Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frailty index as a predictive preoperative tool in the elder population undergoing major abdominal surgery: a prospective analysis of clinical utility

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The geriatric population has increased considerably in the last decades. Such increases come along with new challenges for surgical practitioners, who now face a risen number of frail patients in need of major operations. The value of frailty indexes in this setting has been discussed recently. This study assessed the modified Rockwood frailty index (mRFI) as a predictive tool for postoperative complications in older adults subjected to major abdominal operations and correlated it with other scores widely utilized for this purpose.

Methods

We performed a prospective study utilizing the mRFI including all patients older than 65 years subjected to major abdominal surgery between May 2017 and May 2019 in a third-level academic center. A comparison between frail (mRFI >0.25) and non-frail patients (mRFI <0.25) was performed. We performed logistic regression to identify predictors of postoperative complications and 30-day mortality. We analyzed the correlation between mRFI and ACS-NSQIP, P-POSSUM, PMP, and Charlson score risk calculators.

Results

One hundred forty patients were included in our study, of whom 49 (35%) were identified as frail. Frail patients demonstrated significantly prolonged hospital stay (p<.0001), ICU admission rates (p=0.004), hospital readmissions (p=0.007), and higher mortality rates (p=0.02). Our univariate analysis associated frailty (mRFI>0.25), ASA >III, increased age, and BMI with postoperative complications. In our multivariate analysis, frailty remained an independent predictor for postoperative complications (OR 6.38, 95% CI [2.45–16.58], p<0.001). Frailty was also associated with length of stay (LOS) regardless of the type of surgery (OR 3.35, 95% CI [0.37–6.33], p= 0.03). mRFI>0.25 demonstrated a sensitivity (Se) of 70% and specificity (Sp) 67% with area under the curve (AUC) 0.75 for perioperative complications, Se 69% and Sp 70% with AUC 0.74 for ICU admissions, and Se 83% and Sp 68% with AUC 0.83 for mortality.

Conclusion

Frail patients demonstrated significantly prolonged hospital stay, ICU admission rates, hospital readmissions, and higher mortality rates. mRFI is an independent predictor for perioperative complications with a Se of 70% and Sp 67% and AUC 0.75.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services (2011) A profile of older Americans: 2011-administration on aging.

  2. Joseph B, Phelan H, Hassan A, Orouji Jokar T, O’Keeffe T, Azim A, Gries L, Kulvatunyou N, Latifi R, Rhee P (2016) The impact of frailty on failure-to-rescue in geriatric trauma patients: a prospective study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81(6):1150–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rivera-Silva G et al (2018) El envejecimiento de la población mexicana. Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social 56(1):116

    Google Scholar 

  4. González Montalvo JI, Pérez del Molino J, Rodríguez Mañas L, Salgado Alba A, Guillén Llera F (1991) GERIATRIA Y ASISTENCIA GERIATRICA: PARA QUIEN COMO (I). Med Clin 96(5):183–188

