, Volume 250, Issue 1, pp 115–127 | Cite as

Variability in temperature-independent transpiration responses to evaporative demand correlate with nighttime water use and its circadian control across diverse wheat populations

  • Bishal G. Tamang
  • Rémy Schoppach
  • Daniel Monnens
  • Brian J. Steffenson
  • James A. Anderson
  • Walid SadokEmail author
Original Article


Main conclusion

Nocturnal transpiration, through its circadian control, plays a role in modulating daytime transpiration response to increasing evaporative demand, to potentially enable drought tolerance in wheat.

Limiting plant transpiration rate (TR) in response to increasing vapor pressure deficit (VPD) has been suggested to enable drought tolerance through water conservation. However, there is very little information on the extent of diversity of TR response curves to “true” VPD (i.e., independent from temperature). Furthermore, new evidence indicate that water-saving could operate by modulating nocturnal TR (TRN), and that this response might be coupled to daytime gas exchange. Based on 3 years of experimental data on a diverse group of 77 genotypes from 25 countries and 5 continents, a first goal of this study was to characterize the functional diversity in daytime TR responses to VPD and TRN in wheat. A second objective was to test the hypothesis that these traits could be coupled through the circadian clock. Using a new gravimetric phenotyping platform that allowed for independent temperature and VPD control, we identified three and fourfold variation in daytime and nighttime responses, respectively. In addition, TRN was found to be positively correlated with slopes of daytime TR responses to VPD, and we identified pre-dawn variation in TRN that likely mediated this relationship. Furthermore, pre-dawn increase in TRN positively correlated with the year of release among drought-tolerant Australian cultivars and with the VPD threshold at which they initiated water-saving. Overall, the study indicates a substantial diversity in TR responses to VPD that could be leveraged to enhance fitness under water-limited environments, and that TRN and its circadian control may play an important role in the expression of water-saving.


Canopy conductance Circadian clock Drought tolerance Gravimetric phenotyping Nocturnal transpiration Stomata conductance Vapor pressure deficit Wheat 



Transpiration rate


Nighttime transpiration rate


Vapor pressure deficit


VPD threshold


Gravimetric phenotyping



This work was supported by the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station (Project# MIN-13-095), the Minnesota Wheat Research & Promotion Council (Projects# 00062299 and 00070003), the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS, contract# 1.E038.13), and by the National Science Foundation/Civilian Research & Development Foundation (Award# OISE-16-62788-0).

Supplementary material

425_2019_3151_MOESM1_ESM.docx (35 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 35 kb)


