Isolation and characterization of the Jatropha curcas APETALA1 (JcAP1) promoter conferring preferential expression in inflorescence buds


Main conclusion

The 1.5 kb JcAP1 promoter from the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas is predominantly active in the inflorescence buds of transgenic plants, in which the −1313/−1057 region is essential for maintaining the activity.

Arabidopsis thaliana APETALA1 (AP1) is a MADS-domain transcription factor gene that functions primarily in flower development. We isolated a homolog of AP1 from Jatropha curcas (designated JcAP1), which was shown to exhibit flower-specific expression in Jatropha. JcAP1 is first expressed in inflorescence buds and continues to be primarily expressed in the sepals. We isolated a 1.5 kb JcAP1 promoter and evaluated its activity in transgenic Arabidopsis and Jatropha using the β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene. In transgenic Arabidopsis and Jatropha, the inflorescence buds exhibited notable GUS activity, whereas the sepals did not. Against expectations, the JcAP1 promoter was active in the anthers of Arabidopsis and Jatropha and was highly expressed in Jatropha seeds. An analysis of promoter deletions in transgenic Arabidopsis revealed that deletion of the −1313/−1057 region resulted in loss of JcAP1 promoter activity in the inflorescence buds and increased activity in the anthers. These results suggested that some regulatory sequences in the −1313/−1057 region are essential for maintaining promoter activity in inflorescence buds and can partly suppress activity in the anthers. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that other elements located upstream of the 1.5 kb JcAP1 promoter may be required for flower-specific activation. The JcAP1 promoter characterized in this study can be used to drive transgene expression in both the inflorescence buds and seeds of Jatropha.


As a potential oilseed plant for renewable biodiesel production, Jatropha curcas (hereafter referred to as Jatropha), a member of the Euphorbiaceae family, has been studied for decades (Heller 1996; Sujatha et al. 2008; Divakara et al. 2010; de Argollo Marques et al. 2013). Considering the low genetic diversity of Jatropha (Tatikonda et al. 2009; Cai et al. 2010), transgenic breeding is a highly promising approach for directionally modifying characteristics of Jatropha in a short time, without the limitation of germplasm resources. To accelerate the process of the transgenic breeding of Jatropha, many efforts have been made to establish a genetic transformation system (Li et al. 2008; Joshi et al. 2010; Kumar et al. 2010; Pan et al. 2010) to analyze gene expression patterns (Chen et al. 2011; Sato et al. 2011; Li et al. 2015) and functions (Tang et al. 2011; Qu et al. 2012; Wei et al. 2012; Li et al. 2014). However, few studies have evaluated promoters in Jatropha. The CURCIN promoter (CP1) and curcin-L promoter (CP2) isolated from Jatropha have been characterized in tobacco, in which CP1 is specifically active in the seeds (Qin et al. 2009a), and CP2 is a leaf-specific promoter induced by stresses (Qin et al. 2009b). The JcNAC1 promoter is active in the roots, stems and leaves of seedlings, and JcNAC1 promoter activity can be induced in guard cells by drought (Qin et al. 2014). The JcSDP1 promoter is only active in Jatropha seeds, especially in the endosperm (Kim et al. 2014). The JcMFT1 promoter is highly active in transgenic Arabidopsis seeds and can be induced by ABA in germinating seeds (Tao et al. 2014). The JcUEP promoter could serve as an alternative to the CaMV35S promoter for driving the constitutive overexpression of transgenes in Jatropha (Tao et al. 2015). It needs more efforts to characterize more promoters in Jatropha, which is one of the crucial regulation factors for efficient expression of transgenes in Jatropha.

In this study, we focused on isolating a reproductive tissue-specific promoter in Jatropha because the seed yield can be improved by modifying the flowering trait (Pan and Xu 2011; Chen et al. 2014; Pan et al. 2014). APETALA1 (AP1) is a MADS-domain transcription factor gene that specifies floral meristem identity and functions as an A-class gene involved in floral organ formation (Mandel et al. 1992; Mena et al. 1995; Berbel et al. 2001; Litt and Kramer 2010; Chi et al. 2011). In Arabidopsis, AP1 acts a hub that mediates the switch from floral initiation to flower formation (Kaufmann et al. 2010). Overexpression of Arabidopsis AP1 in tomato and citrus results in early flowering and a reduction of the generation time in transgenic plants (Pena et al. 2001; Ellul et al. 2004). As expected, the Arabidopsis AP1 promoter is active in floral primordia and young floral buds produced from primary and secondary inflorescences (Chou et al. 2001; Guan et al. 2002); thus, it has been used as a flower-specific promoter to analyze gene function in flowers or to modify flower traits. The AP1 promoter directs the expression of the floral regulatory gene SUPERMAN (SUP) in Arabidopsis and tobacco, and the flowers of transgenic plants of both species exhibit fewer floral organs, consistent with an effect of SUP on cell proliferation (Yun et al. 2002). Expression of the cytokinin synthesis gene IPT4 driven by the AP1 promoter in Arabidopsis results in an increased flower number (Li et al. 2010). In the horticultural plant torenia, AP1:MYB24-SRDX transgenic plants produce open flowers with wavy petals and normal leaves, whereas 35S:MYB24-SRDX transgenic plants exhibit unopened flower buds and glossy dark green leaves with curled margins (Sasaki et al. 2011). The use of flower-specific promoters has the advantage of defining modifications in flowers rather than other organs.

