Abstract
Main conclusion
Differences in cell wall components between two BNF-contrasting sugarcane genotypes might result from genetic variations particular to the genotype and from the efficiency in diazotrophic bacteria association.
Abstract
Sugarcane is a plant of the grass family (Poaceae) that is highly cultivated in Brazil, as an important energy resource. Commercial sugarcane genotypes may be successfully associated with beneficial endophytic nitrogen-fixing bacteria, which can influence several plant metabolic pathways, such as cell division and growth, synthesis of hormones, and defense compounds. In this study, we investigated how diazotrophic bacteria associated with sugarcane plants could be involved in the regulation of cell wall formation pathways. A molecular and structural characterization of the cell wall was compared between two genotypes of sugarcane with contrasting rates of Biological Nitrogen Fixation (BNF): SP70-1143 (high BNF) and Chunee (low BNF). Differentially expressed transcripts were identified in transcriptomes generated from SP70-1143 and Chunee. Expression profiles of cellulose and lignin genes, which were more expressed in SP70-1134, and callose genes, which were more expressed in Chunee, were validated by RT-qPCR and microscopic analysis of cell wall components in tissue sections. A similar expression profile in both BNF-contrasting genotypes was observed in naturally colonized plants and in plants inoculated with G. diazotrophicus. Cell walls of the high BNF genotype have a greater cellulose content, which might contribute to increase biomass. In parallel, callose was concentrated in the vascular tissues of the low BNF genotype and could possibly represent a barrier for an efficient bacterial colonization and dissemination in sugarcane tissues. Our data show a correlation between the gene profiles identified in the BNF-contrasting genotypes and a successful association with endophytic diazotrophic bacteria.










Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Abbreviations
- BNF:
-
Biological nitrogen fixation
- DET:
-
Differentially expressed transcripts
References
Aquino JPA, Antunes JEL, Bonifácio A et al (2021) Plant growth-promoting bacteria improve growth and nitrogen metabolism in maize and sorghum. Theor Exp Plant Physiol 33:249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-021-00209-x
Bacete L, Hamann T (2020) The role of mechanoperception in plant cell wall integrity maintenance. Plants 9:574. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050574
Bertalan M, Albano R, de Pádua V et al (2009) Complete genome sequence of the sugarcane nitrogen-fixing endophyte Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Pal5. BMC Genom 10:450. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-450
Bidhendi AJ, Chebli Y, Geitmann A (2020) Fluorescence visualization of cellulose and pectin in the primary plant cell wall. J Microsc 278:164–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12895
Bottcher A, Cesarino I, Brombini dos Santos A et al (2013) Lignification in sugarcane: biochemical characterization, gene discovery, and expression analysis in two genotypes contrasting for lignin content. Plant Physiol 163:1539–1557. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.225250
Brusamarello-Santos LCC, Pacheco F, Aljanabi SMM et al (2012) Differential gene expression of rice roots inoculated with the diazotroph Herbaspirillum seropedicae. Plant Soil 356:113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1044-z
Buhl C, Meilan R, Lindroth RL (2017) Genetic modification of lignin in hybrid poplar (Populus alba × Populus tremula) does not substantially alter plant defense or arthropod communities. J Insect Sci 17:76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iex052
Carroll A, Mansoori N, Li S et al (2012) Complexes with mixed primary and secondary cellulose synthases are functional in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol 160:726–737. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.199208
Carvalho TLG, Balsemão-Pires E, Saraiva RM et al (2014) Nitrogen signalling in plant interactions with associative and endophytic diazotrophic bacteria. J Exp Bot 65:5631–5642. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru319
Carvalho TLG, Ballesteros HGF, Thiebaut F et al (2016) Nice to meet you: genetic, epigenetic and metabolic controls of plant perception of beneficial associative and endophytic diazotrophic bacteria in non-leguminous plants. Plant Mol Biol 90:561–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-016-0435-1
