Abstract
Induction of plant resistance by herbivory is a complex process, which follows a temporal dynamic and varies spatially at the within-plant scale. This study aimed at improving the understanding of the induction process in terms of time scale and within-plant allocation, using apple tree seedlings (Malus × domestica) as plant model. Feeding preferences of a leaf-chewing insect (Spodoptera littoralis) for previously damaged and undamaged plants were assessed for six different time intervals with respect to the herbivore damage treatment and for three leaf positions. In addition, main secondary defense compounds were quantified and linked to herbivore feeding preferences. Significant herbivore preference for undamaged plants (induced resistance) was first observed 3 days after herbivore damage in the most apical leaf. Responses were delayed in the other leaf positions, and induced resistance decreased within 10 days after herbivore damage simultaneously in all tested leaf positions. Chemical analysis revealed higher concentrations of the flavonoid phloridzin in damaged plants as compared to undamaged plants. This indicates that herbivore preference for undamaged apple plants may be linked to phloridzin, which is the main secondary metabolite of apple leaves. The observed time course and distribution of resistance responses within plants contribute to the understanding of induction processes and patterns, and support the optimal defense theory stating young tissue to be prioritized. Moreover, induced resistance responses occurred also basipetally in leaves below the damage site, which suggests that signaling pathways involved in resistance responses are not unidirectional.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- RH:
-
Relative humidity
- L:
-
Larval instar
- CM:
-
Consumed dry mass
- CA:
-
Consumed area
- RA:
-
Remaining leaf disc area
- RM:
-
Remaining leaf disc dry mass
- CMu:
-
Consumed dry mass undamaged plant
- CMd:
-
Consumed dry mass damaged plant
- PI:
-
Preference index
- SE:
-
Standard error
References
Agrawal AA (2000) Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars. Oikos 89:493–500
Agrell J, Oleszek W, Stochmal A, Olsen M, Anderson P (2003) Herbivore-induced responses in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). J Chem Ecol 29:303–320
Anderson P, Agrell J (2005) Within-plant variation in induced defence in developing leaves of cotton plants. Oecologia 144:427–434
Anderson P, Jonsson M, Morte U (2001) Variation in damage to cotton affecting larval feeding preference of Spodoptera littoralis. Entomol Exp Appl 101:191–198
Arnold T, Appel H, Patel V, Stocum E, Kavalier A, Schultz J (2004) Carbohydrate translocation determines the phenolic content of Populus foliage: a test of the sink-source model of plant defense. New Phytol 164:157–164
Babst BA, Ferrieri RA, Gray DW, Lerdau M, Schlyer DJ, Schueller M, Thorpe MR, Orians CM (2005) Jasmonic acid induces rapid changes in carbon transport and partitioning in Populus. New Phytol 167:63–72
Baldwin IT, Preston CA (1999) The eco-physiological complexity of plant responses to insect herbivores. Planta 208:137–145
Ballhorn DJ, Schiwy S, Jensen M, Heil M (2008) Quantitative variability of direct chemical defense in primary and secondary leaves of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) and consequences for a natural herbivore. J Chem Ecol 34:1298–1301
Barton KE, Koricheva J (2010) The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterizing general patterns using meta-analysis. Am Nat 175:481–493
Bingham RA, Agrawal AA (2010) Specificity and trade-offs in the induced plant defence of common milkweed Asclepias syriaca to two lepidopteran herbivores. J Ecol 98:1014–1022
Boege K, Marquis RJ (2005) Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 20:441–448
Boege K, Dirzo R, Siemens D, Brown P (2007) Ontogenetic switches from plant resistance to tolerance: minimizing costs with age? Ecol Lett 10:177–187
Eichhorn MP, Nilus R, Compton SG, Hartley SE, Burslem D (2010) Herbivory of tropical rain forest tree seedlings correlates with future mortality. Ecology 91:1092–1101
Erb M, Lenk C, Degenhardt J, Turlings TCJ (2009) The underestimated role of roots in defense against leaf attackers. Trends Plant Sci 14:653–659
Escarpa A, Gonzalez MC (1998) High-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection for the determination of phenolic compounds in peel and pulp from different apple varieties. J Chromatogr A 823:331–337
Eyles A, Bonello P, Ganley R, Mohammed C (2010) Induced resistance to pests and pathogens in trees. New Phytol 185:893–908
Frost CJ, Hunter MD (2008) Herbivore-induced shifts in carbon and nitrogen allocation in red oak seedlings. New Phytol 178:835–845
