Skip to main content
Log in

Modern diagnosis and treatment of hiatal hernias

  • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Hiatal hernias are a common finding on radiographic or endoscopic studies. Hiatal hernias may become symptomatic or, less frequently, can incarcerate or become a volvulus leading to organ ischemia. This review examines latest evidence on the diagnostic workup and management of hiatal hernias.

Methods

A literature review of contemporary and latest studies with highest quality of evidence was completed. This information was examined and compiled in review format.

Results

Asymptomatic hiatal and paraesophageal hernias become symptomatic and necessitate repair at a rate of 1% per year. Watchful waiting is appropriate for asymptomatic hernias. Symptomatic hiatal hernias and those with confirmed reflux disease require operative repair with an anti-reflux procedure. Key operative steps include the following: reduction and excision of hernia sac, 3 cm of intraabdominal esophageal length, crural closure with mesh reinforcement, and an anti-reflux procedure. Repairs not amenable to key steps may undergo gastropexy and gastrostomy placement as an alternative procedure.

Conclusions

Hiatal hernias are commonly incidental findings. When hernias become symptomatic or have reflux disease, an operative repair is required. A minimally invasive approach is safe and has improved outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE (2008) Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22:601–616

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Paterson WG, Kolyn DM (1994) Esophageal shortening induced by short-term intraluminal acid perfusion in opossum: a cause for hiatus hernia? Gastroenterology 107:1736–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Landreneau R et al (1992) Clinical spectrum of paraesophageal herniation. Dig Dis Sci 37:537–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hutter MM (2007) Paraesophageal and other complex diaphragmatic hernias. In: Yeo CJ (ed) Shackelford’s surgery of the alimentary tract. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 549–562

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peters JH (2013) SAGES guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 27:4407–4408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hill LD (1973) Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia. A surgical emergency. Am J Surg 126:286–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2002) Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg 236:492–500 discussion 500-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearson JB, Gray JG (1967) Oesophageal hiatus hernia: long-term results of the conventional thoracic operation. Br J Surg 54:530–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Draaisma WA et al (2005) Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair: a review of literature. Surg Endosc 19:1300–1308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Velanovich V, Karmy-Jones R (2001) Surgical management of paraesophageal hernias: outcome and quality of life analysis. Dig Surg 18:432–437 discussion 437-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hashemi M et al (2000) Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective followup reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg 190:553–560 discussion 560-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frantzides CT et al (2002) A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 137:649–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Granderath FA et al (2005) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 140:40–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oelschlager BK et al (2011) Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 213:461–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Basso N et al (1999) “Tension-free” hiatoplasty, gastrophrenic anchorage, and 360 degrees fundoplication in the laparoscopic treatment of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9:257–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Casaccia M et al (2002) Laparoscopic physiological hiatoplasty for hiatal hernia: new composite “A”-shaped mesh. Physical and geometrical analysis and preliminary clinical results. Surg Endosc 16:1441–1445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morris-Stiff G, Hassn A (2008) Laparoscopic paraoesophageal hernia repair: fundoplication is not usually indicated. Hernia 12:299–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Poulose BK et al (2008) Inpatient mortality analysis of paraesophageal hernia repair in octogenarians. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1888–1892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sihvo EI et al (2009) Fatal complications of adult paraesophageal hernia: a population-based study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:419–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Iqbal A et al (2006) Assessment of diaphragmatic stressors as risk factors for symptomatic failure of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 10:12–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Steve R Siegal MD—conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, and critical revision of manuscript; James P Dolan MD, MCR—conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, and critical revision of manuscript; John G Hunter MD—conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, and critical revision of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John G. Hunter.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This manuscript received no funding.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research involving human participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not necessary for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siegal, S.R., Dolan, J.P. & Hunter, J.G. Modern diagnosis and treatment of hiatal hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402, 1145–1151 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1606-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1606-5

Keywords

Navigation