Chapelle A, Morreel K, Vanholme R et al (2012) Impact of the absence of stem-specific glucosidases on lignin and monolignols. Plant Physiol 160:1204–1217. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.203364
Chen X-Y, Kim J-Y (2009) Callose synthesis in higher plants. Plant Signal Behav 4:489–492. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.6.8359
Chen X, Marszałkowska M, Reinhold-Hurek B (2020) Jasmonic acid, not salicyclic acid restricts endophytic root colonization of rice. Front Plant Sci 10:1758. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01758
Cho H-T, Cosgrove DJ (2000) Altered expression of expansin modulates leaf growth and pedicel abscission in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9783–9788. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160276997
Clemente PRA, Bezerra BKL, da Silva VSG et al (2017) Root growth and yield of sugarcane as a function of increasing gypsum doses. Pesqui Agropecu Trop 47:110–117. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632016v4742563
Coelho CHM, Medeiros AFA, Polidoro JC et al (2003) Identificação de genótipos de cana-de-açúcar quanto ao potencial de contribuição da fixação biológica de nitrogênio. Agronomia 37:37–40
Correr FH, Hosaka GK, Gómez SGP et al (2020) Time-series expression profiling of sugarcane leaves infected with Puccinia kuehnii reveals an ineffective defense system leading to susceptibility. Plant Cell Rep 39:873–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02536-w
Costa CTS, Ferreira VMF, Endres L et al (2011) (2011) Crescimento e produtividade de quatro variedades de cana-de-açucar. Rev Caatinga 24(3):56–63
De Carvalho TLG, Ferreira PCG, Hemerly AS et al (2011) Sugarcane genetic controls involved in the association with beneficial endophytic nitrogen fixing bacteria. Trop Plant Biol 4:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-011-9069-2
De Lorenzo G, Ferrari S, Giovannoni M et al (2019) Cell wall traits that influence plant development, immunity, and bioconversion. Plant J 97:134–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14196
De Lucas RC, de Oliveira TB, Lima MS et al (2020) Effect of enzymatic pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse with recombinant hemicellulases and esterase prior to the application of the cellobiohydrolase CBH I Megazyme®. Biomass Convers Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00719-9
De Nogueira EM, Vinagre F, Masuda HP et al (2001) Expression of sugarcane genes induced by inoculation with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and Herbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans. Genet Mol Biol 24:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572001000100027
De Souza AP, Leite DCC, Pattathil S et al (2013) Composition and structure of sugarcane cell wall polysaccharides: Implications for second generation bioethanol production. Bioenergy Res 6:564–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9268-1
Deng Y, Chen H, Li C et al (2019) Endophyte Bacillus subtilis evade plant defense by producing lantibiotic subtilomycin to mask self-produced flagellin. Commun Biol 2:368. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0614-0
Dhawi F, Hess A (2017) Plant growth-prompting bacteria influenced metabolites of Zea mays var. amylacea and Pennisetum americanum p. in a species-specific manner. Adv Biol Chem 7:161–169. https://doi.org/10.4236/abc.2017.75011
Donaldson LA, Kroese HW, Hill SJ, Franich RA (2015) Detection of wood cell wall porosity using small carbohydrate molecules and confocal fluorescence microscopy. J Microsc 259:228–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12257
Dong X, Hong Z, Chatterjee J et al (2008) Expression of callose synthase genes and its connection with Npr1 signaling pathway during pathogen infection. Planta 229:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-008-0812-3
dos Santos ML, Berlitz DL, Wiest SLF et al (2018) Benefits associated with the interaction of endophytic bacteria and plants. Braz Arch Biol Technol 61:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2018160431
Dos Santos RM, Diaz PAE, Lobo LLB, Rigobelo EC (2020) Use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in maize and sugarcane: characteristics and applications. Front Sustain Food Syst 4:136. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00136
Engelsdorf T, Gigli-Bisceglia N, Veerabagu M et al (2018) The plant cell wall integrity maintenance and immune signaling systems cooperate to control stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci Signal 11:eaao3070. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aao3070