Here, we isolated the Jatropha curcas APETALA1 (JcAP1) promoter and characterized its activity in Arabidopsis and Jatropha. In Arabidopsis, the JcAP1 promoter was active only in inflorescence buds and anthers, and we found that the −1313/−1057 region was essential for promoter activity in inflorescence buds. However, in addition to the inflorescence buds, the JcAP1 promoter was also highly active in Jatropha seeds.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Jatropha curcas plants cultivated in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China, were used as previously described (Pan and Xu 2011). The Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 ecotype, employed for transformation was grown at 22 °C with a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod.

qRT-PCR analysis in Jatropha

A cDNA sequence (GenBank accession no. KM610239) of the APETALA1 (AP1) gene was identified from our Jatropha flower cDNA library (Chen et al. 2014). Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed to examine the expression levels of JcAP1 in various organs of adult Jatropha plants, including the roots, stems, leaves, inflorescence buds, female flowers, male flowers, pericarps and seeds at 42 days after pollination (DAP). Total RNA was isolated (Ding et al. 2008) and reverse transcribed using the PrimeScript® RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (TAKARA). qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (TAKARA) using the Roche 480 real-time PCR detection system (Roche Diagnostics). All of the gene expression data obtained via qRT-PCR were normalized to the expression of JcGAPDH. The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Sequences of the primers used in this study

Cloning of the 5′ flanking region and determination of the transcription start site of JcAP1

The 5′ flanking region upstream of the translation start codon of JcAP1 was isolated from Jatropha genomic DNA through genome walking (Siebert et al. 1995). For nested PCR, the JcAP1 gene-specific primers GSP1 and GSP2 and the adaptor primers AP1 and AP2 were used. The JcAP1 promoter was amplified via PCR and cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector for sequencing. The putative cis-acting elements of the JcAP1 promoter were analyzed using the PLACE database (Higo et al. 1999). To identify the transcription start site of JcAP1, rapid amplification of 5′-cDNA ends (5′-RACE) was performed with total RNA from Jatropha male flowers using the SMARTer® RACE 5′/3′ Kit (Clontech). The primers employed for genome walking and 5′-RACE are listed in Table 1.

Construction of promoter-GUS fusions

To generate the JcAP1:GUS plasmid, XbaI and BamHI were used to digest pBI101 (Jefferson et al. 1987) and the pGEM-T Easy vector containing the 1.5 kb JcAP1 promoter. The two fragments were linked using T4 ligase (Promega). The resulting construct, JcAP1:GUS (Fig. 3b), was transferred to Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 and LBA4404 via electroporation (GenePulser Xcell, Bio-Rad). Strain EHA105 harboring the construct was employed to transform Arabidopsis; strain LBA4404 harboring the construct and pBI101 (promoterless, negative control, NC) was employed to transform Jatropha.

Plant transformation

Jatropha transformation was performed as described by Fu et al. (2015). After sterilization with 75 % (v/v) ethanol for 30 s, the mature seeds of Jatropha were sterilized with 10 % (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 20 min. The embryos were removed from the seeds, and cotyledon explants were cut from the base of the cotyledons, leaving 3/4 of the papery cotyledons for co-cultivation with Agrobacterium. In co-cultivation experiments, 50 μM acetosyringone was added to the MS-Jc1 medium (Pan et al. 2010). After 2 days of co-cultivation, the explants were cultured in MS-Jc1 medium with 100 mg/L timentin for a 10-day recovery period and then subcultured in shoot-inducing medium (SIM, MS-Jc1 medium with 40 mg/L kanamycin and 100 mg/L timentin). After selection, the regenerated shoots were transferred to rooting medium [RM, half strength (1/2) MS medium with 0.2 mg/L IBA, 0.1 mg/L NAA and 100 mg/L timentin]. Finally, the putative Jatropha transformants were examined via TAIL-PCR, and positive transgenic plants were cultivated in soil. Arabidopsis transformation was performed through the floral dip method (Clough and Bent 1998).

TAIL-PCR analysis

Thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR (TAIL-PCR) was performed with genomic DNA isolated from the leaves of the putative Jatropha transformants. The procedure was conducted as described by Liu et al. (1995). Three specific primers were designed based on the right border sequences of the T-DNA of pBI101. Four arbitrary degenerate (AD) primers (AD1, AD2, AD3 and AD4) and the T-DNA-specific primers XK314, XK315 and XK316 were employed to examine JcAP1:GUS transformants. The primers used for these assays are listed in Table 1. After the tertiary reaction, the TAIL-PCR products were sequenced and analyzed using the Jatropha Genome Database (

Histochemical and fluorometric GUS assay

For histochemical GUS staining, various tissues of transgenic Jatropha and Arabidopsis were incubated in GUS assay buffer with 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0), 0.5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 0.5 mM K4Fe(CN)6·3H2O, 0.5 % Triton X-100 and 1 mM X-Gluc at 37 °C overnight, then cleared in 70 % ethanol (Jefferson et al. 1987). The samples were examined via stereomicroscopy (Leica M80).

