Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Necessary circumferential resection margins to prevent rectal cancer relapse after abdomino-peranal (intersphincteric) resection

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the adequate circumferential resection margin (CRM) for abdomino-peranal (intersphincteric) resection (ISR) that would prevent the relapse of rectal cancers.

Methods

The records of 41 cases that underwent curative ISR for rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. The relapse-free survival rates and overall survival rates were evaluated and correlated with the maximum depth of the inner muscularis layer reached during ISR (i.e., the radial margin [RM] and distal margin [DM]). Cases were divided into three groups based on the sizes of the RM and DM: (1) group A (RM >2 mm and DM >1.5 cm), (2) group B (RM >2 mm or DM >1.5 cm but not both), and (3) group C (RM <2 mm and DM <1.5 cm).

Results

The relapse-free survival rates of the cases in group C were lower than those in the cases of group A or group B (p = 0.002 and 0.037, respectively). The resection margins required to prevent rectal cancer relapse were >2 mm for the RM and >1.5 cm for the DM. For these margins, the intersphincteric space had to be entered (i.e., between the internal and external anal sphincters).

Conclusion

It is critical to enter the intersphincteric space to ensure an adequate CRM (RM >2 mm and DM >1.5 cm) for preventing rectal cancer recurrence after ISR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koyama M, Murata A, Sakamoto Y, Morohashi H, Takahashi S, Yoshida E, Hakamada K (2014) Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(Suppl 3):S422–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, Yamaguchi T, Fujita S, Moriya Y (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 14:104–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, Ishiguro S, Yamaguchi T, Fujita S, Moriya Y, Nakanishi Y (2008) Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2668–2676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Moriya Y (2007) Incidence and patterns of recurrence after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 205:642–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saito N, Moriya Y, Shirouzu K, Maeda K, Mochizuki H, Koda K, Hirai T, Sugito M, Ito M, Kobayashi A (2006) Intersphincteric resection in cases with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Dis Colon Rectum 49:S13–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Ishikawa K, Fujimoto H, Shinto E, Hase K (2004) Preoperative parameters expanding the indication of sphincter preserving surgery in cases with advanced low rectal cancer. Ann Surg 239:34–42

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M, Ito M, Morihiro M, Kosugi C, Sato K, Kotaka M, Nomura S, Arai M, Kobatake T (2004) Early results of intersphincteric resection for cases with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shirouzu K, Ogata Y, Araki Y, Kishimoto Y, Sato Y (2003) A new ultimate anus-preserving operation for extremely low rectal cancer and for anal canal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 7:203–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T, Tsukamoto S, Tomioka H, Kagawa H (2013) Feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for cases with cT1-T2 low rectal cancer. Dig Surg 30:272–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, Fujita S (1995) Nerve-sparing surgery with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 31A:1229–1232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bosman FT CF, Hruban RH, Theise ND (2010) WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. 4th ed

  12. Shuppan K (2006) Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. 7th ed, revised version Tokyo, Japan

  13. Kuebler JP, Wieand HS, O’Connell MJ, Smith RE, Colangelo LH, Yothers G, Petrelli NJ, Findlay MP, Seay TE, Atkins JN, Zapas JL, Goodwin JW, Fehrenbacher L, Ramanathan RK, Conley BA, Flynn PJ, Soori G, Colman LK, Levine EA, Lanier KS, Wolmark N (2007) Oxaliplatin combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer: results from NSABP C-07. J Clin Oncol 25:2198–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. André T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L, Navarro M, Tabernero J, Hickish T, Topham C, Zaninelli M, Clingan P, Bridgewater J, Tabah-Fisch I, de Gramont A; Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer (MOSAIC) Investigators (2004) Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2343–2351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Monga DK, O’Connell MJ (2006) Surgical adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer: current approaches and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1021–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernstein TE, Endreseth BH, Romundstad P, Wibe A, Norwegian Colorectal Cancer G (2009) Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:1348–1357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Inada R, Takawa M, Moriya Y (2011) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach. Dig Surg 28:404–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, Rullier A, Vendrely V, Zerbib F (2005) Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 2241:465–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Kojima M, Nishizawa Y, Sugito M (2014) Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21:3608–3615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chih-Chien Chin C-YY, Huang W-S, Wang J-Y (2006) Clinical outcome of intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 28:640–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Komori K, Kanemitsu Y, Kimura K, Sano T, Ito S, Abe T, Senda Y, Shimizu Y (2013) Detailed stratification of TNM stage III rectal cancer based on the presence/absence of extracapsular invasion of the metastatic lymph nodes. Dis Colon Rectum 56:726–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Komori K, Kanemitsu Y, Ishiguro S, Shimizu Y, Sano T, Ito S, Abe T, Senda Y, Misawa K, Ito Y, Uemura N, Kato T (2011) Clinicopathological study of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas: comparison between solid-type and non-solid-type adenocarcinomas. Anticancer Res 31:3463–3467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Komori.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komori, K., Kimura, K., Kinoshita, T. et al. Necessary circumferential resection margins to prevent rectal cancer relapse after abdomino-peranal (intersphincteric) resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401, 189–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1383-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1383-6

Keywords

Navigation