Abstract
Background
Parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion is an underestimated and undertreated condition with significant impact on quality of life. However, its surgical treatment is challenging and prone to complications and the optimal surgical treatment of this condition remains to be determined.
Methods
In this article, we describe our surgical techniques in the minimally invasive treatment of ileal conduit parastomal hernia and present our preliminary results. In a retrospective single-center design, a prospectively maintained database was screened. Data from all patients undergoing surgical treatment for a parastomal hernia after cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion in our center were collected.
Results
Between May 2016 and June 2020, 15 patients underwent minimally invasive repair of a parastomal hernia of an ileal conduit. Details on the surgical approach are provided, along with a flow chart to standardize the choice of surgical technique, depending on the presence of a concomitant midline incisional hernia and perioperative findings. The majority of patients were treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (10/15; 66.7%). Median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days. One-third of patients developed a postoperative urinary infection. Median follow-up was 366 days. One patient developed a local recurrence of her parastomal hernia on day 66 postoperatively, treated with intraperitoneal mesh.
Conclusion
The minimally invasive surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary diversion poses specific perioperative challenges that require a broad surgical armamentarium and a tailored approach. Preliminary results confirm a significant morbidity after this type of surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gakis G, Efstathiou J, Lerner S, Cookson M, Keegan K, Guru K et al (2013) International Consultation on Urologic Disease-European Association of Urology Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012. ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: Radical cystectomy and bladder preservation for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 63(1):45–57
Bricker EM (1950) Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg Clin North Am 30(5):1511–1521
Su J, Hoy N, Fafaj A, Tastaldi L, Strong A, Rosen M et al (2021) The European Hernia Society classification applied to the rare cases of parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary diversion: a retrospective cohort of 96 patients. Hernia 25(1):125–131
Narang S, Alam N, Campain N, Pathak S, McGrath J, Daniels I et al (2017) Parastomal hernia following cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review. Hernia 21(2):163–175
Gore J, Litwin M (2009) Urologic diseases in America project. Quality of care in bladder cancer: trends in urinary diversion following radical cystectomy. World J Urol 27(1):45–50
Śmietański M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre J, Berger D, Bury K, Conze J et al (2014) European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia 18(1):1–6
Rezaee M, Goldwag J, Goddard B, Bihrle W, Viazmenski A, Wilson M et al (2020) Parastomal hernia development after cystectomy and ileal conduit for bladder cancer: results from the Dartmouth ileal conduit enhancement (DICE) project. Can J Urol 27(5):10369–10377
Liedberg F, Kollberg P, Allerbo M, Baseckas G, Brändstedt J, Gudjonsson S et al (2020) Preventing parastomal hernia after ileal conduit by the use of a prophylactic mesh: a randomised study. Eur Urol 78(5):757–763
Tenzel P, Williams Z, McCarthy R, Hope W (2018) Prophylactic mesh used in ileal conduit formation following radical cystectomy: a retrospective cohort. Hernia 22(5):781–784
Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault G, DeBeaux A, Dietz U, Jeekel J et al (2012) EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 16:239–250
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P (2004) Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–13
Pauli E, Juza R, Winder J (2016) How I do it: novel parastomal herniorrhaphy utilizing transversus abdominis release. Hernia 20(4):547–552
Hansson B, Slater N, van der Velden A, Groenewoud H, Buyne O, de Hingh I et al (2012) Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg 255(4):685–695
De Robles M, Young C (2020) Parastomal hernia repair with onlay mesh remains a safe and effective approach. BMC Surg 20(1):296
Faba O, Rosales A, Breda A, Palou J, Gaya J, Esquena S et al (2011) Simplified technique for parastomal hernia repair after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit creation. Urology 77(6):1491–1494
Franks M, Hrebinko R (2001) Technique of parastomal hernia repair using synthetic mesh. Urology 57(3):551–553
Helal M, Austin P, Spyropoulos E, Pow-Sang J, Persky L, Lockhart J (1997) Evaluation and management of parastomal hernia in association with continent urinary diversion. J Urol 157(5):1630–1632
Safadi B (2004) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: early results. Surg Endosc 18(4):676–680
Ho K, Fawcett D (2004) Parastomal hernia repair using the lateral approach. BJU Int 94(4):598–602
Tully K, Roghmann F, Pastor J, Noldus J, von Bodman C (2019) Parastomal hernia repair with 3-d mesh implants after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion - a single-center experience using a purpose made alloplastic mesh implant. Urology 131:245–249
Ayuso S, Shao J, Deerenberg E, Elhage S, George M, Heniford B et al (2020) Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: technique and outcomes. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02328-x (Epub ahead of print)
Fitzgerald M, Ullrich S, Singh K, Misholy O, Kingham P, Brady M (2018) Parastomal hernia repair using the “top hat” technique - an initial experience in 30 patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Am J Surg 216(3):465–470
Olmi S, Oldani A, Uccelli M, Scotto B, Cesana G, Ciccarese F et al (2019) Laparoscopic modified keyhole technique with coated polyester mesh for treatment of parastomal hernia: measures for improving the outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29(5):681–684
Dewulf M, Aspeslagh L, Nachtergaele F, Pletinckx P, Muysoms F (2021) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after previous transabdominal prostatectomy. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08497-9 (Epub ahead of print)
Grossi J, Lee B, Belyansky I, Carbonell A, Cavazzola L, Novitsky Y et al (2021) Critical view of robotic-assisted transverse abdominal release (r-TAR). Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02391-y (Epub ahead of print)
Christopher A, Fowler C, Patel V, Mellia J, Morris M, Broach R et al (2021) Bilateral transversus abdominis release: complex hernia repair without sacrificing quality of life. Am J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.020 (Epub ahead of print)
Sadava E, Peña M, Bras Harriott C, Casas M, Schlottmann F, Laxague F (2021) Long-term outcomes and quality of life assessment after posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR). Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08402-4 (Epub ahead of print)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
M. Dewulf, P. Pletinckx, F. Nachtergaele, F. Ameye, P. Dekuyper, and N. Hildebrand have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. F. Muysoms reports having received research grants from Intuitive, Medtronic, Dynamesh and received speakers honorarium from Medtronic, Bard-Davol, Dynamesh, Intuitive, WL Gore, and received consultancy fees from Medtronic, Intuitive, CMR Surgical.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dewulf, M., Pletinckx, P., Nachtergaele, F. et al. How-I-do-it: minimally invasive repair of ileal conduit parastomal hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 1291–1301 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02393-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02393-5