Advertisement

Planta

, Volume 247, Issue 5, pp 1099–1108 | Cite as

Development of Thinopyrum ponticum-specific molecular markers and FISH probes based on SLAF-seq technology

  • Liqin Liu
  • Qiaoling Luo
  • Wan Teng
  • Bin Li
  • Hongwei Li
  • Yiwen Li
  • Zhensheng Li
  • Qi Zheng
Original Article

Abstract

Main conclusion

Based on SLAF-seq, 67 Thinopyrum ponticum-specific markers and eight Th. ponticum-specific FISH probes were developed, and these markers and probes could be used for detection of alien chromatin in a wheat background.

Abstract

Decaploid Thinopyrum ponticum (2n = 10x = 70) is a valuable gene reservoir for wheat improvement. Identification of Th. ponticum introgression would facilitate its transfer into diverse wheat genetic backgrounds and its practical utilization in wheat improvement. Based on specific-locus-amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) technology, 67 new Th. ponticum-specific molecular markers and eight Th. ponticum-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes have been developed from a tiny wheat—Th. ponticum translocation line. These newly developed molecular markers allowed the detection of Th. ponticum DNA in a variety of materials specifically and steadily at high throughput. According to the hybridization signal pattern, the eight Th. ponticum-specific probes could be divided into two groups. The first group including five dispersed repetitive sequence probes could identify Th. ponticum chromatin more sensitively and accurately than genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Whereas the second group having three tandem repetitive sequence probes enabled the discrimination of Th. ponticum chromosomes together with another clone pAs1 in wheat–Th. ponticum partial amphiploid Xiaoyan 68.

Keywords

FISH GISH Molecular markers SLAF-seq Thinopyrum ponticum  Triticum aestivum 

Abbreviations

GISH

Genome in situ hybridization

FISH

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

CS

Wheat cv. Chinese spring

SLAF-seq

Specific-locus-amplified fragment sequencing

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Yonghong Zhou from Sichuan Agricultural University, Prof. Diaoguo An from Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Dr. Jinpeng Zhang from Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, for kindly providing seeds of some of the accessions used in this study. This project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0102000) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA08030105).