Fagard M, Desnos T, Desprez T et al (2000) PROCUSTE1 encodes a cellulose synthase required for normal cell elongation specifically in roots and dark-grown hypocotyls of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12:2409–2423. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.12.2409
Ferreira SS, Hotta CT, de Poelking VGC et al (2016) Co-expression network analysis reveals transcription factors associated to cell wall biosynthesis in sugarcane. Plant Mol Biol 91:15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-016-0434-2
Festucci-Buselli RA, Otoni WC, Joshi CP (2007) Structure, organization, and functions of cellulose synthase complexes in higher plants. Braz J Plant Physiol 19:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-04202007000100001
Gallego-Giraldo L, Posé S, Pattathil S et al (2018) Elicitors and defense gene induction in plants with altered lignin compositions. New Phytol 219:1235–1251. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15258
Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circular, vol 347, 2nd edn. California Agricultural Experiment Station, p 32
Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD (2008) Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol 16:463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.008
Hardoim PR, de Carvalho TLG, Ballesteros HGF et al (2019) Genome-wide transcriptome profiling provides insights into the responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to diazotrophic bacteria. Plant Soil 451:121–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04193-9
Höfte H, Voxeur A (2017) Plant cell walls. Curr Biol 27:R865–R870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.025
Irizarry I, White JF (2017) Application of bacteria from non-cultivated plants to promote growth, alter root architecture and alleviate salt stress of cotton. J Appl Microbiol 122:1110–1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13414
Jardim-Messeder D, da Franca ST, Fonseca JP et al (2020) Identification of genes from the general phenylpropanoid and monolignol-specific metabolism in two sugarcane lignin-contrasting genotypes. Mol Genet Genom 295:717–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-020-01653-1
Kifle MH, Laing MD (2016a) Isolation and screening of bacteria for their diazotrophic potential and their influence on growth promotion of maize seedlings in greenhouses. Front Plant Sci 6:1225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01225
Kifle MH, Laing MD (2016b) Effects of selected diazotrophs on maize growth. Front Plant Sci 7:1429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01429
Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
Li X, Chapple C (2010) Understanding lignification: challenges beyond monolignol biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 154:449–452. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.162842
Li Y, Shao J, Xie Y et al (2021) Volatile compounds from beneficial rhizobacteria Bacillus spp. promote periodic lateral root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ 44:1663–1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14021
Lima DU, Santos HP, Tiné M, a, et al (2001) Patterns of expression of cell wall related genes in sugarcane. Genet Mol Biol 24:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572001000100026
Luna E, Pastor V, Robert J et al (2011) Callose deposition : a multifaceted plant defense response. MPMI 24:183–193. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-07-10-0149
Ma QH, Zhu HH, Han JQ (2017) Wheat ROP proteins modulate defense response through lignin metabolism. Plant Sci 262:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.04.017
Maleki SS, Mohammadi K, Movahedi A et al (2020) Increase in cell wall thickening and biomass production by overexpression of PmCesA2 in poplar. Front Plant Sci 11:110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00110
Mendonça ES, De Lima PC, Guimarães GP et al (2017) Biological nitrogen fixation by legumes and N uptake by coffee plants. Rev Bras Cienc Do Solo 41:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20160178
Mendu V, Griffiths JS, Persson S et al (2011) Subfunctionalization of cellulose synthases in seed coat epidermal cells mediates secondary radial wall synthesis and mucilage attachment. Plant Physiol 157:441–453. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.179069
Mengistu AA (2020) Endophytes: Colonization, behaviour, and their role in defense mechanism. Int J Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6927219 (Article ID 6927219)
