Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abdominal drainage after liver transplantation from deceased donors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Traditionally, abdominal drainage (AD) is routinely inserted in patients after liver transplantation (LT) to drain ascites and to detect postoperative hemorrhage and bile leakage. However, the benefit of this surgical practice remains a matter of debate regarding potential drainage-associated morbidities.

Methods

In a retrospective pair-matched analysis in a 1:1 ratio, 116 patients after LT were assessed with regards to benefits and risks of abdominal drainage under immunosuppression, respecting model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), age, and gender.

Results

The indications for LT were comparable between the drain and the no-drain group. There was an increased rate of early bile leakage in patients with abdominal drainage (13.8 vs. 1.7 %, p = 0.032). In addition, a significantly higher incidence of infections requiring antibiotic therapy was observed in the drain group (63.8 vs. 39.7 %, p = 0.015). The contribution of drains as a diagnostic tool was marginal, as in the drain group, other diagnostic tools than the drain itself confirmed 50 % of all early bile leakages and 60 % of postoperative hemorrhages. Overall, there was no difference regarding the incidence of incisional hernia after LT (8.6 vs. 10.3 %, p = 1.000), length of hospital stay (22.9 ± 18.7 vs. 18.6 ± 18.6 days, p = 0.215), and 1- and 5-year patient (p = 0.981) and graft survival (p = 0.092).

Conclusions

Equal results can be achieved with or without an abdominal drain in recipients with whole-liver grafts in spite of an increased risk of postoperative infection and biliary leakage in the former group. A benefit of AD as a diagnostic tool could not be demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fernandez-Aguilar JL, Suarez Munoz MA, Santoyo Santoyo J et al (2010) Is liver transplantation without abdominal drainage safe? Transplant Proc 42:647–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kluger MD, Memeo R, Laurent A et al (2011) Survey of adult liver transplantation techniques (SALT): an international study of current practices in deceased donor liver transplantation. HPB (Oxford) 13:692–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pianon P, Lise M (1992) Exteriorization of an ovary: an unusual complication of abdominal drainage. Br J Surg 79:963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poon CM, Leong HT (2009) Abdominal drain causing early small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colectomy. JSLS 13:625–627

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H et al (2006) Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 244:1–7

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tokunaga Y, Nakayama N, Nishitai R et al (1998) Effects of closed-system drain in surgery: focus on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Dig Surg 15:352–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Moriguchi M et al (2012) Criteria for drain removal following liver resection. Br J Surg 99:1584–1590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Rougemont O, Dutkowski P, Weber M, Clavien PA (2009) Abdominal drains in liver transplantation: useful tool or useless dogma? A matched case–control study. Liver Transpl 15:96–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gurusamy KS, Naik P, Davidson BR. Routine drainage for orthotopic liver transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD008399.

  11. Baldini E, Gugenheim J, Ouzan D et al (1999) Orthotopic liver transplantation with and without peritoneal drainage: a comparative study. Transplant Proc 31:556–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandez-Aguilar JL, Suarez-Munoz MA, Sanchez-Perez B et al (2012) Liver transplantation without abdominal drainage. Transplant Proc 44:2542–2544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Watt KD, Pedersen RA, Kremers WK et al (2010) Evolution of causes and risk factors for mortality post-liver transplant: results of the NIDDK long-term follow-up study. Am J Transplant 10:1420–1427

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fishman JA (2007) Infection in solid-organ transplant recipients. N Engl J Med 357:2601–2614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239:194–201

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Belghiti J, Kabbej M, Sauvanet A et al (1993) Drainage after elective hepatic resection. A randomized trial. Ann Surg 218:748–753

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K et al (1996) Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 171:158–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nosaka T, Bowers JL, Cay O, Clouse ME (1999) Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation in rats. Surg Today 29:963–965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka K, Kumamoto T, Nojiri K et al (2012) The effectiveness and appropriate management of abdominal drains in patients undergoing elective liver resection: a retrospective analysis and prospective case series. Surg Today

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Authors’ contributions

CS: study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, writing paper. TS: study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data, writing paper, critical revision of manuscript. GG: acquisition of data, critical revision of manuscript. GS: acquisition of data, critical revision of manuscript. SFS: acquisition of data. FM: acquisition of data. GAB: study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data, writing paper, critical revision of manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Soliman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwarz, C., Soliman, T., Györi, G. et al. Abdominal drainage after liver transplantation from deceased donors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400, 813–819 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1338-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1338-3

Keywords

Navigation