To examine the activity of the JcAP1 promoter in different tissues, a fluorometric GUS assay was performed following the protocol described by Jefferson et al. (1987), which was modified by adding 2 mM MUG to the reaction buffer. Fluorescence was examined with a Gemini XPS Microplate Spectrofluorometer (Molecular Devices Corporation). The protein concentrations of the plant extracts were measured using the Bradford method (1976).


The expression pattern of JcAP1 in Jatropha

We identified a cDNA of AP1 (GenBank accession no. KM610239) from our Jatropha flower cDNA library (Chen et al. 2014). JcAP1 encodes a MADS-box transcription factor that contains two conserved regions: a MADS-domain and a K domain (Fig. 1a). JcAP1 is highly similar to AP1 homologs from other plant species, and it is most closely related to PtAP1 from Populus trichocarpa (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1

A comparison of JcAP1 and its homologs. a Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of JcAP1 (accession No. KM610239) with that of Arabidopsis thaliana AP1 (accession No. CAA78909), FUL (accession No. NP_568929) and AP3 (accession No. BAA04665); Vitis vinifera VvAP1 (accession No. NP_001268210) and VvAP3 (accession No. ABN71371); Citrus sinensis CsAP1 (accession No. NP_001275828); Populus trichocarpa PtAP1 (accession No. XP_002311353); and Populus tomentosa PtAP3 (accession No. AAQ83493). Identically and partially conserved amino acid sequences are shown in black and gray, respectively. The conserved regions, MADS-domain and K domain of JcAP1 are indicated with overlining. b Phylogenetic analysis of JcAP1 and its homologs. The tree was constructed using MEGA 5.0 software and the neighbor-joining (N-J) method. The unrooted N-J dendrogram was generated from an alignment of the deduced amino acids with the ClustalW program. One thousand replicates were used for the bootstrap analysis. The scale bar indicates the average number of substitutions per site

To explore the expression pattern of JcAP1 in Jatropha, qRT-PCR was performed with total RNAs extracted from various tissues. The results indicated that JcAP1 is a flower-specific gene that is predominantly expressed in floral tissues, especially in inflorescence buds (Fig. 2). Because most AP1 genes are involved in the development of floral organs, we also examined JcAP1 expression in each organ of male and female Jatropha flowers. As shown in Fig. 2, JcAP1 was highly expressed in the sepals, while the levels in the petals and stamens were low in male flowers; in female flowers, the highest level was also found in the sepals, which was approximately two times that in the petals, and the expression level in the pistils was very low. The expression pattern of JcAP1 in floral organs was consistent with that of A-class genes in other plants (Coen and Meyerowitz 1991; Litt and Kramer 2010).

Fig. 2

Expression pattern of JcAP1 in Jatropha. Samples from adult plants: roots (R), stems (S), young leaves (YL), mature leaves (ML), inflorescence buds (IB), female flowers (FF), male flowers (MF), pericarps at 42 DAP (Pp 42 d), seeds at 42 DAP (Sd 42 d), male sepals (MS), male petals (MP), stamens (St), female sepals (FS), female petals (FP) and pistils (Pi). Equivalent qRT-PCR results were obtained from duplicate biological replicates. The error bars denote the SD from three technical replicates. The values were normalized to the expression of the reference gene JcGAPDH (Zhang et al. 2013)

Isolation and sequence analysis of the JcAP1 promoter

On the basis of expression data, a 1.5 kb JcAP1 promoter fragment (−1313/+150) (GenBank accession no. KM610240) was isolated from Jatropha by genome walking (Siebert et al. 1995). The transcription start site, determined by 5′-RACE, was located 150 nucleotides upstream of the translation start codon of JcAP1 (Fig. 3a). The putative cis-acting elements were analyzed using the PLACE database (Higo et al. 1999). The JcAP1 promoter sequence and putative plant regulatory elements are shown in Fig. 3a. The analysis revealed that the JcAP1 promoter contains a CArG box, which acts as a binding site for MADS-box proteins and is an important element mediating the regulatory effect on MADS-box genes (Tilly et al. 1998). Another important element of the promoter is a binding site (CCAATGT) for the LEAFY protein, which is a transcriptional factor that activates AP1 expression in Arabidopsis (Wagner et al. 1999). This promoter also contained some pollen-specific elements, including the POLLEN1LELAT52 motif and the GTGANTG10 motif, which are essential for the pollen-specific expression of tomato LAT52 and tobacco g10, respectively (Twell et al. 1991; Muschietti et al. 1994; Rogers et al. 2001).

Fig. 3

JcAP1 promoter sequence and promoter reporter gene construct. a Nucleotide sequence of the JcAP1 promoter. The transcription start site (+1) is in bold and italic. The start codon ATG is in bold and boxed. Putative regulatory elements on both strands are shown in bold and underlined. b Schematic representation of the T-DNA regions of the JcAP1:GUS binary vector used for transformation

Characterization of JcAP1 promoter activity in transgenic Arabidopsis

To test the activity of the promoter, JcAP1:GUS was transformed into Arabidopsis for preliminary analysis. GUS staining was examined in the T2 generation of five independent transgenic lines. The results showed that GUS activity was first detectable in the inflorescence buds and then in the anthers where pollen staining was intense (Fig. 4). The staining results in transgenic Arabidopsis indicated that the activity of the JcAP1 promoter was confined to flowers; however, the observed activity was not consistent with JcAP1 expression in Jatropha, which was abundant in the sepals rather than the stamens (Fig. 2). This result led us to hypothesize that the pollen-specific elements present in the JcAP1 promoter region may be hyperactive in the heterogeneous expression system.