  1. Belko N, Zaman-Allah M, Diop NN, Cisse N, Zombre G, Ehlers JD, Vadez V (2013) Restriction of transpiration rate under high vapour pressure deficit and non-limiting water conditions is important for terminal drought tolerance in cowpea. Plant Biol 15:304–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bramley H, Turner NC, Turner DW, Tyerman SD (2009) Roles of morphology, anatomy, and aquaporins in determining contrasting hydraulic behavior of roots. Plant Physiol 150:348–364CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Christman MA, Richards JH, McKay JK, Stahl EA, Juenger TE, Donovan LA (2008) Genetic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana for night-time leaf conductance. Plant Cell Environ 31:1170–1178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Claverie E, Meunier F, Javaux M, Sadok W (2018) Increased contribution of wheat nocturnal transpiration to daily water use under drought. Physiol Plant 162:290–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Coupel-Ledru A, Lebon E, Christophe A, Gallo A, Gago P, Pantin F, Doligez A, Simonneau T (2016) Reduced nighttime transpiration is a relevant breeding target for high water-use efficiency in grapevine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:8963–8968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Drake PL, Froend RH, Franks PJ (2013) Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. J Exp Bot 64:495–505CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Fletcher AL, Sinclair TR, Allen LH (2007) Transpiration responses to vapour pressure deficit in well watered ‘slow-wilting’ and commercial soybean. Environ Exp Bot 61:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kholová J, Zindy P, Malayee S, Baddam R, Murugesan T, Kaliamoorthy S, Hash CT, Votrubová O, Soukup A, Kocová M, Niang M, Vadez V (2016) Component traits of plant water use are modulated by vapour pressure deficit in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.). Funct Plant Biol 43:423–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kirkegaard JA, Hunt JR (2010) Increasing productivity by matching farming system management and genotype in water-limited environments. J Exp Bot 61:4129–4143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kudoyarova G, Veselova S, Hartung W, Farhutdinov R, Veselov D, Sharipova G (2011) Involvement of root ABA and hydraulic conductance in the control of water relations in wheat plants exposed to increased evaporative demand. Planta 233:87–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kupper P, Rohula G, Saksing L, Sellin A, Lõhmus K, Ostonen I, Helmisaari H-S, Sõber A (2012) Does soil nutrient availability influence night-time water flux of aspen saplings? Environ Exp Bot 82:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuwagata T, Ishikawa-Sakurai J, Hayashi H, Nagasuga K, Fukushi K, Ahamed A, Takasugi K, Katsuhara M, Murai-Hatano M (2012) Influence of low air humidity and low root temperature on water uptake, growth and aquaporin expression in rice plants. Plant Cell Physiol 53:1418–1431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee SH, Chung GC, Jang JY, Ahn SJ, Zwiazek JJ (2012) Overexpression of PIP2;5 aquaporin alleviates effects of low root temperature on cell hydraulic conductivity and growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 159:479–488CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Messina CD, Sinclair TR, Hammer GL, Curan D, Thompson J, Oler Z, Gho C, Cooper M (2015) Limited-transpiration trait may increase maize drought tolerance in the US corn belt. Agron J 107:1978–1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Motulsky HJ, Brown RE (2006) Detecting outliers when fitting data with nonlinear regression—a new method based on robust nonlinear regression and the false discovery rate. BMC Bioinformatics 7:123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Passioura J (2012) Phenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops: when is it useful to breeders? Funct Plant Biol 39:851–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil, and grass. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 193:120–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  19. Rawson HM, Clarke JM (1989) Nocturnal transpiration in wheat. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:397–406Google Scholar
  20. Resco de Dios V, Gessler A (2018) Circadian regulation of photosynthesis and transpiration from genes to ecosystems. Environ Exp Bot 152:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Resco de Dios V, Roy J, Ferrio JP, Alday JG, Landais D, Milcu A, Gessler A (2015) Processes driving nocturnal transpiration and implications for estimating land evapotranspiration. Sci Rep 5:10975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Resco de Dios V, Loik ME, Smith R, Aspinwall MJ, Tissue DT (2016) Genetic variation in circadian regulation of nocturnal stomatal conductance enhances carbon assimilation and growth. Plant Cell Environ 39:3–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Richards RA, Passioura JB (1989) A breeding program to reduce the diameter of the major xylem vessel in the seminal roots of wheat and its effect on grain yield in rain-fed environments. Aust J Agr Res 40:943–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosas-Anderson P, Taggart MJ, Heitman JL, Miller GL, Sinclair TR, Rufty TW (2018) Partitioning between evaporation and transpiration from Agrostis stolonifera L. during light and dark periods. Agr Forest Meteorol 260–261:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ryan AC, Dodd IC, Rothwell SA, Jones R, Tardieu F, Draye X, Davies WJ (2016) Gravimetric phenotyping of whole plant transpiration responses to atmospheric vapour pressure deficit identifies genotypic variation in water use efficiency. Plant Sci 251:101–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sadok W (2016) The circadian life of nocturnal water use: when late-night decisions help improve your day. Plant Cell Environ 39:1–2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sadok W, Schoppach R (2019) Potential involvement of root auxins in drought tolerance by modulating nocturnal and daytime water use in wheat. Ann. Bot. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2010) Transpiration response of ‘slow-wilting’ and commercial soybean (Glycine max (L) Merr.) genotypes to three aquaporin inhibitors under high evaporative demand. J Exp Bot 61:821–829CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schoppach R, Sadok W (2012) Differential sensitivities of transpiration to evaporative demand and soil water deficit among wheat elite cultivars indicate different strategies for drought tolerance. Environ Exp Bot 84:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schoppach R, Claverie E, Sadok W (2014a) Genotype-dependent influence of night-time vapour pressure deficit on night-time transpiration and daytime gas exchange in wheat. Funct Plant Biol 41:963–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schoppach R, Wauthelet D, Jeanguenin L, Sadok W (2014b) Conservative water use under high evaporative demand associated with smaller root metaxylem and limited trans-membrane water transport in wheat. Funct Plant Biol 41:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schoppach R, Taylor JD, Majerus E, Claverie E, Baumann U, Suchecki R, Fleury D, Sadok W (2016) High resolution mapping of traits related to whole-plant transpiration under increasing evaporative demand in wheat. J Exp Bot 67:2847–2860CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoppach R, Fleury D, Sinclair TR, Sadok W (2017) Transpiration sensitivity to evaporative demand across 120 years of breeding of Australian wheat cultivars. J Agron Crop Sci 203:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shekoofa A, Sinclair TR, Messina CD, Cooper M (2016) Variation among maize hybrids in response to high vapor pressure deficit at high temperatures. Crop Sci 56:392–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sinclair TR, Muchow RC (2001) System analysis of plant traits to increase grain yield on limited water supplies. Agron J 93:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sinclair TR, Hammer GL, van Oosterom EJ (2005) Potential yield and water- use efficiency benefits in sorghum from limited maximum transpiration rate. Funct Plant Biol 32:945–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sinclair TR, Messina CD, Beatty A, Samples M (2010) Assessment across the United States of the benefits of altered soybean drought traits. Agron J 102:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sinclair TR, Wherle BG, Dukes MD, Cathey SE (2014) Penman’s sink-strength model as an improved approach to estimating plant canopy transpiration. Agr Forest Meteorol 197:136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sinclair TR, Devi J, Shekoofa A, Choudhary S, Sadok W, Vadez V, Riar M, Rufty T (2017) Limited-transpiration response to high vapor pressure deficit in crop species. Plant Sci 260:109–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tamang BG, Sadok W (2018) Nightly business: links between daytime canopy conductance, nocturnal transpiration and its circadian control illuminate physiological trade-offs in maize. Environ Exp Bot 148:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tanner CB, Sinclair TR (1983) Efficient water use in crop production: research or re- search? In: Taylor HM, Wayne JR, Thomas SR (eds) Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  42. Vadez V, Kholová J, Medina S, Kakkera A, Anderberg H (2014) Transpiration efficiency: new insights into an old story. J Exp Bot 65:6141–6153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Yang Z, Sinclair TR, Zhu M, Messina C, Cooper M, Hammer GL (2012) Temperature effect on transpiration response of maize plants to vapour pressure deficit. Environ Exp Bot 78:157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and Plant GeneticsUniversity of Minnesota Twin CitiesTwin CitiesUSA
  2. 2.Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of MinnesotaTwin CitiesUSA

Personalised recommendations