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clegg A et al (2013) Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381(9868):752–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Desserud KF, Veen T, Søreide K (2016) Emergency general surgery in the geriatric patient. Br J Surg 103(2):e52–e61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim S-w, Han H-S, Jung H-w, Kim K-i, Hwang DW, Kang S-B, Kim C-H (2014) Multidimensional frailty score for the prediction of postoperative mortality risk. JAMA Surg 149(7):633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson RE (2013) Short and long-term mortality after appendectomy in Sweden 1987 to 2006. Influence of appendectomy diagnosis, sex, age, co-morbidity, surgical method, hospital volume, and time period. A national population-based cohort study. World J Surg 37(5):974–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dasgupta M, Rolfson DB, Stolee P, Borrie MJ, Speechley M (2009) Frailty is associated with postoperative complications in older adults with medical problems. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 48(1):78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Joseph B, Pandit V, Zangbar B, Kulvatunyou N, Hashmi A, Green DJ, O’Keeffe T, Tang A, Vercruysse G, Fain MJ, Friese RS, Rhee P (2014) Superiority of frailty over age in predicting outcomes among geriatric trauma patients: a prospective analysis. JAMA Surg 149(8):766–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Joseph B, Zangbar B, Pandit V, Fain M, Mohler MJ, Kulvatunyou N, Jokar TO, O'Keeffe T, Friese RS, Rhee P (2016) Emergency general surgery in the elderly: too old or too frail? J Am Coll Surg 222(5):805–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Searle SD et al (2008) A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr 8(1):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mullen MG, Michaels AD, Mehaffey JH, Guidry CA, Turrentine FE, Hedrick TL, Friel CM (2017) Risk associated with complications and mortality after urgent surgery vs elective and emergency surgery: implications for defining “quality” and reporting outcomes for urgent surgery. JAMA Surg 152(8):768–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A (2005) A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Cmaj 173(5):489–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saint John's University Physics Department (2006) Exact r×c contingency table. SJU, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  16. Joseph B, Pandit V, Rhee P, Aziz H, Sadoun M, Wynne J, Tang A, Kulvatunyou N, O’Keeffe T, Fain MJ, Friese RS (2014) Predicting hospital discharge disposition in geriatric trauma patients: is frailty the answer? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(1):196–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A (2007) A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Med Sci 62(7):738–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson TN et al (2011) Frailty predicts increased hospital and six-month healthcare cost following colorectal surgery in older adults. Am J Surg 202(5):511–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson TN, Wallace JI, Wu DS, Wiktor A, Pointer LF, Pfister SM, Sharp TJ, Buckley MJ, Moss M (2011) Accumulated frailty characteristics predict postoperative discharge institutionalization in the geriatric patient. J Am Coll Surg 213(1):37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. López-Herranz GP, Torres-Gómez OG (2017) Variability of the physical status classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists among anesthesiologists at the Hospital General of Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología 40(3):190–194

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ihejirika RC, Thakore RV, Sathiyakumar V, Ehrenfeld JM, Obremskey WT, Sethi MK (2015) An assessment of the inter-rater reliability of the ASA physical status score in the orthopaedic trauma population. Injury 46(4):542–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, Syin D, Bandeen-Roche K, Patel P, Takenaga R, Devgan L, Holzmueller CG, Tian J, Fried LP (2010) Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 210(6):901–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Racz J et al (2012) Elective and emergency abdominal surgery in patients 90 years of age or older. Can J Surg 55(5):322–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohil RS, Bhatnagar D, Bahadur L, Rajneesh, Dev DK, Magan M (2004) POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Br J Surg 91(4):500–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Eamer G, al-Amoodi MJH, Holroyd-Leduc J, Rolfson DB, Warkentin LM, Khadaroo RG (2018) Review of risk assessment tools to predict morbidity and mortality in elderly surgical patients. Am J Surg 216(3):585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, Peters D, Rubinfeld I (2013) Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database. J Surg Res 183(1):104–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saxton A, Velanovich V (2011) Preoperative frailty and quality of life as predictors of postoperative complications. Ann Surg 253(6):1223–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design was made by JLAF, JHRQ, PMV, and HMF. Acquisition of data was made by JLAF, JHRQ, PMV, JMM, and FPS. Analysis and interpretation of data was made by JLAF, PMV, CMV, and HMF. Drafting of the manuscript was made by JLAF, JHRQ, JMM, FPS, CMV, and HMF. Critical revision and approval of the manuscript was made by JLAF, JHRQ, CMV, and HMF.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Humberto Rodríguez-Quintero.

Ethics declarations

This research was performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments and was approved by our institutional ethics committee.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the patients involved in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this article have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Rockwood frailty questionnaire

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguilar-Frasco, J.L., Rodríguez-Quintero, J.H., Moctezuma-Velázquez, P. et al. Frailty index as a predictive preoperative tool in the elder population undergoing major abdominal surgery: a prospective analysis of clinical utility. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406, 1189–1198 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02128-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02128-6

Keywords

Navigation