Fig. 4

Histochemical GUS staining of transgenic Arabidopsis harboring the JcAP1:GUS fusion. a, b Inflorescence buds, c flowers. AI apical inflorescence buds, LI lateral inflorescence buds, An anthers. All bars are 0.5 mm

Deletion analysis of the JcAP1 promoter in transgenic Arabidopsis

A series of 5′ deletions of the JcAP1 promoter (Fig. 5a) were generated to analyze the regulatory effect of different regions of the promoter. After a histochemical GUS assay, we found that compared with the full-length promoter, GUS activity could not be detected in the inflorescence buds of all five deletions (D1–D5), whereas staining was still observed in the anthers, except in the D5 (Fig. 5b). The disappearance of GUS activity in the inflorescence buds of plants transformed with the D1 construct indicated that the −1313/−1057 region is essential for inflorescence bud specificity.

Fig. 5

Deletion analysis of the JcAP1 promoter. a Schematic representation of different JcAP1 promoter deletions (left panel) and the fluorometric assay of GUS activity in the anthers (right panel). FL full-length JcAP1 promoter, D1D5 five deletions. GTGA: GTGANTG10 motif (black vertical bars); AGAAA: POLLEN1LELAT52 motif (gray vertical bars). The presented GUS activity values are the averages from five independent transgenic lines from the T2 generation, and the error bars denote the SD. The GUS activities are expressed as nmol of 4-MU produced per min per mg of protein and were measured three times. b Histochemical GUS staining of transgenic Arabidopsis harboring deletions. If inflorescences, F flowers. All bars are 1 mm

To further investigate the regions of the JcAP1 promoter involved in the regulation of anther-specific activity, we detected GUS expression in the anthers of plants transformed with constructs containing the full-length sequence and deletions of the JcAP1 promoter. As shown in Fig. 5a, removing the −1313/−1057 region resulted in an increase in GUS expression for all of the deletions except for the shortest (D5), and D1 exhibited the highest expression level. This result indicated that the −1313/−1057region represses the activity of the JcAP1 promoter in anthers. Deletion of the −1057/−796 region from D1 to produce D2 led to a reduction of the GUS expression level, while further deletion to position −521 (D3) resulted in almost the same expression level observed for D2. Removal of the −521/−242 fragment from D3 to produce D4 caused a further decrease in the GUS expression level. Consistent with the GUS staining results, a fluorometric GUS assay revealed very low GUS activity for D5 (Fig. 5a, right panel). These results suggested that the −1057/−796 and −521/+19 regions are capable of inducing JcAP1 promoter activity in anthers, while the −796/−521 region shows no significant effects.

Characterization of JcAP1 promoter activity in transgenic Jatropha

Following evaluation in Arabidopsis, the JcAP1:GUS construct was transformed into Jatropha to characterize the activity of the JcAP1 promoter. Transformed plantlets were generated via kanamycin selection and validated through PCR amplification. Then, the PCR-positive transformants were examined via TAIL-PCR to confirm stable transgene integration. The T-DNA right border insert from pBI101 was used for integration analysis. The sequences of the T-DNA integration sites (i.e., the T-DNA/Jatropha genomic DNA junction regions) obtained from four transformant events (B1, B5, B12, and B14) selected randomly are listed below the sequence of the T-DNA right border of pBI101 in Table 2. The results showed that either the entire T-DNA right border sequence (B1 and B5) or part of it (B12 and B14) had been lost and that the transgenes were integrated into the genome of Jatropha transformants. In addition, the integration sites in the Jatropha genome were different between different insertion events, indicating that the plants were independent lines for the transformation event. The transgenic plantlets were grown in soil for further analysis.

Table 2 Sequence analysis of the T-DNA right border (underlined) and Jatropha genomic DNA (bold)

A histochemical GUS assay was first performed on regenerated transgenic shoots, and no GUS staining was observed (data not shown). After the transgenic plantlets had grown into the adult plants, various tissues, including roots, stems, young and mature leaves, shoot apices, inflorescence buds, female and male flowers, fruits at 12 DAP and seeds at 25 DAP, were collected for histochemical GUS assay. The results (Fig. 6) showed that GUS staining was strong in the shoot apices, inflorescence buds, male flowers and seeds; weak in the stems and female flowers, and absent from the roots, leaves and pericarps. No GUS staining was detected in the negative control. In male flowers, the anther was also stained (Fig. 6), which is consistent with the results from transgenic Arabidopsis (Fig. 4c). Thus, the activity of the JcAP1 promoter in anthers was not caused by the previously described heterogeneous expression. This result demonstrated that the JcAP1 promoter isolated here is active in anthers. Furthermore, the JcAP1 promoter is active in shoot apices and seeds, differing from the expectation of expression restricted to inflorescence buds and flowers.