Fulcher AF, Ranney TG, Burton JD, Walgenbach JF, Danehower DA (1998) Role of foliar phenolics in host plant resistance of Malus taxa to adult Japanese beetles. Hortscience 33:862–865
Gomez S, van Dijk W, Stuefer JF (2010) Timing of induced resistance in a clonal plant network. Plant Biol 12:512–517
Gosch C, Halbwirth H, Kuhn J, Miosic S, Stich K (2009) Biosynthesis of phloridzin in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Plant Sci 176:223–231
Heil M, Ton J (2008) Long-distance signalling in plant defence. Trends Plant Sci 13:264–272
Hern A, Dorn S (2001) Induced emissions of apple fruit volatiles by the codling moth: changing patterns with different time periods after infestation and different larval instars. Phytochemistry 57:409–416
Hern A, Dorn S (2002) Induction of volatile emissions from ripening apple fruits infested with Cydia pomonella and the attraction of adult females. Entomol Exp Appl 102:145–151
Howe GA (2004) Jasmonates as signals in the wound response. J Plant Growth Regul 23:223–237
Howe GA, Jander G (2008) Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:41–66
Hudgins JW, Ralph SG, Franceschi VR, Bohlmann J (2006) Ethylene in induced conifer defense: cDNA cloning, protein expression, and cellular and subcellular localization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase in resin duct and phenolic parenchyma cells. Planta 224:865–877
Hui X, Jin C (2004) Interspecific variation of plant traits associated with resistance to herbivory among four species of Ficus (Moraceae). Ann Bot 94:377–384
Jones CG, Coleman JS (1988) Leaf disk size and insect feeding preference: implications for assays and studies on induction of plant defense. Entomol Exp Appl 47:167–172
Jones CG, Hopper RF, Coleman JS, Krischik VA (1993) Control of systemically induced herbivore resistance by plant vascular architecture. Oecologia 93:452–456
Kaplan I, Halitschke R, Kessler A, Sardanelli S, Denno RF (2008a) Constitutive and induced defenses to herbivory in above- and belowground plant tissues. Ecology 89:392–406
Kaplan I, Halitschke R, Kessler A, Sardanelli S, Denno RF (2008b) Effects of plant vascular architecture on aboveground-belowground-induced responses to foliar and root herbivores on Nicotiana tabacum. J Chem Ecol 34:1349–1359
Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kindt M, Orsini MC, Costantini B (2007) Improved high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection method for the determination of phenolic compounds in leaves and peels from different apple varieties. J Chromatogr Sci 45:507–514
Lempa K, Agrawal AA, Salminen JP, Turunen T, Ossipov V, Ossipova S, Haukioja E, Pihlaja K (2004) Rapid herbivore-induced changes in mountain birch phenolics and nutritive compounds and their effects on performance of the major defoliator, Epirrita autumnata. J Chem Ecol 30:303–321
Leser C, Treutter D (2005) Effects of nitrogen supply on growth, contents of phenolic compounds and pathogen (scab) resistance of apple trees. Physiol Plant 123:49–56
Mattiacci L, Rudelli S, Rocca BA, Genini S, Dorn S (2001) Systemically-induced response of cabbage plants against a specialist herbivore, Pieris brassicae. Chemoecology 11:167–173
McCall AC, Fordyce JA (2010) Can optimal defence theory be used to predict the distribution of plant chemical defences? J Ecol 98:985–992
McGuire RJ, Johnson MTJ (2006) Plant genotype and induced responses affect resistance to herbivores on evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). Ecol Entomol 31:20–31
Metlen KL, Aschehoug ET, Callaway RM (2009) Plant behavioural ecology: dynamic plasticity in secondary metabolites. Plant Cell Environ 32:641–653
Mitchell MJ, Keogh DP, Crooks JR, Smith SL (1993) Effects of plant flavonoids and other allelochemicals on insect cytochrome P-450 dependent steroid hydroxylase-activity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 23:65–71
Mody K, Eichenberger D, Dorn S (2009) Stress magnitude matters: different intensities of pulsed water stress produce non-monotonic resistance responses of host plants to insect herbivores. Ecol Entomol 34:133–143
Mumm R, Hilker M (2006) Direct and indirect chemical defence of pine against folivorous insects. Trends Plant Sci 11:351–358
Ohnmeiss TE, Baldwin IT (2000) Optimal defense theory predicts the ontogeny of an induced nicotine defense. Ecology 81:1765–1783
Olson DM, Cortesero AM, Rains GC, Potter T, Lewis WJ (2009) Nitrogen and water affect direct and indirect plant systemic induced defense in cotton. Biol Control 49:239–244
Orians C (2005) Herbivores, vascular pathways, and systemic induction: facts and artifacts. J Chem Ecol 31:2231–2242
