Skip to main content
Log in

Reoperative bariatric surgery after primary laparoscopic gastric plication for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic gastric plication (LGP) often requires reoperative bariatric surgery (RBS) due to complications and insufficient weight loss. The aim of our study was to assess perioperative morbidity and weight loss during follow-up in patients undergoing RBS after primary LGP for morbid obesity.

Methods

A search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using (“conversion”OR “revision*”"OR “reoperat*”)AND(“gastric”OR “curvatur*”)AND “plication.” Studies were deemed eligible if data on RBS after LGP were provided. For each study, data were extracted and analyzed.

Results

In the literature review, 291 articles were screened and 7 included. The studies covered a total of 367 patients, of whom 119 received a sleeve gastrectomy (SG), 85 a Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB), 75 a one anastomosis-gastric bypass (OAGB), 45 a re-LGP, and 25 a jejuno-ileal bypass. After RBS, excess weight loss was 50.8 ± 6.5% at 6 months, 71.0 ± 7.7% at 12 months, and 89.0 ± 7.8% at 24 months. Operative time was 101.3 ± 14.6 min. Postoperatively, 18/255 patients (7.1%) had a complication, and leakage and reoperations were reported in 6/255 (2.4%) and 5/255 (2.0%) patients, respectively. Length of hospital stay was 3.1 ± 2.4 days. The quality of evidence was rated as “very low.”

Conclusions

Despite limitations, this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that RBS after LGP has an acceptable rate of complications and is effective in terms of excess weight loss during follow-up. No specific operation (e.g., SG, RYGB, OAGB) can be suggested over another due to the lack of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Nanni G, Castagneto M, Bornstein S, Rubino F (2015) Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:964–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00075-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Hutter MM, Kothari SN, Mattar SG, Brethauer SA, Morton JM (2020) American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis 16:457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gandhi D, Boregowda U, Sharma P, Ahuja K, Jain N, Khanna K, Gupta N (2021) A review of commonly performed bariatric surgeries: imaging features and its complications. Clin Imaging 72:122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Vetter D, Kröll D, Borbély Y, Schultes B, Beglinger C, Drewe J, Schiesser M, Nett P, Bueter M (2018) Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.20897

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchwald H (2014) The evolution of metabolic/bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 24:1126–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1354-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tretbar LL, Taylor TL, Sifers EC (1976) Weight reduction. Gastric plication for morbid obesity. J Kans Med Soc 77:488–490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Talebpour M, Amoli BS (2007) Laparoscopic total gastric vertical plication in morbid obesity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:793–798. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2006.0128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Park YH, Kim SM (2017) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic greater curvature plication and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with a body mass index of 30 to 35 kg/m2. Yonsei Med J 58:1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2017.58.5.1025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Skrekas G, Antiochos K, Stafyla VK (2011) Laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication: results and complications in a series of 135 patients. Obes Surg 21:1657–1663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0499-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fried M, Dolezalova K, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW, Sramkova P, Ribaric G (2012) Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) for treatment of morbid obesity in a series of 244 patients. Obes Surg 22:1298–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0684-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer HHG, Riauka R, Dambrauskas Z, Mickevicius A (2021) The effect of surgical gastric plication on obesity and diabetes mellitus type 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 16:10–18. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2020.97424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel S, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ (2011) Reasons and outcomes of reoperative bariatric surgery for failed and complicated procedures (excluding adjustable gastric banding). Obes Surg 21:1209–1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0234-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suarez DF, Gangemi A (2021) How bad is “bad ”? A cost consideration and review of laparoscopic gastric plication versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 31:307–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05018-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Malik PRA, Doumouras AG, Malhan RS, Lee Y, Boudreau V, Barlow K, Karpinski M, Anvari M (2021) Obesity, cancer, and risk reduction with bariatric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 101:239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2020.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA (2011) The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:401–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walter SD, Yao X (2007) Effect sizes can be calculated for studies reporting ranges for outcome variables in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 60:849–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. DerSimonian R, Laird N (2015) Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials 45:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Sayes IA, Abdelbaki TN, Elkeleny MR, Sharaan MA (2021) Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure after failed gastric plication in morbidly obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 31:284–289. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hassan M, Attia M, Lasheen M (2020) Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass as revisional surgery for failed laparoscopic gastric plication. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery 39:1144–1147