Fig. 6

Histochemical GUS staining in various tissues of adult transgenic Jatropha plants (T0) harboring JcAP1:GUS and pBI101 (NC non-transgenic control). R roots, St stems, YL young leaves, ML mature leaves, SA shoot apices, IB inflorescence buds, FF female flowers, MF male flowers, Ft fruits at 12 DAP, Sd seeds at 25 DAP. All bars are 2 mm

Next, we compared JcAP1 promoter activity in different tissues of adult Jatropha plants via a fluorometric GUS assay. Tissues from five independent lines of the T0 generation were used for detection, including the roots, stems, young and mature leaves, shoot apices, inflorescence buds, female and male flowers, fruits at 12 DAP, pericarps, and seeds at 25 DAP. As shown in Fig. 7, the highest GUS expression level was detected in inflorescence buds, followed by the seeds at 25 DAP. The expression levels in shoot apices and male flowers were approximately equal but were less than half of the levels observed in seeds at 25 DAP. Although all four tissues exhibited clearly visible GUS staining, activity differed from the tissues. Consistent with the GUS staining results, fluorometric GUS activity in the stems, female flowers and fruits (12 DAP) was lower than in the shoot apices and male flowers. These results indicated that the JcAP1 promoter is primarily active in inflorescence buds and seeds (25 DAP).

Fig. 7

Fluorometric assay of GUS activity in adult transgenic Jatropha plants (T0). R roots, St stems, YL young leaves, ML mature leaves, SA shoot apices, IB inflorescence buds, MF male flowers, FF female flowers, Ft fruits at 12 DAP, Pp pericarps at 25 DAP, Sd seeds at 25 DAP. The presented values are the averages from five independent transgenic lines, and the error bars denote the SD. GUS activities were measured three times


AP1 is a MADS-box transcription factor that plays an important role in the initiation of flowering and floral organ formation (Kotoda et al. 2002; Murai et al. 2003; Huang et al. 2014). AP1 is first expressed in floral meristems and continues to be expressed in the outer whorls of the flower. In maize, ZAP1 expression is restricted to the inflorescences and non-reproductive organs of male and female flowers (Mena et al. 1995). Similar to ZAP1, a high expression level of JcAP1 was first detected in inflorescence buds and then in male and female sepals (Fig. 2). However, the expressions of other AP1 orthologs exhibit different patterns. CsAP1 from Citrus sinensis is expressed not only in the outer whorls of the sepal and petal, but also in the inner whorls of the stamen and carpel (Pillitteri et al. 2004). A hybrid aspen LAP1 was found to be expressed at a high level in the apex and may function mainly in seasonal growth rather than flowering (Azeez et al. 2014). In this study, because JcAP1 was shown to be flower-specific, we isolated its 5′-flanking region as a tissue-specific promoter and characterized this region in transgenic Arabidopsis and Jatropha.

The JcAP1 promoter showed marked activity in inflorescence buds in both transgenic Arabidopsis (Fig. 4) and Jatropha (Fig. 7), which was consistent with the JcAP1 expression pattern in Jatropha (Fig. 2). Through deletion analysis, we found that the −1313/−1057 region is essential for JcAP1 promoter activity in inflorescence buds. In addition, we identified a CArG box in this region, which is an important element mediating the regulatory effect of MADS-box proteins. In Arabidopsis, APETALA3 (AP3) is a MADS-box gene that functions in the control of petal and stamen development (Kramer et al. 1998). Three CArG boxes in the AP3 promoter mediate both positive and negative effects on the establishment and maintenance of the AP3 expression pattern (Tilly et al. 1998). Therefore, the absence of the CArG box in deletion constructs of the JcAP1 promoter (D1–D5, Fig. 5a) may completely abolish inflorescence bud activity. In floral organs, JcAP1 was expressed highly in sepals but was expressed at low levels in stamens. However, GUS staining was not observed in either Arabidopsis (Fig. 4c) or Jatropha sepals (Fig. 6); on the contrary, the anthers were stained, and Arabidopsis pollen showed intense staining (Fig. 4c). We also noted that the JcAP1 promoter contained some pollen-specific elements, including six POLLEN1LELAT52 motifs and five GTGANTG10 motifs, and promoter activity in the anthers decreased with the step-down numbers of these elements. In particular, deleting the −1057/−796 region, containing two GTGANTG10 motifs, and the −521/+19 region, containing five POLLEN1LELAT52 motifs, caused considerable loss of activity in the anthers (Fig. 5). Thus, we assumed that these elements confer the pollen-specific activity of the JcAP1 promoter. Moreover, when the −1313/−1057 region was removed, JcAP1 promoter activity in the anthers increased until the pollen-specific elements had been completely deleted; suggesting that the CArG box in the −1313/−1057 region repressed the pollen-specific elements. Similarly, the third CArG box (CArG3) in the Arabidopsis AP3 promoter is required to maintain a low level of gene expression during early floral stages, and the GUS expression level was found to increase when CArG3 was mutated (Tilly et al. 1998).

