Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for non-traumatic indications—a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) is an uncommon surgical procedure; usually, it is performed in traumatic cases, with non-traumatic indications being very rare. Our review aimed to offer a comprehensive descriptive overview of the characteristics of EPD in non-traumatic settings.

Methods

Our study is a review of individual participant data. PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Embase databases were searched. The last search was conducted in March 2022; studies that reported EPD for non-traumatic indications were included in the analysis.

Results

Twenty-six articles were identified, twenty-five providing individual participant data; 17 articles (68%) were case reports. One article was a large retrospective study on the NSQIP (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement) database, which enrolled 409 patients that underwent EPD for malignant causes. From the other studies, we extracted individual participant data for a total of 66 patients. The patients were divided in subgroups, based on the indication for surgery: malignant causes (39.39%), uncontrollable bleeding (19.69%), iatrogenic injuries (30.3%), perforations (4.54%), or ischemic causes (6.06%). The postoperative morbidity was higher for the perforation subgroup. Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the most common complication reported (21.21%); higher rates were reported in the malignant and bleeding subgroups, with no special mention of this complication in the NSQIP database study. Mortality rate was 10.3% in the NSQIP database and higher, 19.69% in the 66-patient cohort; the highest mortality rates were registered in the perforation and ischemic subgroup.

Conclusion

EPD is a complex surgical intervention, with important associated morbidity and mortality rates, higher than that in elective settings, although it can be a life-saving procedure in selected cases and should be performed only in high-experience centres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

M:

Male

R:

Rural

ERPC:

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

EGD:

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

UGIB:

Upper gastro-intestinal bleeding

PD:

Pancreaticoduodenectomy

EPD:

Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy

cl:

Classic Whipple

pp:

Pylorus-preserving

PG:

Pancreaticogastric anastomosis

PJ:

Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis

HJ:

Hepaticojejunostomy

JS:

Jejunostomy

PS:

Pancreaticostomy

HS:

Hepaticostomy

GS:

Gastrostomy

CPS:

Closure of pancreatic stump

HG:

Hepaticogastrostomy

TP:

Total pancreatectomy

po:

Postoperative days

BMI:

Body mass index

OR:

Operating room

POPF:

Postoperative pancreatic fistula

LOS:

Length of stay

NSQIP:

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement

References

  1. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Ann Surg 102:763–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244:10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery. Ann Surg 244:931–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Girard E, Abba J, Cristiano N, Siebert M, Barbois S, Létoublon C et al (2016) Management of splenic and pancreatic trauma. J Visc Surg 153:45–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coccolini F, Kobayashi L, Kluger Y, Moore EE, Ansaloni L, Biffl W et al (2019) Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 14:56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thal AP, Wilson RF (1964) A pattern of severe blunt trauma to the region of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 119:773–778

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Strobel O, Schneider L, Philipp S, Fritz S, Büchler MW, Hackert T (2015) Emergency pancreatic surgery—demanding and dangerous. Langenbecks Arch 400:837–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nentwich MF, Reeh M, Uzunoglu FG, Bachmann K, Bockhorn M, Izbicki JR et al (2016) Non-trauma emergency pancreatoduodenectomies: a single-center retrospective analysis. World J Surg 40:2261–2266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Driedger MR, Puig CA, Thiels CA, Bergquist JR, Ubl DS, Habermann EB et al (2020) Emergent pancreatectomy for neoplastic disease: outcomes analysis of 534 ACS-NSQIP patients. BMC Surg 20:169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lissidini G, Prete FP, Piccinni G, Gurrado A, Giungato S, Prete F et al (2015) Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy: when is it needed? A dual non-trauma centre experience and literature review. Int J Surg 21:S83-88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol 134:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, Riley RD, Simmonds M, Stewart G et al (2015) Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of individual participant data. JAMA 313:1657–1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;

  14. Lefrancois M, Gaujoux S, Resche-Rigon M, Chirica M, Munoz-Bongrand N, Sarfati E et al (2011) Oesophagogastrectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy for caustic injury. Br J Surg 98:983–990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Javed A, Pal S, Krishnan EK, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK (2012) Surgical management and outcomes of severe gastrointestinal injuries due to corrosive ingestion. World J Gastrointest Surg 4:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lupascu C, Ursulescu C, Andronic D (2013) Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for bleeding pancreatic pseudoaneurysm in patient with common mesentery and replaced right hepatic artery. Chirurgia (Bucur) 108:910–914

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lupascu C, Trofin A, Zabara M, Vornicu A, Cadar R, Vlad N et al (2017) Emergency backwards Whipple for bleeding: formidable and definitive surgery. Gastroenterology Research and Practice 2017:2036951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Testini M, Prete FP, Pasculli A, Piccinni G, Prete F (2016) Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for non-traumatic duodenopancreatic disease. HPB 18:E417–E418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu Y-F, Shin D-J, Yang H, Chen Y-X, Yu J-M (2018) The surgical choice of incidental periampullary carcinoma management in emergency laparotomy. Med Sci Monit 24:6359–6366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun M, Wei Y, Li S, Liu Z, Han X (2021) Emergency laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy as treatment for pancreatic head cancer-induced acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage, safe or not? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 10:146–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tuech J-J, Pessaux P, Rege N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud J-P (2001) Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy with delayed reconstruction for bleeding: a life saving procedure. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 29:59–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Z’graggen K, Strobel O, Schmied BM, Zimmermann A, Büchler MW. Emergency pancreatoduodenectomy in nontrauma patients. Pancreas. 2002;24:258–63