Novaković L, Guo T, Bacic A et al (2018) Hitting the wall—sensing and signaling pathways involved in plant cell wall remodeling in response to abiotic stress. Plants 7:89. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040089
Numan M, Bashir S, Khan Y et al (2018) Plant growth promoting bacteria as an alternative strategy for salt tolerance in plants: a review. Microbiol Res 209:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.02.003
Pandya M, Rajput M, Rajkumar S (2015) Exploring plant growth promoting potential of non rhizobial root nodules endophytes of Vigna radiata. Microbiology 84:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261715010105
Pankievicz VCS, do Amaral FP, Ané J-M, Stacey G (2021) Diazotrophic bacteria and their mechanisms to interact and benefit cereals. MPMI. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-11-20-0316-fi
Pedraza RO (2008) Recent advances in nitrogen-fixing acetic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 125:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.079
Pham VTK, Rediers H, Ghequire MGK et al (2017) The plant growth-promoting effect of the nitrogen-fixing endophyte Pseudomonas stutzeri A15. Arch Microbiol 199:513–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1332-3
Puente ML, Zawoznik M, de Sabando ML et al (2019) Improvement of soybean grain nutritional quality under foliar inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense strain Az39. Symbiosis 77:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-018-0568-x
Ramakrishna W, Yadav R, Li K (2019) Plant growth promoting bacteria in agriculture: two sides of a coin. Appl Soil Ecol 138:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.02.019
Rao X, Huang X, Zhou Z, Lin X (2013) An improvement of the 2ˆ(-delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. Biostat Bioinforma Biomath 3:71–85
Reis Junior F, Reis VM, Da Silva L, Dobereiner J (2000) Levantamento e quantificaçao de bactérias diazotróficas em diferentes genotipos de cana-de-açúcar (Saccharum spp.). Pesqui Agropecu Bras 35:985–994
Ribeiro VP, Marriel IE, de Sousa SM et al (2018) Endophytic Bacillus strains enhance pearl millet growth and nutrient uptake under low-P. Braz J Microbiol 49:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2018.06.005
Rich MK, Schorderet M, Reinhardt D (2014) The role of the cell wall compartment in mutualistic symbioses of plants. Front Plant Sci 5:238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00238
Rui Y, Dinneny JR (2020) A wall with integrity: surveillance and maintenance of the plant cell wall under stress. New Phytol 225:1428–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16166
Ruzin S (1999) Plant microtechnique and microscopy. Ann Bot 86:708. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1231
Santa Brigida AB, Rojas CA, Grativol C et al (2016) Sugarcane transcriptome analysis in response to infection caused by Acidovorax avenae subsp avenae. PLoS ONE 11:e0166473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166473
Santoyo G, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, del Carmen O-M, Glick BR (2016) Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol Res 183:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008
Schmatz AA, Tyhoda L, Brienzo M (2020) Sugarcane biomass conversion influenced by lignin. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 14:469–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2070
Schuetz M, Benske A, Smith RA et al (2014) Laccases direct lignification in the discrete secondary cell wall domains of protoxylem. Plant Physiol 166:798–807. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.245597
Simmons BA, Loqué D, Ralph J (2010) Advances in modifying lignin for enhanced biofuel production. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2010.03.001
Simonetti E, Roberts IN, Montecchia MS et al (2018) A novel Burkholderia ambifaria strain able to degrade the mycotoxin fusaric acid and to inhibit Fusarium spp. growth. Microbiol Res 206:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.09.008
Stork J, Harris D, Griffiths J et al (2010) CELLULOSE SYNTHASE9 serves a nonredundant role in secondary cell wall synthesis in Arabidopsis epidermal testa cells. Plant Physiol 153:580–589. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.154062
Tang D, Wang G, Zhou J-M (2017) Receptor kinases in plant-pathogen interactions: more than pattern recognition. Plant Cell 29:618–637. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00891