In addition, the JcAP1 promoter was unexpectedly active in regions beyond the flowers, showing a high expression level in the seeds of transgenic Jatropha. This result is consistent with seed-specific elements being present in this promoter, such as the E box (Kawagoe and Murai 1992; Stålberg et al. 1996), the DOF core sequence (Yanagisawa and Schmidt 1999), and the SEF motif (Lessard et al. 1991). The JcAP1 expression, however, was not detected in Jatropha seeds (Fig. 2). Similarly, the 920 bp potato ubi3 promoter was shown to be insufficient to achieve wound- and ethylene-dependent activation although native ubi3 expression in tubes is induced by wounding and ethylene treatments (Garbarino and Belknap 1994). Moreover, the gene internal sequences may also take part in the regulation of gene expression. The parsley 4CL-1 gene expression was developmentally regulated by light and stresses, such as pathogen infection, UV-irradiation and wounding. But the 4CL-1 promoter alone was only sufficient to direct gene cell-specific expression. Actually, the exonic sequences were required, in addition to the promoter, for the 4CL-1 gene expression induced by fungal elicitor or light treatment (Douglas et al. 1991). The Arabidopsis ACT2 promoter could not confer the strong expression of ACT2 throughout the vegetative tissues unless it was associated with the first intron (Jeong et al. 2009). Hence, because an isolated promoter may not reveal the full expression pattern of a gene, it is necessary to evaluate promoter activity in target plant species.

Taken together, our findings indicate that the cooperation of multiple cis-acting elements in the JcAP1 promoter is required to confer accurate activity in transgenic plants. Although the 1.5 kb JcAP1 promoter did not exhibit the same expression pattern in transgenic Arabidopsis and Jatropha as was observed for JcAP1 mRNA in Jatropha plants, this region could be used as a reproductive tissue-specific promoter in transgenic studies of Jatropha.

Author contribution statement

Y-B Tao and Z-F Xu designed research and wrote the paper, Y-B Tao performed research, L-L He helped in data analysis, and L-J Niu helped in collection of plant materials.


  1. Azeez A, Miskolczi P, Tylewicz S, Bhalerao RP (2014) A tree ortholog of APETALA1 mediates photoperiodic control of seasonal growth. Curr Biol 24:717–724

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berbel A, Navarro C, Ferrandiz C, Canas LA, Madueno F, Beltran JP (2001) Analysis of PEAM4, the pea AP1 functional homologue, supports a model for AP1-like genes controlling both floral meristem and floral organ identity in different plant species. Plant J 25:441–451

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai Y, Sun D, Wu G, Peng J (2010) ISSR-based genetic diversity of Jatropha curcas germplasm in China. Biomass Bioenerg 34:1739–1750

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen M-S, Wang G-J, Wang R-L, Wang J, Song S-Q, Xu Z-F (2011) Analysis of expressed sequence tags from biodiesel plant Jatropha curcas embryos at different developmental stages. Plant Sci 181:696–700

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen M-S, Pan B-Z, Wang G-J, Ni J, Niu L, Xu Z-F (2014) Analysis of the transcriptional responses in inflorescence buds of Jatropha curcas exposed to cytokinin treatment. BMC Plant Biol 14:318

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chi Y, Huang F, Liu H, Yang S, Yu D (2011) An APETALA1-like gene of soybean regulates flowering time and specifies floral organs. J Plant Physiol 168:2251–2259

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chou M-L, Haung M-D, Yang C-H (2001) EMF genes interact with late-flowering genes in regulating floral initiation genes during shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 42:499–507

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16:735–743

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM (1991) The war of the whorls—genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353:31–37

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Argollo Marques D, Siqueira WJ, Colombo CA, Ferrari RA (2013) Breeding and biotechnology of Jatropha curcas. In: Bahadur B, Sujatha M, Carels N (eds) Jatropha, challenges for a new energy crop. Volume 2: genetic improvement and biotechnology. Springer, New York, pp 457–478

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ding L-W, Sun Q-Y, Wang Z-Y, Sun Y-B, Xu Z-F (2008) Using silica particles to isolate total RNA from plant tissues recalcitrant to extraction in guanidine thiocyanate. Anal Biochem 374:426–428

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Divakara BN, Upadhyaya HD, Wani SP, Gowda CLL (2010) Biology and genetic improvement of Jatropha curcas L.: a review. Appl Energ 87:732–742

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Douglas CJ, Hauffe KD, Itesmorales ME, Ellard M, Paszkowski U, Hahlbrock K, Dangl JL (1991) Exonic sequences are required for elicitor and light activation of a plant defense gene, but promoter sequences are sufficient for tissue specific expression. EMBO J 10:1767–1775

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellul P, Angosto T, Garcia-Sogo B, Garcia-Hurtado N, Martin-Trillo M, Salinas M, Moreno V, Lozano R, Martinez-Zapater M (2004) Expression of Arabidopsis APETALA1 in tomato reduces its vegetative cycle without affecting plant production. Mol Breed 13:155–163

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fu Q, Li C, Tang M, Tao Y-B, Pan B-Z, Zhang L, Niu L, He H, Wang X, Xu Z-F (2015) An efficient protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas by optimizing kanamycin concentration and duration of delayed selection. Plant Biotechnol Rep 9:405–416

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Garbarino JE, Belknap WR (1994) Isolation of a ubiquitin-ribosomal protein gene (ubi3) from potato and expression of its promoter in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol 24:119–127

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guan X, Stege J, Kim M, Dahmani Z, Fan N, Heifetz P, Barbas CF 3rd, Briggs SP (2002) Heritable endogenous gene regulation in plants with designed polydactyl zinc finger transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:13296–13301

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Heller J (1996) Physic nut Jatropha curcas L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 1. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben/International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome

  20. Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Korenaga T (1999) Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res 27:297–300

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang H, Wang S, Jiang J, Liu G, Li H, Chen S, Xu H (2014) Overexpression of BpAP1 induces early flowering and produces dwarfism in Betula platyphylla x Betula pendula. Physiol Plant 151:495–506