Supplementary material

425_2018_2845_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)
425_2018_2845_MOESM2_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 25 kb)
425_2018_2845_MOESM3_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 16 kb)
425_2018_2845_MOESM4_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Bai JR, Jia X, Wang DW (2002) Advances in studies of genome-specific repetitive DNA sequences in wheat and related species. Hereditas 24(5):595–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bournival B, Obanni M, Abad A, Ohm H, Mackenzie S (1994) Isolation of a new species-specific repetitive sequence from Thinopyrum elongatum and its use in the studies of alien translocations. Genome 37(1):97–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Q, Conner RL, Laroche A, Thomas JB (1998) Genome analysis of Thinopyrum intermedium and Thinopyrum ponticum using genomic in situ hybridization. Genome 41(4):580–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen SQ, Huang ZF, Dai Y, Qin SW, Gao YY, Zhang LL, Gao Y, Chen JM (2013a) The development of 7E chromosome-specific molecular markers for Thinopyrum elongatum based on SLAF-seq technology. PLoS One 8(6):e65122.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065122 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen SQ, Qin SW, Huang ZF, Dai Y, Zhang LL, Gao YY, Gao Y, Chen JM (2013b) Development of specific molecular markers for Thinopyrum elongatum chromosome using SLAF-seq technique. Acta Agron Sin 39(4):727.  https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1006.2013.00727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML (2011) Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 12(7):499–510.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewey DR (1984) The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennial Triticeae. Stadler Genet Symp 16:209–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gill KS, Lubbers EL, Gill BS, Raupp WJ, Cox TS (1991) A genetic linkage map of Triticum tauschii (DD) and its relationship to the D genome of bread wheat (AABBDD). Genome 34(3):362–374.  https://doi.org/10.1139/g91-058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez-Garcia M, Cuacos M, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Puertas MJ, Vega JM (2011) Painting the rye genome with genome-specific sequences. Genome 54(7):555–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Han FP, Fedak G, Benabdelmouna A, Armstrong K, Ouellet T (2003) Characterization of six wheat x Thinopyrum intermedium derivatives by GISH, RFLP, and multicolor GISH. Genome 46(3):490–495.  https://doi.org/10.1139/G03-032 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jauhar PP, Peterson TS, Xu SS (2009) Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of a durum alien disomic addition line with enhanced tolerance to Fusarium head blight. Genome 52(5):467–483.  https://doi.org/10.1139/G09-014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jia QJ, Tan C, Wang JM, Zhang XQ, Zhu JH, Luo H, Yang JM, Westcott S, Broughton S, Moody D, Li CD (2016) Marker development using SLAF-seq and whole-genome shotgun strategy to fine-map the semi-dwarf gene ari-e in barley. BMC Genom 17(1):911.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3247-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kong XY, Zhou RH, Dong YS, Jia JZ (1999) Cloning and characterization of a genome-specific repetitive sequence in Aegilops caudata L. Chin Sci Bull 44:1301–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kruppa K, Turkosi E, Mayer M, Toth V, Vida G, Szakacs E, Molnar-Lang M (2016) McGISH identification and phenotypic description of leaf rust and yellow rust resistant partial amphiploids originating from a wheat × Thinopyrum synthetic hybrid cross. J Appl Genet 57(4):427–437.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-016-0343-8 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Li HJ, Wang XM (2009) Thinopyrum ponticum and Th. intermedium: the promising source of resistance to fungal and viral diseases of wheat. J Genet Genom 36(9):557–565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60147-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li WL, Chen PD, Qi LL, Liu DJ (1995) Isolation, characterization and application of a species-specific repeated sequence from Haynaldia villosa. Theor Appl Genet 90(3–4):526–533PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li HJ, Chen O, Conner RL, Guo BH, Zhang YM, Graf RJ, Laroche A, Jia X, Liu GS, Chu CC (2003) Molecular characterization of a wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum partial amphiploid and its derivatives for resistance to leaf rust. Genome 46(5):906–913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Li XM, Lee BS, Mammadov AC, Koo BC, Mott IW, Wang RRC (2007) CAPS markers specific to Eb, Ee, and R genomes in the tribe Triticeae. Genome 50(4):400–411.  https://doi.org/10.1139/G07-025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Li GR, Wang HJ, Lang T, Li JB, La SX, Yang EN, Yang ZJ (2016) New molecular markers and cytogenetic probes enable chromosome identification of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium introgression lines for improving protein and gluten contents. Planta 244(4):865–876CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin F, Sun Q, Xu SC, Chen XM, Zhang LJ, Zhang CY, Xu YF, Miao Q, Qu B, Li N, Zhai Q (2009) Identification of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium alien disomic addition lines conferring resistance to stripe rust. Can J Plant Sci 89(3):569–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Linc G, Sepsi A, Molnar-Lang M (2012) A FISH karyotype to study chromosome polymorphisms for the Elytrigia elongata E genome. Cytogenet Genome Res 136(2):138–144.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000334835 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu JQ, Kolmer JA (1998) Molecular and virulence diversity and linkage disequilibria in asexual and sexual populations of the wheat leaf rust fungus, Puccinia recondite. Genome 41(6):832–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luo C, Shu B, Yao Q, Wu H, Xu W, Wang S (2016) Construction of a high-density genetic map based on large-scale marker development in mango using specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq). Front Plant Sci 7:1310.