Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cholangitis in the postoperative course after biliodigestive anastomosis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hepatobiliary surgery with biliodigestive anastomosis (BDA) results in a loss of the sphincter of Oddi with consecutive ascension of bacteria into the bile system which may cause cholangitis in the postoperative course.

Methods

Patients who received reconstruction with a BDA after hepatobiliary surgery were analyzed retrospectively for their postoperative course of disease depending on intraoperatively obtained bile cultures and antibiotic prophylaxis.

Results

Two hundred forty-three patients were included in the analysis, 49.4 % of whom had received endoscopic stenting before the operation. Stenting was significantly associated with the presence of drug-resistant bacteria in the intraoperatively obtained bile sample (p < 0.001, OR = 4.09). Of all patients, 14.4 % developed postoperative cholangitis. This was significantly associated with the postoperative length of stay in the intensive care unit (p = 0.002, OR = 1.035). The highest incidence of postoperative cholangitis was found in patients with cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 12, p = 0.046, OR = 2.178). Patients were more likely to harbor strains with resistance against the antibiotic that was given intraoperatively.

Conclusion

The risk for the presence of drug-resistant bacteria is increased by preoperative stenting of the common bile duct. Bile culture by intraoperative swabs can be altered by the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis as it induces microbiological selection in the common bile duct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mosler P (2011) Diagnosis and management of acute cholangitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 13(2):166–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Lent AU, Bartelsman JF, Tytgat GN, Speelman P, Prins JM (2002) Duration of antibiotic therapy for cholangitis after successful endoscopic drainage of the biliary tract. Gastrointest Endosc 55(4):518–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanau LH, Steigbigel NH (2000) Acute (ascending) cholangitis. Infect Dis Clin N Am 14(3):521–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jinkins LJ, Parmar AD, Han Y et al (2013) Current trends in preoperative biliary stenting in patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgery 154(2):179–189

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lai EC, Mok FP, Tan ES et al (1992) Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis. N Engl J Med 326(24):1582–1586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sudo T, Murakami Y, Uemura K et al (2007) Specific antibiotic prophylaxis based on bile cultures is required to prevent postoperative infectious complications in pancreatoduodenectomy patients who have undergone preoperative biliary drainage. World J Surg 31(11):2230–2235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitahata Y, Kawai M, Tani M et al (2014) Preoperative cholangitis during biliary drainage increases the incidence of postoperative severe complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 208(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH et al (2010) Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 362(2):129–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao XQ, Dong JH, Jiang K, Huang XQ, Zhang WZ (2015) Comparison of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and endoscopic biliary drainage in the management of malignant biliary tract obstruction: a meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 27(1):137–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prawdzik C, Belyaev O, Chromik AM, Uhl W, Herzog T. (2014) Surgical revision of hepaticojejunostomy strictures after pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg

  11. Bektas H, Winny M, Schrem H, Becker T, Klempnauer J (2007) Late stage stenoses of bile ducts after iatrogenic bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy. Zentralbl Chir 132(6):523–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lipsett PA, Pitt HA (1990) Acute cholangitis. Surg Clin North Am 70(6):1297–1312

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee DW, Chung SC (1997) Biliary infection. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 11(4):707–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Doganay M, Yuksek YN, Daglar G, Gozalan U, Tutuncu T, Kama NA (2010) Clinical determinants of suppurative cholangitis in malignant biliary tract obstruction. Bratisl Lek Listy 111(6):336–339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wacha H (2010) Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. evidence based guidelines by an expert panel of the paul ehrlich gesellschaft | perioperative antibiotika-prophylaxe. empfehlungen einer expertenkommission der paul-ehrlich-gesellschaft für chemotherapie e.V. Chemother J 19(3):70–84

