Abstract
Background
Incomplete tumor resection with insufficient lymphadenectomy following a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for lower biliary tract cancer results in a dismal outcome. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of PD between total meso-pancreatoduodenum excision (tMPDe) and the conventional procedure for lower biliary tract cancer.
Methods
Patients who underwent PD for lower biliary tract cancer between May 2003 and March 2015 were included in this study. We have devised a new surgical technique, tMPDe, as a mesenteric plane surgery with an artery-first approach, for achieving complete clearance of the peripancreatic retroperitoneal tissue and lymph nodes. Perioperative data, including complications and short-term survival, were evaluated.
Results
A total of 74 consecutive patients underwent a PD: 41 patients underwent conventional PD (cPD), and 33 underwent tMPDe. The tumor stages were similar in the two study groups. R0 was achieved in 32 patients (78.0 %) with cPD and in 31 patients (93.9 %) with tMPDe (p = 0.046). The survival rates at 1 and 3 years after surgery were 82.5 and 64.0 % for the cPD group, with a median follow-up period of 44.6 months, and 92.8 and 84.4 % for the tMPDe group, with a median follow-up period of 28.6 months, respectively.
Conclusions
The tMPDe technique significantly increased R0 resection and contributed to better oncological outcomes in lower biliary tract cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Michelassi F, Erroi F, Dawson PJ et al (1989) Experience with 647 consecutive tumors of the duodenum, ampulla, head of the pancreas, and distal common bile duct. Ann Surg 210:544–554
Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, Cameron JL et al (1998) Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg 227:821–831
Michalski CW, Weitz J, Büchler MW (2007) Surgery insight: surgical management of pancreatic cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4:526–535
Esposite I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F et al (2008) Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1651–1660
Gockel I, Domeyer M, Wolloscheck T et al (2007) Resection of the mesopancreas (RMP): a new surgical classification of a known anatomical space. World J Surg Oncol 5:44
Gaedcke J, Gunawan B, Grade M et al (2010) The mesopancreas is the primary site for R1 resection in pancreatic head cancer: relevance for clinical trials. Langenbacks Arch Surg 395:451–458
Jamieson NB, Foulis AK, Oien KA et al (2010) Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 251:1003–1010
Menon KV, Gomez D, Smith AM et al (2009) Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathological Protocol (LEEPP). HBP 11:18–24
Noto M, Miwa K, Kitagawa H et al (2005) Pancreas head carcinoma: frequency of invasion to soft tissue adherent to the superior mesenteric artery. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1056–1061
Kayahara M, Nagakawa, Ueno K et al (1995) Surgical strategy for carcinoma of the pancreas head area based on clinicopathologic analysis of nodal involvement and plexus invasion. Surgery 117:616–623
Popescu I, Dumitrascu T (2011) Total meso-pancreas excision: key point of resection in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 58:202–207
Kawabata Y, Tanaka T, Nishi T et al (2012) Appraisal of a total meso-pancreatoduodenum excision with pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:574–579
Horiguchi A, Ishihara S, Ito M et al (2002) Three-dimensional models of arteries constructed using multidetector-row CT images to perform pancreatoduodenectomy safely following dissection of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:523–526
Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery. Classification of biliary tract carcinoma (2004) 2nd English edition. Tokyo, Kanehara
Sobin LH, Wittekind C (Eds) (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th ed. UICC International Union Against Cancer. New York, Wiley-Liss
Nimura Y, Nagino M, Takao S et al (2012) Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 19:230–241
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13
Agrawal MK, Thakur DS, Somashekar U et al (2010) Mesopancreas: myth or reality? JOP 11:230–233
Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1:1479–1482
Pessaux P, Varma D, Arnaud JP (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: superior mesenteric artery first approach. J Gastrointest Surg 10:607–611
Weitz J, Rahabari N, Koch M et al (2010) The “artery first” approach for resection of pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll 210:e1–e4
Inoue Y, Saiura A, Yoshioka R et al (2015) Pancreatoduodenectomy with systematic mesopancreas dissection using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. Ann Surg 262:1092–101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Research involving human participants and/or animals informed consent
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Shimane University Hospital. At the time of the start point of this study, the purpose of the present study was explained to each patient and their families and an informed consent was obtained with document. Furthermore, adequate care was taken to protect the privacy of the individuals participating in the study. Each patient was informed of the present study’s intent to not use the clinical data from this study for any purpose other than for present study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kawabata, Y., Hayashi, H., Ishikawa, N. et al. Total meso-pancreatoduodenum excision with pancreaticoduodenectomy in lower biliary tract cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401, 463–469 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1435-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1435-y