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01310 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mcintyre CL, Clarke BC, Appels R (1988) Amplification and dispersion of repeated DNA-sequences in the Triticeae. Plant Syst Evol 160(1–2):39–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00936708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muramatsu M (1990) Cytogenetics of decaploid Agropyron elongatum (Elytrigia elongata) (2n = 70). I. Frequency of decavalent formation. Genome 33(6):811–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Santra DK, Watt C, Little L, Kidwell KK, Campbell KG (2006) Comparison of a modified assay method for the endopeptidase marker Ep-D1b with the sequence tag site marker XustSSR2001-7DL for strawbreaker foot rot resistance in wheat. Plant Breed 125(1):13–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01172.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwarzacher T, Anamthawatjonsson K, Harrison GE, Islam AKMR, Jia JZ, King IP, Leitch AR, Miller TE, Reader SM, Rogers WJ, Shi M, Heslop-Harrison JS (1992) Genomic in situ hybridization to identify alien chromosomes and chromosome segments in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 84(7–8):778–786PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sepsi A, Molnar I, Szalay D, Molnar-Lang M (2008) Characterization of a leaf rust-resistant wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum partial amphiploid BE-1, using sequential multicolor GISH and FISH. Theor Appl Genet 116(6):825–834.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0716-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shannon MC (1978) Testing salt tolerance variability among tall wheatgrass lines. Agron J 70:719–722.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1978.00021962007000050006x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharma HC, Ohm HW, Lister RM, Foster JE, Shukle RH (1989) Response of wheatgrasses and wheat × wheatgrass hybrids to barley yellow dwarf virus. Theor Appl Genet 77(3):369–374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305830 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sibikeev SN, Badaeva ED, Gultyaeva EI, Druzhin AE, Shishkina AA, Dragovich AY, Kroupin PY, Karlov GI, Khuat TM, Divashuk MG (2017) Comparative analysis of Agropyron intermedium (Host) Beauv 6Agi and 6Agi2 chromosomes in bread wheat cultivars and lines with wheat-wheatgrass substitutions. Russ J Genet 53(3):314–324.  https://doi.org/10.1134/s1022795417030115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun X, Liu D, Zhang X, Li W, Liu H, Hong W, Jiang C, Guan N, Ma C, Zeng H, Xu C, Song J, Huang L, Wang C, Shi J, Wang R, Zheng X, Lu C, Wang X, Zheng H (2013) SLAF-seq: an efficient method of large-scale de novo SNP discovery and genotyping using high-throughput sequencing. PLoS One 8(3):e58700.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058700 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang RRC, Marburger JE, Hu CJ (1991) Tissue-culture-facilitated production of aneuploid haploid Thinopyrum ponticum and amphiploid Hordeum violaceum × H. bogdenii and their use in phylogenetic studies. Theor Appl Genet 81:151–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang RRC, Larson SR, Jensen KB (2010) Analyses of Thinopyrum bessarabicum, T. elongatum, and T. junceum chromosomes using EST-SSR markers. Genome 53(12):1083–1089.  https://doi.org/10.1139/G10-088 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang Y, Yu KF, Xie Q, Kang HY, Lin LJ, Fan X, Sha LN, Zhang HQ, Zhou YH (2011) Cytogenetic, genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and agronomic characterization of alien addition lines derived from wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica. Afr J Biotechnol 10(12):2201–2211Google Scholar
  36. Wang RRC, Larson SR, Jensen KB, Bushman BS, DeHaan LR, Wang S, Yan X (2015) Genome evolution of intermediate wheatgrass as revealed by EST-SSR markers developed from its three progenitor diploid species. Genome 58(2):63–70.  https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2014-0186 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang ZJ, Li GR, Chang ZJ, Zhou JP, Ren ZL (2006) Characterization of a partial amphiploid between Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring and Thinopyrum intermedium ssp trichophorum. Euphytica 149(1–2):11–17Google Scholar
  38. Yao H, Tang CG, Zhao J, Zheng Q, Li B, Hao CY, Li ZS, Zhang XY (2016) Isolation of Thinopyrum ponticum genome specific repetitive sequences and their application for effective detection of alien segments in wheat. Sci Agri Sin 49(19):3683–3693.  https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.19.002 Google Scholar
  39. Yu BL, Huang ZF, Zhou WJ, Zhang WJ (2001) The creation of 1H chromosome-specific CAPs and ASA markers of barley. Acta Genet Sin 28(6):550–555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang XY, Dong YS, Wang RRC (1996a) Characterization of genomes and chromosomes in partial amphiploids of the hybrid Triticum aestivum x Thinopyrum ponticum by in situ hybridization, isozyme analysis, and RAPD. Genome 39(6):1062–1071.  https://doi.org/10.1139/g96-133 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang XY, Koul A, Petroski R, Ouellet T, Fedak G, Dong YS, Wang RRC (1996b) Molecular verification and characterization of BYDV-resistant germ plasms derived from hybrids of wheat with Thinopyrum ponticum and Th. intermedium. Theor Appl Genet 93(7):1033–1039CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zheng Q, Li B, Mu SM, Zhou HP, Li ZS (2006a) Physical mapping of the blue-grained gene(s) from Thinopyrum ponticum by GISH and FISH in a set of translocation lines with different seed colors in wheat. Genome 49(9):1109–1114.  https://doi.org/10.1139/G06-073 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zheng Q, Li B, Zhang X, Mu S, Zhou H, Li Z (2006b) Molecular cytogenetic characterization of wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum translocations bearing blue-grained gene(s) induced by r-ray. Euphytica 152(1):51–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9176-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zheng Q, Lv Z, Niu Z, Li B, Li H, Xu SS, Han F, Li Z (2014) Molecular cytogenetic characterization and stem rust resistance of five wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum partial amphiploids. J Genet Genom 41(11):591–599.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2014.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zheng Q, Luo Q, Niu Z, Li H, Li B, Xu SS, Li Z (2015) Variation in chromosome constitution of the Xiaoyan series partial amphiploids and its relationship to stripe rust and stem rust resistance. J Genet Genom 42(11):657–660.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2015.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Genetics and Developmental BiologyChinese Academy of Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome EngineeringBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations