Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of treatment outcomes between nonsurgical and surgical treatment of distal radius fracture in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The best treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly is uncertain. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of DRFs in persons 65 years of age or older.

Methods

Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until April 27, 2015 using the following search terms: distal radius fracture, conservative treatment, nonoperative treatment, nonsurgical treatment, surgical treatment, operative, elderly, and older. The primary outcome measure was DASH score, and secondary outcomes were functional and radiological assessments. The standard difference in post-treatment means was calculated for the outcomes to compare the two groups.

Results

Of 59 articles identified, eight studies with a total of 440 patients in the surgical groups and 449 in the control groups were included in the analysis. No significant differences in DASH score, VAS pain score, grip strength, wrist extension, pronation, or supination, and ulnar deviation were noted between the groups. The nonsurgical group had significantly greater wrist flexion, radial deviation, and ulnar variance and less radial inclination than the surgical group.

Conclusions

Surgical and nonsurgical methods produce similar results in the treatment of DRFS in the elderly, and minor objective functional differences did not result an impact on subjective function outcome and quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC (2012) The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin 28:113–125

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lutz K, Yeoh KM, MacDermid JC, Symonette C, Grewal R (2014) Complications associated with operative versus nonsurgical treatment of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older. J Hand Surg Am 39:1280–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arora R, Gabl M, Gschwentner M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Lutz M (2009) A comparative study of clinical and radiologic outcomes of unstable colles type distal radius fractures in patients older than 70 years: nonoperative treatment versus volar locking plating. J Orthop Trauma 23:237–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arora R, Lutz M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Haug L, Gabl M (2011) A prospective randomized trial comparing nonoperative treatment with volar locking plate fixation for displaced and unstable distal radial fractures in patients sixty-five years of age and older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2146–2153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan YH, Foo TL, Yeo CJ, Chew WY (2014) Comparison between cast immobilization versus volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures in active elderly patients, the Asian perspective. Hand Surg 19:19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Egol KA, Walsh M, Romo-Cardoso S, Dorsky S, Paksima N (2010) Distal radial fractures in the elderly: operative compared with nonoperative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1851–1857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aktekin CN, Altay M, Gursoy Z, Aktekin LA, Ozturk AM, Tabak AY (2010) Comparison between external fixation and cast treatment in the management of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and older. J Hand Surg Am 35:736–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wong TC, Chiu Y, Tsang WL, Leung WY, Yam SK, Yeung SH (2010) Casting versus percutaneous pinning for extra-articular fractures of the distal radius in an elderly Chinese population: a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 35:202–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Handoll HH, Madhok R (2003) Surgical interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Handoll HH, Madhok R (2003) Conservative interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD000314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei J, Yang TB, Luo W, Qin JB, Kong FJ (2013) Complications following dorsal versus volar plate fixation of distal radius fracture: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 41:265–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151:W65–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, Carpenter J, Rücker G, Harbord RM, Schmid CH, Tetzlaff J, Deeks JJ, Peters J, Macaskill P, Schwarzer G, Duval S, Altman DG, Moher D, Higgins JP (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4002. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bartl C, Stengel D, Bruckner T, Gebhard F; ORCHID Study Group (2014) The treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures in elderly patients. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111:779–787

    Google Scholar 

  15. Handoll HH, Huntley JS, Madhok R (2007) External fixation versus conservative treatment for distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD006194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Handoll HH, Vaghela MV, Madhok R (2007) Percutaneous pinning for treating distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD006080

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cui Z, Pan J, Yu B, Zhang K, Xiong X (2011) Internal versus external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: an up-to-date meta-analysis. Int Orthop 35:1333–1341

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei DH, Poolman RW, Bhandari M, Wolfe VM, Rosenwasser MP (2012) External fixation versus internal fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative clinical trials. J Orthop Trauma 26:386–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Xie X, Xie X, Qin H, Shen L, Zhang C (2013) Comparison of internal and external fixation of distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop 84:286–291

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu GG, Chan SP, Puhaindran ME, Chew WY (2009) Prospective randomised study of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: comparison between external fixation and plate fixation. Ann Acad Med Singapore 38:600–606

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diaz-Garcia RJ, Oda T, Shauver MJ, Chung KC (2011) A systematic review of outcomes and complications of treating unstable distal radius fractures in the elderly. J Hand Surg Am 36:824–835.e2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moroni A, Vannini F, Faldini C, Pegreffi F, Giannini S (2004) Cast vs external fixation: a comparative study in elderly osteoporotic distal radial fracture patients. Scand J Surg 93:64–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peng B, Wang J, Mao F (2013) Comparison of efficacy between the surgical treatment and plaster external fixation for treatment of unstable distal radius fractures. Zhongguo Gu Shang 26:41–46 [Article in Chinese]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ur Rahman O, Khan MQ, Rasheed H, Ahmad S (2012) Treatment of unstable intraarticular fracture of distal radius: POP casting with external fixation. J Pak Med Assoc 62:358–362

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zyluk A, Janowski P (2007) A comparison of the results of the conservative vs operative by percutaneous Kirschner-wiring treatment of fractures of the distal radius. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 72:327–334 [Article in Polish]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grabicki M, Grzegorzewski A (2010) Evaluation of distal radius fracture treatment—non-operative vs. operative with percutaneous pinning. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 75:205–210 [Article in Polish]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gay AM, Béréni N, Legré R (2013) Type I complex regional pain syndrome. Chir Main 32:269–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roh YH, Lee BK, Noh JH, Baek JR, Oh JH, Gong HS, Baek GH (2014) Factors associated with complex regional pain syndrome type I in patients with surgically treated distal radius fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1775–1781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jellad A, Salah S, Ben Salah Frih Z (2014) Complex regional pain syndrome type I: incidence and risk factors in patients with fracture of the distal radius. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95:487–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Malay S, Chung KC (2014) Testing the validity of preventing complex regional pain syndrome with vitamin C after distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am 39:2251–2257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meena S, Sharma P, Gangary SK, Chowdhury B (2015) Role of vitamin C in prevention of complex regional pain syndrome after distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:637–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ekrol I, Duckworth AD, Ralston SH, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (2014) The influence of vitamin C on the outcome of distal radial fractures: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1451–1459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author contribution

Jihui Ju: study design, literature research, clinical studies, data acquisition, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation

Guangzhe Jin: literature research, clinical studies, data acquisition

Guanxing Li: literature research, clinical studies, data acquisition

Haiyang Hu: literature research, clinical studies, data acquisition

Ruixing Hou: guarantor of integrity of the entire study, study design, manuscript review

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hand Surgery, Ruihua Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 5st Ta Yun Street, Suzhou, 215104, China

    Ji-Hui Ju, Guang-Zhe Jin, Guan-Xing Li, Hai-Yang Hu & Rui-Xing Hou

Authors
  1. Ji-Hui Ju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guang-Zhe Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guan-Xing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hai-Yang Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rui-Xing Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui-Xing Hou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ju, JH., Jin, GZ., Li, GX. et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes between nonsurgical and surgical treatment of distal radius fracture in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400, 767–779 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1324-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1324-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation