang H (2020) The sorghum epicuticular wax locus Bloomless2 reduces plant damage in P898012 caused by the sugarcane aphid. Agrosyst Geosci Environ 3:e20008. https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20008
Hashimoto S, Tezuka T, Yokoi S (2019) Morphological changes during juvenile-to-adult phase transition in sorghum. Planta 250:1557–1566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03251-x
McGinnis MJ, Painter JE (2020) Sorghum: History, use, and health benefits. Nutr Today 55:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/NT.0000000000000391
Mori M (1982) n-Hexacosanol and n-octacosanol: Feeding stimulants for larvae of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J Insect Physiol 28:969–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(82)90114-7
Nalam V, Louis J, Shah J (2019) Plant defense against aphids, the pest extraordinaire. Plant Sci 279:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.04.027
Nibouche S, Costet L, Holt JR, Jacobson A, Pekarcik A, Sadeyen J, Armstrong JS, Peterson GC, McLaren N, Medina RF (2018) Invasion of sorghum in the Americas by a new sugarcane aphid (Melanaphis sacchari) superclone. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196124
Peters PJ, Jenks MA, Rich PJ, Axtell JD, Ejeta G (2009) Mutagenesis, selection, and allelic analysis of epicuticular wax mutants in sorghum. Crop Sci 49:1250–1258. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0461
Peterson GC, Suksayretrup K, Weibel DE (1982) Inheritance of some bloomless and sparse-bloom mutants in sorghum. Crop Sci 22:63–67. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200010014x
Pompon J, Quiring D, Giordanengo P, Pelletier Y (2010) Role of xylem consumption on osmoregulation in Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas). J Insect Physiol 56:610–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.12.009
Punnuri S, Harris-Shultz K, Knoll J et al (2017) The Genes Bm2 and Blmc that affect epicuticular wax deposition in sorghum are allelic. Crop Sci 57:1552–1556. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.11.0937
Punnuri S, Huang Y (2017) Identification and confirmation of greenbug resistance loci in an advanced mapping population of sorghum. J Agric Sci 155:1610–1622. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859617000685
Rutledge CE, Eigenbrode SD (2003) Epicuticular wax on pea plants decreases instantaneous search rate of Hippodamia convergens larvae and reduces attachment to leaf surfaces. Can Entomol 135:93–101. https://doi.org/10.4039/n02-044
Singh BU, Padmaja PG, Seetharama N (2004) Biology and management of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner) (Homoptera: Aphididae), in sorghum: a review. Crop Prot 23:739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2004.01.004
Spiller NJ, Koenders L, Tjallingii WF (1990) Xylem ingestion by aphids–a strategy for maintaining water balance. Entomol Exp Appl 55:101–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1990.tb01352.x
Stamenković OS, Siliveru K, Veljković VB et al (2020) Production of biofuels from sorghum. Renew Sust Energ Rev 124:109769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109769
Starks KJ, Weibel DE (1981) Resistance in bloomless and sparse-bloom sorghum to greenbugs. Environ Entomol 10:963–965. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/10.6.963
Tetreault HM, Grover S, Scully ED, Gries T, Palmer NA, Sarath G, Louis J, Sattler SE (2019) Global responses of resistant and susceptible sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to sugarcane aphid (Melanaphis sacchari). Front Plant Sci 10:145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00145
Venkateswaran K, Elangovan M, Sivaraj N (2019) Chapter 2 - Origin, domestication and diffusion of Sorghum bicolor. In: Aruna C, Visarada KBRS, Bhat BV, Tonapi VA (eds) Breeding sorghum for diverse end uses. Woodhead Publishing, pp 15–31
Weibel DE, Starks KJ (1986) Greenbug nonpreference for bloomless sorghum. Crop Sci. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600060014x
Wójcicka A (2016) Effect of epicuticular waxes from triticale on the feeding behaviour and mortality of the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Plant Prot Res 56:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2016-0006
Yang Q, Van Haute M, Korth N et al (2022) Genetic analysis of seed traits in Sorghum bicolor that affect the human gut microbiome. Nat Commun 13:5641. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33419-1
Yeats TH, Rose JKC (2013) The formation and function of plant cuticles. Plant Physiol 163:5–20. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.222737
Zogli P, Pingault L, Grover S, Louis J (2020) Ento(o)mics: the intersection of ‘omic’ approaches to decipher plant defense against sap-sucking insect pests. Curr Opin Plant Biol 56:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2020.06.002
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge John Toy and several undergraduate students in Louis laboratory for help with greenhouse assistance. We also thank Dr. Kyle Koch for critically reading this manuscript.
Funding
L.B. acknowledges support in the form of a fellowship from the US National Science Foundation Plant Genome Research Program (NSF PRFB IOS-1812037) as well as support from the University of Minnesota Duluth in the form of startup funds. This work was partially supported by Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station-USDA Hatch Multistate Research capacity funding program (NEB-28–125) and US National Science Foundation CAREER grant IOS-1845588 awarded to J.L.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JBC and JL conceived the research. JBC, SG, LB, and JL designed experiments. JBC, SG, and LB conducted the experiments, and collected and analyzed the data. SES contributed reagents and provided guidance on experiments. JBC and JL wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Anastasios Melis.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardona, J.B., Grover, S., Busta, L. et al. Sorghum cuticular waxes influence host plant selection by aphids. Planta 257, 22 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-04046-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-04046-3