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusion: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeong YM, Jung EJ, Hwang HJ, Kim H, Lee SY, Kim SG (2009) Roles of the first intron on the expression of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genes for actin and actin-binding proteins. Plant Sci 176:58–65

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Joshi M, Mishra A, Jha B (2010) Efficient genetic transformation of Jatropha curcas L. by microprojectile bombardment using embryo axes. Ind Crops Prod 33:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaufmann K, Wellmer F, Muino JM, Ferrier T, Wuest SE, Kumar V, Serrano-Mislata A, Madueno F, Krajewski P, Meyerowitz EM, Angenent GC, Riechmann JL (2010) Orchestration of floral initiation by APETALA1. Science 328:85–89

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kawagoe Y, Murai N (1992) Four distinct nuclear proteins recognize in vitro the proximal promoter of the bean seed storage protein β-phaseolin gene conferring spatial and temporal control. Plant J 2:927–936

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim MJ, Yang SW, Mao H-Z, Veena SP, Yin J-L, Chua N-H (2014) Gene silencing of Sugar-dependent 1 (JcSDP1), encoding a patatin-domain triacylglycerol lipase, enhances seed oil accumulation in Jatropha curcas. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kotoda N, Wada M, Kusaba S, Kano-Murakami Y, Masuda T, Soejima J (2002) Overexpression of MdMADS5, an APETALA1-like gene of apple, causes early flowering in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Sci 162:679–687

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kramer EM, Dorit RL, Irish VF (1998) Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics 149:765–783

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar N, Anand KGV, Pamidimarri D, Sarkar T, Reddy MP, Radhakrishnan T, Kaul T, Reddy MK, Sopori SK (2010) Stable genetic transformation of Jatropha curcas via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer using leaf explants. Ind Crop Prod 32:41–47

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lessard PA, Allen RD, Bernier F, Crispino JD, Fujiwara T, Beachy RN (1991) Multiple nuclear factors interact with upstream sequences of differentially regulated β-conglycinin genes. Plant Mol Biol 16:397–413

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li M, Li H, Jiang H, Pan X, Wu G (2008) Establishment of an Agrobacteriuim-mediated cotyledon disc transformation method for Jatropha curcas. Plant Cell Tiss Org 92:173–181

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li XG, Su YH, Zhao XY, Li W, Gao XQ, Zhang XS (2010) Cytokinin overproduction-caused alteration of flower development is partially mediated by CUC2 and CUC3 in Arabidopsis. Gene 450:109–120

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li C, Luo L, Fu Q, Niu L, Xu Z-F (2014) Isolation and functional characterization of JcFT, a FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) homologous gene from the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas. BMC Plant Biol 14:125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Li CQ, Luo L, Fu QT, Niu LJ, Xu ZF (2015) Identification and characterization of the FT/TFL1 gene family in the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas. Plant Mol Biol Rep 33:326–333

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Litt A, Kramer EM (2010) The ABC model and the diversification of floral organ identity. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21:129–137

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu YG, Mitsukawa N, Oosumi T, Whittier RF (1995) Efficient isolation and mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA insert junctions by thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR. Plant J 8:457–463

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mandel MA, Gustafsonbrown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF (1992) Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature 360:273–277

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mena M, Mandel MA, Lerner DR, Yanofsky MF, Schmidt RJ (1995) A characterization of the MADS-box gene family in maize. Plant J 8:845–854

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Murai K, Miyamae M, Kato H, Takumi S, Ogihara Y (2003) WAP1, a wheat APETALA1 homolog, plays a central role in the phase transition from vegetative to reproductive growth. Plant Cell Physiol 44:1255–1265

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Muschietti J, Dircks L, Vancanneyt G, Mccormick S (1994) Lat52 protein is essential for tomato pollen development: pollen expressing antisense Lat52 RNA hydrates and germinates abnormally and cannot achieve fertilization. Plant J 6:321–338

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pan BZ, Xu ZF (2011) Benzyladenine treatment significantly increases the seed yield of the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas. J Plant Growth Regul 30:166–174

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pan J, Fu Q, Xu ZF (2010) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of biofuel plant Jatropha curcas using kanamycin selection. Afr J Biotechnol 9:6477–6481

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pan B-Z, Chen M-S, Ni J, Xu Z-F (2014) Transcriptome of the inflorescence meristems of the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas treated with cytokinin. BMC Genom 15:974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pena L, Martin-Trillo M, Juarez J, Pina JA, Navarro L, Martinez-Zapater JM (2001) Constitutive expression of Arabidopsis LEAFY or APETALA1 genes in citrus reduces their generation time. Nat Biotechnol 19:263–267

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pillitteri LJ, Lovatt CJ, Walling LL (2004) Isolation and characterization of LEAFY and APETALA1 homologues from Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck ‘Washington’. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 129:846–856

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Qin XB, Zhang JP, Shao CX, Lin S, Jiang LD, Zhang SW, Xu Y, Chen F (2009a) Isolation and characterization of a curcin promoter from Jatropha curcas L. and its regulation of gene expression in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 27:275–281

