Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical significance of mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) is a useful surgical procedure in esophageal cancer patients who have limited indications for transthoracic operations due to preoperative complications.

Methods

In the last 10 years, 63 patients underwent MATHE at our department. We examined the clinical data of these patients and assessed the indications, postoperative outcomes, and prognostic factors of MATHE.

Results

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 53.4 %, and disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 66.0 %. Postoperative complications were observed in 22 cases (34.9 %), and recurrent disease occurred in 17 cases (27.0 %). On univariate analyses of OS, location of the tumor, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, clinical stage, simultaneous resection of other organs, postoperative pneumonia, and blood loss were significant prognostic factors. On multivariate analyses, location of the tumor and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors of OS. On univariate analyses, location of the tumor, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, clinical stage, and blood loss were significant prognostic factors of DFS, while on multivariate analyses of DFS, lymph node metastasis and blood loss were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

MATHE is a useful procedure for the middle to lower thoracic esophageal cancer patients without clinical lymph node metastasis with serious complications who were unable to undergo thoracotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Natsugoe S, Matsumoto M, Okumura H, Uchikado Y, Setoyama T, Sasaki K, Sakurai T, Omoto I, Owaki T, Shinchi H, Ueno S, Ishigami S (2010) Clinical course and outcome after esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 395(4):341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90(1):108–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shichinohe T, Hirano S, Kondo S (2008) Video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today 38(3):206–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bumm R, Hölscher AH, Feussner H, Tachibana M, Bartels H, Siewert JR (1993) Endodissection of the thoracic esophagus. Technique and clinical results in transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Surg 218(1):97–104

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tangoku A, Yoshino S, Abe T, Hayashi H, Satou T, Ueno T, Oka M (2004) Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 18(3):383–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (eds) (2009) International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka F, Yamamoto K, Suzuki S, Inoue H, Tsurumaru M, Kajiyama Y, Kato H, Igaki H, Furuta K, Fujita H, Tanaka T, Tanaka Y, Kawashima Y, Natsugoe S, Setoyama T, Tokudome S, Mimori K, Haraguchi N, Ishii H, Mori M (2010) Strong interaction between the effects of alcohol consumption and smoking on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma among individuals with ADH1B and/or ALDH2 risk alleles. Gut 59(11):1457–1464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Manncke K, Raestrup H, Walter D, Buess G, Becker HD (1994) Technique of endoscopic mediastinal dissection of the oesophagus. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2(1):10–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feng MX, Wang H, Zhang Y, Tan LJ, Xu ZL, Qun W (2012) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case–control study of thoracoscope versus mediastinoscope assistance. Surg Endosc 26:1573–1578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Law S, Wong KH, Kwok KF, Chu KM, Wong J (2004) Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg 240(5):791–800

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Natsugoe S, Yoshinaka H, Shimada M, Sakamoto F, Morinaga T, Nakano S, Kusano C, Baba M, Takao S, Aikou T (2001) Number of lymph node metastases determined by presurgical ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound is related to prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 234(5):613–618

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakamoto F, Natsugoe S, Yoshinaka H, Shimada M, Owaki T, Nakano S, Baba M, Aikou T (2004) Endosonographic detection of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in superficial carcinoma of the esophagus: assessment by type classification and histogram. J Gastroenterol 39(1):7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bumm R, Feussner H, Bartels H, Stein H, Dittler HJ, Höfler H, Siewert JR (1997) Radical transhiatal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and endodissection for distal esophageal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 21(8):822–831

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ozawa S, Tachimori Y, Baba H, Matsubara H, Muro K, Numasaki H, Oyama T, Shinoda M, Takeuchi H, Tanaka O, Teshima T, Udagawa H, Uno T, Barron JP (2010) Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan, 2002. Esophagus 7(1):7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Authors’ contributions

Study conception and design: Hiroshi Okumura and Shoji Natsugoe; acquisition of data: Hiroshi Okumura, Yasuto Uchikado, Masataka Matsumoto, Itaru Omoto, Ken Sasaki, Yoshiaki Kita, Takaaki Arigami, Yoshikazu Uenosono, Akihiro Nakajo, Tetsuhiro Owaki, and Shoji Natsugoe; analysis and interpretation of data: Hiroshi Okumura, Yasuto Uchikado, Masataka Matsumoto, and Shoji Natsugoe; drafting of manuscript: Hiroshi Okumura; and critical revision of manuscript: Shinichiro Mori, Sumiya Ishigami, and Shoji Natsugoe

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Okumura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okumura, H., Uchikado, Y., Matsumoto, M. et al. Clinical significance of mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400, 699–706 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1330-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1330-y

Keywords

Navigation