Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comment on “Open vs robotic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis on 1469 patients from the IMIGASTRIC prospective database”

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Lin JX, Reim D, Zheng CH, Borghi F, Cianchi F, Norero E, Nguyen NT, Qi F, Coratti A, Cesari M, Bazzocchi F, Alimoglu O, Brower ST, Pernazza G, D’Imporzano S, Azagra JS, Zhou YB, Cao SG, Guerra F, Liu T, Arcuri G, González P, Staderini F, Marano A, Di Nardo D, Parisi A, Huang CM, Tebala GD (2023) Open vs robotic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis on 1469 patients from the IMIGASTRIC prospective database. Langenbecks Arch Surg 408(1):302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03032-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Der Werf LR, Wijnhoven BPL, Fransen LFC, Van Sandick JW, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Busweiler LAD et al (2019) A national cohort study evaluating the association between short-term outcomes and long-term survival after esophageal and gastric cancer surgery. Ann Surg 270(5):868–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Jongh C, Triemstra L, van der Veen A, Brosens LAA, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Stoot JHMB, de Steur WO, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, Luyer MDP, Ponten JEH, Tegels JJW, Hulsewe KWE, Hartgrink HH, Wijnhoven BPL, Lagarde SM, Kouwenhoven EA, van Det MJ, Wassenaar EB, van Duijvendijk P, Draaisma WA, Broeders IAMJ, van der Peet DL, Gisbertz SS (2023) Surgical quality and prospective quality control of the D2-gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the multicenter randomized LOGICA-trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 49(10):107018. ISSN 0748–7983

  4. Lordick F et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 33(10):1005–1020

  5. Cui H, Zhang KC, Cao B, Deng H, Liu GB, Song LQ, Zhao RY, Liu Y, Chen L, Wei B (2022) Short and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. World J Gastrointest Surg 14(5):452–469

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kinami S (2022) The era of technology-focused gastric surgery is over: we should return to surgical oncology for gastric cancer—comment on the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. Dig Med Res 5:39

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.G.; writing—review and editing, L.G. and N.N.; supervision, A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigina Graziosi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graziosi, L., Natalizi, N. & Donini, A. Comment on “Open vs robotic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis on 1469 patients from the IMIGASTRIC prospective database”. Langenbecks Arch Surg 408, 407 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03150-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-03150-6

Navigation