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Qin XB, Zheng XJ, Shao CX, Gao JH, Jiang LD, Zhu XL, Yan F, Tang L, Xu Y, Chen F (2009b) Stress-induced curcin-L promoter in leaves of Jatropha curcas L. and characterization in transgenic tobacco. Planta 230:387–395

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Qin XB, Zheng XJ, Huang XQ, Lii YF, Shao CX, Xu Y, Chen F (2014) A novel transcription factor JcNAC1 response to stress in new model woody plant Jatropha curcas. Planta 239:511–520

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Qu J, Mao HZ, Chen W, Gao SQ, Bai YN, Sun YW, Geng YF, Ye J (2012) Development of marker-free transgenic Jatropha plants with increased levels of seed oleic acid. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:10

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Rogers HJ, Bate N, Combe J, Sullivan J, Sweetman J, Swan C, Lonsdale DM, Twell D (2001) Functional analysis of cis-regulatory elements within the promoter of the tobacco late pollen gene g10. Plant Mol Biol 45:577–585

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sasaki K, Yamaguchi H, Narumi T, Shikata M, Oshima Y, Nakata M, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M, Ohtsubo N (2011) Utilization of a floral organ-expressing AP1 promoter for generation of new floral traits in Torenia fournieri Lind. Plant Biotechnol 28:181–188

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sato S, Hirakawa H, Isobe S, Fukai E, Watanabe A, Kato M, Kawashima K, Minami C, Muraki A, Nakazaki N, Takahashi C, Nakayama S, Kishida Y, Kohara M, Yamada M, Tsuruoka H, Sasamoto S, Tabata S, Aizu T, Toyoda A, Shin-i T, Minakuchi Y, Kohara Y, Fujiyama A, Tsuchimoto S, Kajiyama S, Makigano E, Ohmido N, Shibagaki N, Cartagena JA, Wada N, Kohinata T, Atefeh A, Yuasa S, Matsunaga S, Fukui K (2011) Sequence analysis of the genome of an oil-bearing tree, Jatropha curcas L. DNA Res 18:65–76

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Siebert PD, Chenchik A, Kellogg DE, Lukyanov KA, Lukyanov SA (1995) An improved PCR method for walking in uncloned genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 23:1087–1088

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Stålberg K, Ellerstöm M, Ezcurra I, Ablov S, Rask L (1996) Disruption of an overlapping E-box/ABRE motif abolished high transcription of the napA storage-protein promoter in transgenic Brassica napus seeds. Planta 199:515–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sujatha M, Reddy TP, Mahasi MJ (2008) Role of biotechnological interventions in the improvement of castor (Ricinus communis L.) and Jatropha curcas L. Biotechnol Adv 26:424–435

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tang MJ, Liu XF, Deng HP, Shen SH (2011) Over-expression of JcDREB, a putative AP2/EREBP domain-containing transcription factor gene in woody biodiesel plant Jatropha curcas, enhances salt and freezing tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci 181:623–631

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Tao YB, Luo L, He LL, Ni J, Xu ZF (2014) A promoter analysis of MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 1 (JcMFT1), a seed-preferential gene from the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas. J Plant Res 127:513–524

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Tao YB, He LL, Niu LJ, Xu ZF (2015) Isolation and characterization of an ubiquitin extension protein gene (JcUEP) promoter from Jatropha curcas. Planta 241:823–836

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tatikonda L, Wani SP, Kannan S, Beerelli N, Sreedevi TK, Hoisington DA, Devi P, Varshney RK (2009) AFLP-based molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Sci 176:505–513

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tilly JJ, Allen DW, Jack T (1998) The CArG boxes in the promoter of the Arabidopsis floral organ identity gene APETALA3 mediate diverse regulatory effects. Development 125:1647–1657

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Twell D, Yamaguchi J, Wing RA, Ushiba J, Mccormick S (1991) Promoter analysis of genes that are coordinately expressed during pollen development reveals pollen-specific enhancer sequences and shared regulatory elements. Gene Dev 5:496–507

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wagner D, Sablowski RWM, Meyerowitz EM (1999) Transcriptional activation of APETALA1 by LEAFY. Science 285:582–584

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wei Q, Li J, Zhang L, Wu P, Chen Y, Li M, Jiang H, Wu G (2012) Cloning and characterization of a β-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase II from Jatropha curcas. J Plant Physiol 169:816–824

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Yanagisawa S, Schmidt RJ (1999) Diversity and similarity among recognition sequences of Dof transcription factors. Plant J 17:209–214

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Yun JY, Weigel D, Lee I (2002) Ectopic expression of SUPERMAN suppresses development of petals and stamens. Plant Cell Physiol 43:52–57

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang L, He L-L, Fu Q-T, Xu Z-F (2013) Selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression studies in the biofuel plant Jatropha curcas using real-time quantitative PCR. Int J Mol Sci 14:24338–24354

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31370595), the CAS 135 program (XTBG-T02), and the Top Science and Technology Talents Scheme of Yunnan Province (2009CI123). The authors gratefully acknowledge the Central Laboratory of the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden for providing research facilities.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeng-Fu Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tao, YB., He, LL., Niu, L. et al. Isolation and characterization of the Jatropha curcas APETALA1 (JcAP1) promoter conferring preferential expression in inflorescence buds. Planta 244, 467–478 (2016).

Download citation


  • Anther
  • Flower
  • Physic nut
  • Promoter
  • Seed