Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery—retrospective analysis of anthropometric features

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The vast majority of studies published on robot-assisted thyroid surgery are South Korean. This study aims to assess the impact of certain anthropometric parameters on performing robot-assisted thyroid surgery on Caucasian patients.

Materials and methods

A total of 91 patients underwent robot-assisted surgery by the axillary approach in the Fifth Surgical Clinic, City Hospital Cluj-Napoca, between 2010 and 2015. Besides the specific clinical and pathological parameters, a series of anthropometric parameters and the postoperative occurrence of skin disorders in the cervical or subclavicular region were determined for each patient.

Results

There was an increase in dissection time and console time, which was directly proportional to the patients’ body mass index. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with different body mass indices. The postoperative drainage volume was significantly higher in overweight or obese patients. The time needed to visualize the thyroid lodge was longer in patients with wider shoulders, and there was a negative correlation between neck length and console time. A statistically significant direct correlation was found between the clavicle length–neck length ratio and the duration of the entire intervention. There was no significant influence of any of these parameters on the duration of hospitalization or the occurrence of other postoperative complications.

Conclusions

The nutritional status of the patients and the other anthropometric parameters influenced the duration and difficulty of the intervention, without affecting its safety in terms of intra- and postoperative- complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Linos D, Chung WY (2012) Minimally invasive thyroidectomy. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Linos D (2011) Minimally invasive thyroidectomy: a comprehensive appraisal of existing techniques. Surgery 150(1):17–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lang BH, Wong CK, Tsang JS, Wong KP (2014) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between robotic-assisted thyroidectomy and non-robotic endoscopic thyroidectomy. J Surg Res 191(2):389–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee J, Chung WY (2013) Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection: past, present, and future. Cancer J 19(2):151–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park KN, Cho SH, Lee SW (2015) Nationwide multicenter survey for current status of endoscopic thyroidectomy in Korea. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 8(2):149–154

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson NR, Yao L, Tufano RP, Kandil EH (2014) Safety of robotic thyroidectomy approaches: meta-analysis and systematic review. Head Neck 36(1):137–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee J, Chung WY (2013) Robotic surgery for thyroid disease. Eur Thyroid J 2(2):93–101

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang YC, Liu K, Xiong JJ, Zhu JQ (2015) Robotic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer: meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol 129(6):558–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hinson AM, Kandil E, O’Brien S, Spencer HJ, Bodenner DL, Hohmann SF, et al. (2015) Trends in robotic thyroid surgery in the United States from 2009 through 2013. Thyroid 25(8):919e926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perrier ND (2012) Why I have abandoned robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery. Surgery 152(6):1025–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arora A, Garas G, Sharma S, Muthuswamy K, Budge J, Palazzo F, Darzi A, Tolley N (2016) Comparing transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy with conventional surgery in a UK population: a case control study. Int J Surg 27:110–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee S, Park S, Lee CR, Son H, Kim J, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chung WY, Park CS (2013) The impact of body habitus on the surgical outcomes of transaxillary single-incision robotic thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients. Surg Endosc 27(7):2407–2414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. OECD (2014) Obesity update June 2014 http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Obesity-Update-2014.pdf

  14. Axente DD, Major ZZ, Micu CM, Constantea NA (2013) Technical particularities of the robot-assisted trans-axillary thyroidectomy. Chirurgia 108(3):422–428

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chung WJ (2011) The evolution of robotic thyroidectomy: from inception to neck dissection. J Robotic Surg 5:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hinson AM, Kandil E, O’Brien S, Spencer HJ, Bodenner DL, Hohmann SF, Stack BC Jr (2015) Trends in robotic thyroid surgery in the United States from 2009 through 2013. Thyroid 25(8):919–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kandil E, Hammad AY, Walvekar RR, Hu T, Masoodi H, Mohamed SE, Deniwar A, Stack BC Jr (2015) Robotic Thyroidectomy Versus Nonrobotic Approaches: A Meta-Analysis Examining Surgical Outcomes. Surg Innov pii: 1553350615613451. [Epub ahead of print]

  18. Lallemant B, Chambon G, Galy-Bernadoy C, et al. (2013) Transaxillary robotic thyroid surgery: a preliminary European experience. Eur Thyroid J 2(2):110–115

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kandil EH, Noureldine SI, Yao L, Slakey DP (2012) Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: an examination of the first one hundred cases. J Am Coll Surg 214(4):558–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Axente DD, Silaghi H, Silaghi CA, Major ZZ, Micu CM, Constantea NA (2013) Operative outcomes of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery for benign thyroid disease: early experience in 50 patients. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 398(6):887–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Ahn YH, Soh EY, Chung WY (2010) Differences in postoperative outcomes, function, and cosmesis: open versus robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 24(12):3186–3194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Author contribution

Study concept and design, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript drafting: D.D. Axente.

Critical revision of the manuscript: N.A. Constantea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Damian Axente.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its additional amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Ethical standards/informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to their inclusion in the study.

Additional information

Presented (partially) at the Third South Eastern European Robotic Surgery Society (SEERSS) International Congress in Robotic Surgery on 3–4 October 2014 Sofia, Bulgaria

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Axente, D.D., Constantea, N.A. Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery—retrospective analysis of anthropometric features. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401, 975–981 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1505-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1505-1

Keywords

Navigation