Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A propensity score matching study between conventional and soft fiber-optic choledochoscope guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy for treatment of cholelithiasis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) provides an alternative method for cholelithiasis treatment. Since conventional rigid choledochoscope applied in PTCSL lacks high flexibility and high-resolution vision, we developed a new, soft fiber-optic choledochoscope (SFCS) to solve these problems.

Objective

We aim to verify the safety and efficacy of PTCSL guided by the newly developed choledochoscope, SCFS.

Methods

In this study, a total of 58 patients undergoing PTCSL from November, 2020 to December, 2020 in Zhuhai People’s Hospital were enrolled, including 32 patients undergoing conventional PTCSL and 26 patients undergoing SFCS-guided PTCSL. A method of propensity score matching was used in order to balance the pre-operative indexes of the two groups. As a result, a total of 21 pairs (1:1) were created. SFCS-guided PTCSL was performed on patients in the SFCS group for the treatment of cholelithiasis. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, immediate clearance rate, final clearance rate, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative complication rate, and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. A 6-month follow-up was performed for the two groups.

Results

SFCS-guided PTCSL represents safe and effective treatment outcomes. The immediate clearance rate and final clearance rate in the SFCS group were significantly higher than that of the conventional group. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization days, and recurrence rate in the SFCS group were significantly lower than that of the conventional group.

Conclusions

SFCS applied in PTCSL appears to be a safe and effective method for the treatment of cholelithiasis.

This study has been registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as required by legislation (Registration number: ChiCTR1800016864, Registration time: 2018/02/08).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data could be accessed via the email address of the corresponding author.

References

  1. Park JS, Jeong S, Lee DH, Bang BW, Lee JI, Lee JW et al (2013) Risk factors for long-term outcomes after initial treatment in hepatolithiasis. J Korean Med Sci 28:1627–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Suzuki Y, Mori T, Yokoyama M, Yang CC, Yeh YH, Chou DA et al (2014) Hepatolithiasis: analysis of Japanese nationwide surveys over a period of 40 years. J HepatobiliaryPancreat Sci 21:617–622

    Google Scholar 

  3. Silsirivanit A, Sawanyawisuth K, Riggin GJ, Wongkham C (2014) Cancer biomarker discovery for cholangiocarcinoma: the high-throughput approaches. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim HJ, Kim JS, Suh SJ, Lee BJ, Park JJ, Lee HS et al (2015) Cholangiocarcinoma risk as longterm outcome after hepatic resection in the hepatolithiasis patients. World J Surg 39:1537–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeng X, Tao H (2015) Diagnostic and prognostic serum marker of cholangiocarcinoma. Oncol Lett 9:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sato Y, Sasaki M, Harada K, Nakanuma Y (2014) Pathological diagnosis of flat epithelial lesions of the biliary tract with emphasis on biliary intraductalneoplasia. J Gastroenterol 49:64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang J, Huang Q, Lin XS (2014) The analysis on the methods and curative effect of iatrogenic bile duct injury reparation operation: a clinicol analysis of 102 cases. J Hepatobiliary Surg 79(3):585–590

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miura F, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Pitt HA, Gouma DJ et al (2013) TG13 flowchart for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wei LJ, Wei CT, Xing YX (2013) The clinical experience of endoscopic minimally invasive gallbladder-sparing cholelithotomy: with a report of 56 cases. Journal of Laparoseopic Surgery 24(8):666–669

    Google Scholar 

  10. Osipenko MF, Litvinova NV, Voloshina NB, Frolov IaA (2013) Long-term dynamics of gastrointestinal symptoms after cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis. KlinMed(Mosk) 91(5):49–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ye X, Ni K, Zhou X, Xie K, Hong X (2015) Laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. J Surg Res 199:402–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JH, Kim HW, Kang DH, Choi CW, Park SB, Kim SH et al (2013) Usefulness of percutaneous transhepaticcholangioscopic lithotomy for removal of difficult common bile duct stones. Clin Endosc 46:65–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koc B, Karahan S, Adas G, Cheng B, Jin X (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration an d endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 206:457–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Narayanan SK, Chen Y, Narasimhan KL, Cohen RC (2013) Hepaticoduodenostomy versus hepaticojejunostomy after resection of choledochal cyst: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J PediatrSurg 48(11):2336–2342

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jin H, Fan J, Li W, Cui M (2019) Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy using soft fiber-optic choledochoscope. Z Gastroenterol 57(10):1196–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tian J, Li JW, Chen J, Fan YD, Bie P, Wang SG (2013) Laparoscopic hepatectomy with bile duct exploration for the treatment of hepatolithiasis: an experience of 116 cases. Dig Liver Dis 45:493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yasuda I, Itoi T (2013) Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones. Dig Endosc 25:376–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen YY, Chen CC (2017) Cholelithiasis New England J Med 377(4):371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JH, Kim HW, Kang DH, Choi CW, Park SB, Kim SH, Jeon UB (2013) Usefulness of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy for removal of difficult common bile duct stones. Clin Endosc 46(1):65–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhuo H, Chen Z, Lin R, Yang S, Zhuang H, He C, Liu X (2020) Percutaneous Transhepatic Choledochoscopic Lithotomy (PTCSL) is effective for the treatment of intrahepatic and extrahepatic choledocholithiasis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 31(3):326–330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang P, Tao H, Liu C, Zhou X, Sun B, Zhu C et al (2021) One-step percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy in patients with cholelithiasis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 45(2):101477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Uchiyama K, Kawai M, Ueno M, Ozawa S, Tani M, Yamaue H (2007) Reducing residual and recurrent stones by hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 11(5):626–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Zhuhai People’s Hospital (Zhuhai hospital affiliated with Jinan University) for providing the necessary support for our study.

Funding

The study was funded by the Medical Research Program of Guangdong Provincial Health Bureau (Grant No. 2020424).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Cui M proposed the study. Cui M and Jin H performed the research and wrote the first draft. Both authors contributed to the design and interpretation of the study and to further drafts. Cui M is the guarantor.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Cui.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Our study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Zhuhai People’s Hospital (No. 2019–6). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review boards of Zhuhai People’s Hospital (Zhuhai, China) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as required by legislation (Registration number: ChiCTR1800016864).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from the individual participant included in the study.

Consent for publication

The participants gave consent for his personal and clinical details along with any identifying images to be published in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, H., Cui, M. A propensity score matching study between conventional and soft fiber-optic choledochoscope guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy for treatment of cholelithiasis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 675–683 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02359-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02359-7

Keywords

Navigation