Taylor PWJ, Dukic S (1993) Development of an in vitro culture technique for conservation of Saccharum spp. hybrid germplasm. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 34:217–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036105
Thévenin J, Pollet B, Letarnec B et al (2011) The simultaneous repression of CCR and CAD, two enzymes of the lignin biosynthetic pathway, results in sterility and dwarfism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant 4:70–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq045
Thiebaut F, Rojas CA, Grativol C et al (2017) Roles of non-coding RNA in sugarcane-microbe interaction. Non-Coding RNA 3(4):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna3040025
Underwood W (2012) The plant cell wall: a dynamic barrier against pathogen invasion. Front Plant Sci 3:85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00085
Urquiaga S, Lima RDMEM, Xavier RP et al (2003) Avaliação da eficiência do processo de fixação biológica de nitrogênio em diferentes variedades de cana-de-açúcar. Agronomia 37:55–58
Urquiaga S, Xavier RP, de Morais RF et al (2012) Evidence from field nitrogen balance and 15N natural abundance data for the contribution of biological N 2 fixation to Brazilian sugarcane varieties. Plant Soil 356:5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1016-3
Vacheron J, Desbrosses G, Bouffaud M-L et al (2013) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front Plant Sci 4:356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00356
Vanholme R, Storme V, Vanholme B et al (2012) A systems biology view of responses to lignin biosynthesis perturbations in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24:3506–3529. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.102574
Vargas C, Muniz de Paula VL, Noguera E et al (2003) Signaling pathways mediating the association between sugarcane and endophytic diazotrophic bacteria: A genomic approach. Symbiosis 35:159–180
Vargas L, de Carvalho TLG, Ferreira PCG et al (2012) Early responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings to inoculation with beneficial diazotrophic bacteria are dependent on plant and bacterial genotypes. Plant Soil 356:127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1274-8
Vargas L, Brígida ABS, Mota Filho JP et al (2014) Drought tolerance conferred to sugarcane by association with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus: a transcriptomic view of hormone pathways. PLoS ONE 9(12):e114744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114744
Vinagre F, Vargas C, Schwarcz K et al (2006) SHR5: A novel plant receptor kinase involved in plant-N2-fixing endophytic bacteria association. J Exp Bot 57:559–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj041
Vogt T (2010) Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Mol Plant 3:2–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssp106
Voigt CA (2014) Callose-mediated resistance to pathogenic intruders in plant defense-related papillae. Front Plant Sci 5:168. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00168
Wachsman G, Sparks EE, Benfey PN (2015) Genes and networks regulating root anatomy and architecture. New Phytol 208:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13469
Wang D, Yuan S, Yin L et al (2012) A missense mutation in the transmembrane domain of CESA9 affects cell wall biosynthesis and plant growth in rice. Plant Sci 196:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.08.002
Ward N, Moreno-Hagelsieb G (2014) Quickly finding orthologs as reciprocal best hits with BLAT, LAST, and UBLAST: How much do we miss? PLoS ONE 9(7):e101850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101850
Zhang D, Zhang B (2020) Pectin drives cell wall morphogenesis without turgor pressure. Trends Plant Sci 25:719–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.05.007
Acknowledgements
Brazilian Institute for Science and Technology on Biological Nitrogen Fixation (INCT-FBN), Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Funding Authority for Studies and Projects (FINEP), and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) funded this work. INCT/CNPq, FAPERJ, and CAPES supported HGFB and TLGC for postgraduate fellowships. ACR is supported by CNPq for Ph.D. fellowships. ASH receives support from CNPq and FINEP research grants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data availability statement
The raw RNA-seq data are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) under the BioProject accession number PRJNA226750 and BioSamples accession numbers SRX375173–SRX375188.