Petkovsek MM, Stampar E, Veberic R (2008) Increased phenolic content in apple leaves infected with the apple scab pathogen. J Plant Pathol 90:49–55
Philippe RN, Ralph SG, Mansfield SD, Bohlmann J (2010) Transcriptome profiles of hybrid poplar (Populus trichocarpa × deltoides) reveal rapid changes in undamaged, systemic sink leaves after simulated feeding by forest tent caterpillar (Malacosoma disstria). New Phytol 188:787–802
Picinelli A, Dapena E, Mangas JJ (1995) Polyphenolic pattern in apple tree leaves in relation to scab resistance: a preliminary study. J Agric Food Chem 43:2273–2278
Radhika V, Kost C, Bartram S, Heil M, Boland W (2008) Testing the optimal defence hypothesis for two indirect defences: extrafloral nectar and volatile organic compounds. Planta 228:449–457
Rhoades DF (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–54
Roach WA (1939) Plant injection as a physiological method. Ann Bot 3:155–226
Ruuhola T, Yang SY, Ossipov V, Haukioja E (2008) Foliar oxidases as mediators of the rapidly induced resistance of mountain birch against Epirrita autumnata. Oecologia 154:725–730
Schaller A, Ryan CA (1996) Systemin: a polypeptide defense signal in plants. Bioessays 18:27–33
Schieber A, Keller P, Carle R (2001) Determination of phenolic acids and flavonoids of apple and pear by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 910:265–273
Schittko U, Baldwin IT (2003) Constraints to herbivore-induced systemic responses: bidirectional signaling along orthostichies in Nicotiana attenuata. J Chem Ecol 29:763–770
Schwachtje J, Minchin PEH, Jahnke S, van Dongen JT, Schittko U, Baldwin IT (2006) SNF1-related kinases allow plants to tolerate herbivory by allocating carbon to roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12935–12940
Stoeckli S, Mody K, Gessler C, Patocchi A, Jermini M, Dorn S (2008) QTL analysis for aphid resistance and growth traits in apple. Tree Genet Genomes 4:833–847
Stoeckli S, Mody K, Gessler C, Christen D, Dorn S (2009) Quantitative trait locus mapping of resistance in apple to Cydia pomonella and Lyonetia clerkella and of two selected fruit traits. Ann Appl Biol 154:377–387
Stout MJ, Riggio MR, Yang Y (2009) Direct induced resistance in Oryza sativa to Spodoptera frugiperda. Environ Entomol 38:1174–1181
Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA, Irwin RE (2002) Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 17:278–285
Szankowski I, Flachowsky H, Li H, Halbwirth H, Treutter D, Regos I, Hanke MV, Stich K, Fischer TC (2009) Shift in polyphenol profile and sublethal phenotype caused by silencing of anthocyanidin synthase in apple (Malus sp.). Planta 229:681–692
Treutter D (2005) Significance of flavonoids in plant resistance and enhancement of their biosynthesis. Plant Biol 7:581–591
Underwood NC (1998) The timing of induced resistance and induced susceptibility in the soybean Mexican bean beetle system. Oecologia 114:376–381
Viswanathan DV, Thaler JS (2004) Plant vascular architecture and within-plant spatial patterns in resource quality following herbivory. J Chem Ecol 30:531–543
Wardlaw IF (1990) The control of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytol 116:341–381
Zhao T, Krokene P, Bjorklund N, Langstrom B, Solheim H, Christiansen E, Borg-Karlson AK (2010) The influence of Ceratocystis polonica inoculation and methyl jasmonate application on terpene chemistry of Norway spruce, Picea abies. Phytochemistry 71:1332–1341
Zong N, Wang CZ (2007) Larval feeding induced defensive responses in tobacco: comparison of two sibling species of Helicoverpa with different diet breadths. Planta 226:215–224
Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV, Niemela P, Haukioja E (1997) Delayed induced resistance and increase in leaf fluctuating asymmetry as responses of Salix borealis to insect herbivory. Oecologia 109:368–373
Acknowledgments
We thank Rafal Piskorski (ETHZ, Applied Entomology) for useful support in chemical analyses; Sybille Unsicker (MPI for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany) and Barbara Eder-Aebersold (ETHZ, Institute for Food Science) for their help in establishing and verifying the presented chemical method; Syngenta Switzerland for providing test insects; Lukas Rosinus (ETHZ, Seminar for Statistics) for statistical advice; Andreas Schaller (University Hohenheim, Germany) and Rafal Piskorski for fruitful discussions and constructive comments on the manuscript and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gutbrodt, B., Mody, K., Wittwer, R. et al. Within-plant distribution of induced resistance in apple seedlings: rapid acropetal and delayed basipetal responses. Planta 233, 1199–1207 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1371-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-011-1371-6