  23. Sakakima Y, Inoue S, Fujii T, Hatsuno T, Takeda S, Kaneko T et al (2004) Emergency pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy followed by second-stage pancreatojejunostomy for a gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the duodenum with an intratumoral gas figure: report of a case. Surg Today 34:701–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maeda H, Okabayashi T, Kobayashi M, Araki K, Kohsaki T, Nishimori I et al (2006) Emergency pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma in a patient with von Hipple-Lindau disease: a case report. Dig Dis Sci 51:1383–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stratigos P, Kouskos E, Kouroglou M, Chrisafis I, Fois L, Mavrogiorgis A et al (2007) Emergency pancreatoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) for massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding caused by a diffuse B-cell lymphoma of the duodenum: report of a case. Surg Today 37:680–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Standop J, Glowka T, Schmitz V, Schaefer N, Hirner A, Kalff JC (2010) Emergency Kausch-Whipple procedure. Pancreas 39:156–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Parray FQ, Lone IM, Chowdri NA, Wani I, Wani MA, Gulzar GM et al (2011) Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy in duodenal paraganglioma: case report. ISRN Surg 2011:268674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsai C-Y, Lai B-R, Wang S-Y, Liao C-H, Liu Y-Y, Kang S-C et al (2017) The impact of preoperative etiology on emergent pancreaticoduodenectomy for non-traumatic patients. World J Emerg Surg 12:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gulla A, Tan WP, Pucci MJ, Dambrauskas Z, Rosato EL, Kaulback KR et al (2014) Emergent pancreaticoduodenectomy: a dual institution experience and review of the literature. J Surg Res 186:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eftimie MA, Lungu V, Tudoroiu M, Vatachki G, Batca S, David L (2017) Emergency pancreatico-duodenectomy with superior mesenteric and portal vein resection and reconstruction using a gore-tex vascular graft. Chirurgia (Bucur) 112:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mirea CS, Ciorbagiu MC, Obleaga CV, Moraru E (2018) Stage IV duodenal GIST requiring emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy - diagnosis difficulties and therapeutic options. Rom J Morphol Embryol 59:543–548

    Google Scholar 

  32. Emiloju O, Candelario N, Dourado C (2020) Metastatic clear cell endometrial carcinoma: an unusual cause of a common clinical presentation. BMJ Case Rep 13:e235051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Loo G, Mohamad Abu Zeid W, Lim S, Ismail A (2017) Rare presentation of idiopathic duodenoduodenal intussusception. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 99:e188-90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Subbarayan R, Anand S, Selvaraj S (2020) Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for exsanguinating ampullary malignancy. Indian J Crit Care Med 24:1279–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Koichopolos J, Keow J, Parfitt J, Yoshy C, Wiseman D, Leslie K (2020) Complete duodenal necrosis associated with non-traumatic duodenal hematoma requiring emergent pancreatico-duodenectomy. Int J Surg Case Rep 66:53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yagi S, Ida S, Ohashi M, Kumagai K, Hiki N, Sano T et al (2019) Two cases of a perforated duodenal diverticulum after gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Surg Case Rep 5:169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hecker A, Hecker B, Bassaly B, Hirschburger M, Schwandner T, Janßen H et al (2010) Dramatic regression and bleeding of a duodenal GIST during preoperative imatinib therapy: case report and review. World J Surg Oncol 8:47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dumitrascu T, Ionescu MI, David L, Popescu I (2011) Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy in a patient with an ampullary adenocarcinoma associated with severe acute pancreatitis: a case report. Chirurgia (Bucur) 106:409–413

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kamei K, Yasuda T, Nakata Y, Yamazaki M, Ishikawa H, Nakai T et al (2012) Gastrointestinal bleeding as the initial manifestation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma successfully treated by emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy: case report. Acta Med Kinki Univ 37:95–97

    Google Scholar 

  40. Okabayashi T, Shima Y, Iwata J, Sumiyoshi T, Kozuki A, Tokumaru T et al (2013) Primary liposarcoma of the duodenum: a first case presentation. Internal Med 52:2753–2757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Varshney VK, Nayar R, Sreesanth KS, Soni S, Varshney B. Emergency pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary cancer post-iatrogenic duodenal perforation: no option but to strike. Cureus. 2020;e11384.

  42. Nickel F, Haney CM, Kowalewski KF, Probst P, Limen EF, Kalkum E et al (2020) Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 271:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hüttner FJ, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, Seiler CM, Antes G, Büchler MW, et al. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016.

  44. Seykora TF, Ecker BL, McMillan MT, Maggino L, Beane JD, Fong ZV et al (2019) The beneficial effects of minimizing blood loss in pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 270:147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schorn S, Demir IE, Vogel T, Schirren R, Reim D, Wilhelm D, et al. Mortality and postoperative complications after different types of surgical reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy—a systematic review with meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch. 2019;404.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CP, DS and NA created the study design. The data collection was done by DS, CP and FZ. DS, CP and MC were involved in data analysis and interpretation. DS, CP and MC have written the manuscript. NA and MC substantially revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Schlanger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (50.7 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Popa, C., Schlanger, D., Chirică, M. et al. Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for non-traumatic indications—a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 3169–3192 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02702-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02702-6

Keywords

Navigation