Additional information
Communicated by Dorothea Bartels.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
425_2021_3768_MOESM1_ESM.tif
Supplementary file1 (TIF 11022 kb) Fig. S1 Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed transcripts from gene families involved in cell wall functions in sugarcane stalks. Expression pattern of a Glycosyltransferase (GT) family, b Laccases, c Nucleotide-sugar, d Peroxidases, e Glycoside-hydrolase-family-17, and f Proteases represented in naturally colonized roots (NC-root) and naturally colonized shoots (NC-shoot) from 15-day-old germinated stalks. Colors represent differential gene regulation as log2 fold change, calculated as SP root/CH root and SP shoot/CH shoot. Blue represents higher expressions in Chunee (CH) genotype and red represents higher expressions in SP70-1143 (SP) genotype. The two columns for each comparison represent the two biological replicates. For specific analysis of each gene after hierarchical clustering, see Table S3
425_2021_3768_MOESM2_ESM.tif
Supplementary file2 (TIF 5792 kb) Fig. S2 Root morphology of naturally colonized plants germinated from stalks, in two contrasting genotypes. a–c SP70-1143 roots, d–f Chunee roots. a–f Representative sections of three analyzed regions of the roots: a, d upper zone; b, e middle zone; c, f basal zone. Roots of SP70-1143 and Chunee were stained with Safranin O, 0.5 mg/mL. g Measurement of length of naturally colonized plant roots. The graph represents the average length of 30 roots ± SD. h Schematic representation of tissue areas of representative root sections of SP70-1143 and Chunee contrasting genotypes. The asterisk over the bar indicates that the differences between the means are statistically significant with p value ≤ 0.05
425_2021_3768_MOESM3_ESM.tif
Supplementary file3 (TIF 4684 kb) Fig. S3 Cellulose, callose, and lignin staining in shoots of SP70-1143 and Chunee genotypes. Cellulose and callose in leaf cell walls were stained with Calcofluor white and Aniline blue, respectively, and visualized through confocal microscopy. Relative fluorescence was quantified (see Materials and methods for details). Lignified structures in leaf cell walls were stained with phloroglucinol and visualized through light microscopy. a, b Confocal micrographs of cellulose staining. c, d Confocal micrographs of callose staining. e, f Light microscopy images of lignin staining. g Comparative analyses of cellulose relative fluorescence quantified in vascular tissues of stalk shoots of SP70-1143 and Chunee genotypes. h Comparative analyses of relative callose fluorescence quantified in vascular tissues of stalk shoots of SP70-1143 and Chunee genotypes. Bars indicate mean ± standard deviation (n= 30). t test (p value ≤ 0.05) was performed. Asterisks (*) indicate significant changes between SP70-1143 and Chunee samples. Bar = 150 µm; arrow, epidermis; arrowhead: vascular tissue; e, sclerenchyma
425_2021_3768_MOESM4_ESM.tif
Supplementary file4 (TIF 8294 kb) Fig. S4 Comparison of expression profiles of cell wall genes between roots naturally colonized and roots free of diazotrophic bacteria. The graph shows the expression profiles from RNA-seq of naturally colonized stalk roots (STALK) and plantlet roots cultivated for 15 days in hydroponic condition, from SP70-1143 and Chunee genotypes. Values were presented as SP70-1143 compared with Chunee and transformed in log2 fold change. Bars represented mean ± SD of two biological replicates of Stalk and Hydroponic transcriptomes
425_2021_3768_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary file8 (XLSX 111 kb) Table S1 Annotated DETs between SP70-1143 (SP) and Chunee (CH) germinated stalk tissues belonging to the cell wall functional category
425_2021_3768_MOESM6_ESM.xls
Supplementary file6 (XLS 11 kb) Table S2 Primers used for validation of compounds synthesis of assembly architecture and growth genes in stalk and inoculated plants
425_2021_3768_MOESM7_ESM.xls
Supplementary file7 (XLS 499 kb) Table S3 Cell wall pathway annotation. Gene families involved in cell wall biosynthesis pathway were identified in the reference transcriptome RT1 through local alignment annotation using protein sequence database of two monocotyledons (rice and maize) and one eudicotyledon (A. thaliana). The homologs in S. spontaneum, S. hybrid, and S. bicolor are also presented. The transcriptome database was aligned at a minimum of 70% identity and e value ≤ 10-5
425_2021_3768_MOESM8_ESM.tif
Supplementary file5 (TIF 143 kb) Fig. S8 Colonization by G. diazotrophicus of SP70-1143 (SP) and Chunee (CH) plantlets, after diazotrophic bacterial inoculation. Relative levels of G. diazotrophicus colonizing a roots and b shoots of inoculated and control mock plants were evaluated by RT-qPCR, 15 days after bacterial inoculation. Bacterial 23S rRNA levels were normalized with rice 28S rRNA and sugarcane GAPDH levels. Values of all three biological replicates are presented in the graph. Bars indicate mean ± SD
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ballesteros, H.G.F., Rosman, A.C., Carvalho, T.L.G. et al. Cell wall formation pathways are differentially regulated in sugarcane contrasting genotypes associated with endophytic diazotrophic bacteria. Planta 254, 109 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-021-03768-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-021-03768-0