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kokot F, Sledzinski Z (1974) The gamma-glutamyltransferase (author’s transl). Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem 12(8):374–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Larraz-Mora E, Mayol J, Martinez-Sarmiento J, Alvarez-Bartolom M, Larroque-Derlon M, Fernandez-Represa JA (1999) Open biliary tract surgery: Multivariate analysis of factors affecting mortality. Dig Surg 16(3):204–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neumaier M, Metak G, Scherer MA (2006) C-reactive protein as a parameter of surgical trauma: CRP response after different types of surgery in 349 hip fractures. Acta Orthop 77(5):788–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. MacKay GJ, Molloy RG, O'Dwyer PJ (2011) C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative infective complications following elective colorectal resection. Colorectal Dis 13(5):583–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park JW, Lee JK, Lee KT, Lee KH, Sung YK, Kang CI (2014) How to interpret the bile culture results of patients with biliary tract infections. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 38(3):300–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kießlich R, Holfelder M, Will D et al (2001) Interventional ERCP in patients with cholestasis. degree of biliary bacterial colonization and antibiotic resistance. Z Gastroenterol 39(12):985–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Negm AA, Schott A, Vonberg RP et al (2010) Routine bile collection for microbiological analysis during cholangiography and its impact on the management of cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc 72(2):284–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cortes A, Sauvanet A, Bert F et al (2006) Effect of bile contamination on immediate outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumor. J Am Coll Surg 202(1):93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McArdle CS (1994) Oral prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery. J Antimicrob Chemother 33(2):200–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McArdle CS, Morran CG, Pettit L, Gemmell CG, Sleigh JD, Tillotson GS (1991) The value of oral antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery. J Hosp Infect 19(Suppl C):59–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kujath P (1989) Antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery. ciprofloxacin versus ceftriaxone. Am J Med 87(5A):255S–257S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Mufti M, Rakas FS, Glessa A et al (1989) Ceftriaxone versus clavulanate-potentiated amoxycillin for prophylaxis against post-operative sepsis in biliary surgery: a prospective randomized study in 200 patients. Curr Med Res Opin 11(6):354–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Augenstein VA, Reuter NP, Bower MR, McMasters KM, Scoggins CR, Martin RC (2010) Bile cultures: a guide to infectious complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol 102(5):478–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sourrouille I, Gaujoux S, Lacave G et al (2013) Five days of postoperative antimicrobial therapy decreases infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients at risk for bile contamination. HPB (Oxford) 15(6):473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohammed S, Evans C, VanBuren G et al (2014) Treatment of bacteriobilia decreases wound infection rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 16(6):592–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Limongelli P, Pai M, Bansi D et al (2007) Correlation between preoperative biliary drainage, bile duct contamination, and postoperative outcomes for pancreatic surgery. Surgery 142(3):313–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grizas S, Stakyte M, Kincius M, Barauskas G, Pundzius J (2005) Etiology of bile infection and its association with postoperative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. Med (Kaunas) 41(5):386–391

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jagannath P, Dhir V, Shrikhande S, Shah RC, Mullerpatan P, Mohandas KM (2005) Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92(3):356–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schulze T, Heidecke CD (2015) Treatment of postoperative impairment of gastrointestinal motility, cholangitis and pancreatitis. Chirurg 86(6):540–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jethwa P, Breuning E, Bhati C, Buckles J, Mirza D, Bramhall S (2007) The microbiological impact of pre-operative biliary drainage on patients undergoing hepato-biliary-pancreatic (HPB) surgery. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25(10):1175–1180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chuang JH, Lee SY, Chen WJ, Hsieh CS, Chang NK, Lo SK (2001) Changes in bacterial concentration in the liver correlate with that in the hepaticojejunostomy after bile duct reconstruction: implication in the pathogenesis of postoperative cholangitis. World J Surg 25(12):1512–1518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang X, Liang B, Zhao XQ, Zhang FB, Wang XT, Dong JH (2015) The effects of different preoperative biliary drainage methods on complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(14), e723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin T, Qu K, Xu X et al (2014) Sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients: an important and easily ignored problem based on a german experience. Front Med 8(1):118–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mortimer PR, Mackie DB, Haynes S (1969) Ampicillin levels in human bile in the presence of biliary tract disease. Br Med J 3(5662):88–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Swoboda S, Oberdorfer K, Klee F, Hoppe-Tichy T, von Baum H, Geiss HK (2003) Tissue and serum concentrations of levofloxacin 500 mg administered intravenously or orally for antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary surgery. J Antimicrob Chemother 51(2):459–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wiedemann B, Hesig P (1999) Bacterial resistance to quinolones (ciprofloxacin). Chemother J 8(3):99–107

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

SC: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. KT: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. RV: drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. FV: analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript. HS: analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of manuscript. SS: drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. JK: study conception and design, acquisition of data, critical revision of manuscript. HB: study conception and design, acquisition of data, critical revision of manuscript. MK: study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, Critical revision of manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Cammann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Additional information

Sebastian Cammann and Kai Timrott contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cammann, S., Timrott, K., Vonberg, RP. et al. Cholangitis in the postoperative course after biliodigestive anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401, 715–724 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1450-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1450-z

Keywords

Navigation