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chahine E, Alkandari M, De Simone B, Dirani M, D’Alessandro A, Saikaly E, Gumbs A, Cartillone MC, Crispo L, Chouillard MA, Kassir R, Chouillard E (2020) Weight regain after gastric plication: reoperative sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass?-Analysis of 116 Consecutive Cases. Obes Surg 30:3982–3987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04767-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yavuz E, Aktokmakyan V, Gulcicek O, Yigitbas H, Ercetin C, Tokocin M, Cayoren H, Bugdayci N, Celebi F, Solmaz A (2019) Revisional surgery after gastric plication: replication or sleeve? Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care 14:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1089/bari.2018.0029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heidari R, Talebpour M, Soleyman-Jahi S, Zeinoddini A, Sanjari Moghaddam A, Talebpour A (2019) Outcomes of reoperation after laparoscopic gastric plication failure. Obes Surg 29:376–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3522-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zerrweck C, Rodríguez JG, Aramburo E, Vizcarra R, Rodríguez JL, Solórzano A, Maydón HG, Sepúlveda EM (2017) Revisional surgery following laparoscopic gastric plication. Obes Surg 27:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2242-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Albanese A, Prevedello L, Verdi D, Nitti D, Vettor R, Foletto M (2015) Laparoscopic gastric plication: an emerging bariatric procedure with high surgical revision rate. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care 10:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/bari.2015.0002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramos A, Galvao Neto M, Galvao M, Evangelista LF, Campos JM, Ferraz A (2010) Laparoscopic greater curvature plication: initial results of an alternative restrictive bariatric procedure. Obes Surg 20:913–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0132-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nasser H, Munie S, Kindel TL, Gould JC, Higgins RM (2020) Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 16:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gray KD, Moore MD, Elmously A, Bellorin O, Zarnegar R, Dakin G, Pomp A, Afaneh C (2018) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic revisional bariatric surgery in a complex patient population. Obes Surg 28:1852–1859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3119-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moon RC, Segura AR, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA (2020) Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted bariatric conversions and revisions. Surg Obes Relat Dis 16:1080–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. King K, Galvez A, Stoltzfus J, Claros L, El Chaar M (2021) Robotic-assisted surgery results in a shorter hospital stay following revisional bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 31:634–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05022-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gero D, Vannijvel M, Okkema S, Deleus E, Lloyd A, Menzo EL, Tadros G, Raguz I, Martin AS, Kraljević M, Mantziari S, Frey S, Gensthaler L, Sammalkorpi H, Garcia-Galocha JL, Zapata A, Tatarian T, Wiggins T, Bardisi E, Goreux JP, Seki Y, Vonlanthen R, Widmer J, Thalheimer A, Kasama K, Himpens J, Hollyman M, Welbourn R, Aggarwal R, Beekley A, Sepulveda M, Torres A, Juuti A, Salminen P, Prager G, Iannelli A, Suter M, Peterli R, Boza C, Rosenthal R, Higa K, Lannoo M, Hazebroek EJ, Dillemans B, Clavien PA, Puhan M, Raptis DA, Bueter M (2021) Defining global benchmarks in elective secondary bariatric surgery comprising conversional, revisional and reversal procedures. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000005117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Filip S, Hutopila I, Copaescu C (2019) Re-sleeve gastrectomy - an efficient revisional bariatric procedure - 3 years results. Chirurgia (Bucur) 114:809–823. https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.114.6.809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Parmar CD, Gan J, Stier C, Dong Z, Chiappetta S, El-Kadre L, Bashah MM, Wang C, Sakran N (2020) One anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional bariatric surgery after failed primary adjustable gastric band (LAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG): a systematic review of 1075 patients. Int J Surg 81:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Al-Sabah S, Al Haddad E, Akrof S, Alenezi K, Al-Subaie S (2020) Midterm results of revisional bariatric surgery postsleeve gastrectomy: resleeve versus bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 16:1747–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.06.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Weir CJ, Butcher I, Assi V, Lewis SC, Murray GD, Langhorne P, Brady MC (2018) Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 18:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0483-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: FM, ZH, MM, DLR, FG. Acquisition of data: ZH, FM, FV, RP. Analysis and interpretation of data: FM, MM, RP, FG. Drafting of manuscript: ZH, MM, FV, DLR. Critical revision of manuscript: FM, RP, FG.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Mongelli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mongelli, F., Horvath, Z., Marengo, M. et al. Reoperative bariatric surgery after primary laparoscopic gastric plication for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 1839–1850 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02485-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02485-w

Keywords

Navigation