Abstract
Purpose
Pancreatic surgery is a complex operation that has been associated with severe intraoperative and postoperative complications, especially in patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS). Our study aimed to assess the impact of PAS on pancreatic surgery.
Methods
A total of 1430 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery were included in this retrospective study and classified into the following 3 groups: previous upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) (n = 135); previous lower abdominal surgery (PLAS) (n = 161), and no history of abdominal surgery (non-PAS) (n = 1134). Using propensity score matching (PSM), patients were matched to one another at a 1:1:1 ratio with balanced baseline characteristics. Intraoperative factors, surgical complications, hospital costs, and postoperative hospitalization were collected and compared.
Results
A longer operative duration was observed in the PUAS group compared to the non-PAS group (187.54 vs. 150.50 min, p = 0.016). The intraoperative blood loss in the PUAS group was significantly higher (193.68 vs. 150.51 and 156.81 mL, p < 0.05), while the intraoperative plasma transfusion volume was higher in PLAS patients than in non-PAS patients (183.8 vs. 102.7 mL, p = 0.008). Intra-abdominal adhesions in PUAS patients were most severe, and non-PAS patients exhibited significantly lower intra-abdominal adhesion grading (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, postoperative histopathology, postoperative hospitalization, or hospital cost.
Conclusion
PAS has no significant influences on surgical outcomes, and pancreatic surgery is relatively safe in this patient population. A patient history of PAS may prolong operation duration and increase intraoperative blood loss but has no impact on postoperative complications and does not increase the economic burden.
Similar content being viewed by others
Code availability
Not applicable.
Change history
21 July 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02544-2
References
Berry AJ (2013) Pancreatic surgery: Indications, complications, and implications for nutrition intervention. Nutr Clin Pract 28:330–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533612470845
Mavros MN, Velmahos GC, Lee J et al (2014) Morbidity related to concomitant adhesions in abdominal surgery. J Surg Res 192:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.044
Okabayashi K, Ashrafian H, Zacharakis E et al (2014) Adhesions after abdominal surgery: a systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity. Surg Today 44(3):405–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0591-8
Mcguigan A, Kelly P, Turkington RC et al (2018) Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 24:4846–4861. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4846
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Klotz R, Larmann J, Klose C et al (2020) Gastrointestinal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy with epidural vs patient-controlled intravenous analgesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 155(7):e200794. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0794
Hanna MM, Gadde R, Allen CJ et al (2016) Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Res 202:380–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.12.053
Ahn KS, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2011) Laparoscopic liver resection in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery. World J Surg 35:1333–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1073-z
Ahn KS, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2011) Laparoscopic liver resection in patients with a history of upper abdominal surgery. World J Surg 35(6):1333–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1073-z
Beck DE, Ferguson MA, Opelka FG et al (2000) Effect of previous surgery on abdominal opening time. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1749–1753. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236862
Nanashima A, Abo T, Hamasaki K et al (2013) Predictive parameters of intraoperative blood loss in patients who underwent pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 60:1217–1221. https://doi.org/10.5754/hge11376
Chong Y, Koh YX, Teo JY et al (2021) Impact of non-liver-related previous abdominal surgery on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resections: a propensity score-matched controlled study. Surg Endosc 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08321-4
Sahakyan MA, Tholfsen T, Kleive D et al (2021) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy following prior upper abdominal surgery (pancreatectomy and prior surgery). J Gastrointest Surg 25(7):1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04858-2
Du Y, Chen G, Zhang P et al (2020) Effect of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. J Surg Res 247:197–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.023
Zeng WG, Liu MJi, Zhou ZX et al (2015) Impact of previous abdominal surgery on the outcome of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a case-control study in 756 patients. J Surg Res 199(2):345–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.022
Ten Broek RP, Strik C, Issa Y et al (2013) Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 258:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826f4969
Ten Broek RP, Issa Y, Van Santbrink EJ et al (2013) Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ 347:f5588. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5588
Peng L, Cao J, Xiao Hu et al (2019) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 65:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.021
Major P, Droś J, Kacprzyk A et al (2018) Does previous abdominal surgery affect the course and outcomes of laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:997–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.03.025
Kim SH, Lee SD, Kim YK et al (2017) Right hepatectomy in living donors with previous abdominal surgery. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 16:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60146-7
Acknowledgements
The authors thank colleagues at the Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery in Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to this manuscript and are in agreement with the content. The authors contributed as follows: study conception and design: Kai-lian Zheng, Xiao-yi Yin, and Gang Jin; acquisition of data: Kai-lian Zheng, Xiao-yi Yin, and Hao-yu Gu; analysis and interpretation of data: Kai-lian Zheng, Xiao-yi Yin, and Hao-yu Gu; drafting of manuscript: Kai-lian Zheng, Xiao-yi Yin, and Hao-yu Gu; and critical revision of the manuscript: Chang-jin Li, Chen-ming Ni, Guo-xiao Zhang, Huan Wang, and Zhen Wang.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. The Ethics Committee of Naval Medical University has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Kai-lian Zheng, Xiao-yi Yin, and Hao-yu Gu contributed equally to this work and are considered as co-first authors.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, Kl., Yin, Xy., Gu, Hy. et al. Impact of previous upper/lower abdominal surgery on pancreatic surgical outcomes and complications: a propensity score matching study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 1517–1524 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02494-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02494-9