Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Additional surgical procedure is a risk factor for surgical site infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Surgical site infections (SSI) are associated with increased costs and length of hospital stay, readmission rates, and mortality. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for SSI in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

Analysis of 35,432 laparoscopic cholecystectomies of a prospective multicenter database was performed. Risk factors for SSI were identified among demographic data, preoperative patients’ history, and operative data using multivariate analysis.

Results

SSIs after laparoscopic cholecystectomy were seen in 0.8 % (n = 291) of the patients. Multivariate analysis identified the following parameters as risk factors for SSI: additional surgical procedure (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.2–7.5), age over 55 years (OR 2.4 [1.8–3.2]), conversion to open procedure (OR 2.6 [1.9–3.6]), postoperative hematoma (OR 1.9 [1.2–3.1]), duration of operation >60 min (OR 2.5 [1.7–3.6], cystic stump insufficiency (OR 12.5 [4.2–37.2]), gallbladder perforation (OR 6.2 [2.4–16.1]), gallbladder empyema (OR 1.7 [1.1–2.7]), and surgical revision (OR 15.7 [10.4–23.7]. SSIs were associated with a significantly prolonged hospital stay (p < 0.001), higher postoperative mortality (p < 0.001), and increased rate of surgical revision (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Additional surgical procedure was identified as a strong risk factor for SSI after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Furthermore, operation time >60 min, age >55 years, conversion to open procedure, cystic stump insufficiency, postoperative hematoma, gallbladder perforation, gallbladder empyema, or surgical revision were identified as specific risk factors for SSI after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galway UA, Parker BM, Borkowski RG (2009) Prevention of postoperative surgical site infections. Int Anesthesiol Clin 47:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G et al (2009) Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 10:539–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Howard DP, Datta G, Cunnick G et al (2010) Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 12:423–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Romy S, Eisenring MC, Bettschart V et al (2008) Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg 247:627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2010) Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg Endosc 24:270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurmann A, Vorburger SA, Candinas D et al (2011) Operation time and body mass index are significant risk factors for surgical site infection in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 25:3531–3534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D et al (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 237:358–362

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang WT, Lee KT, Chuang SC et al (2006) The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complication in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 191:721–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma N, Garg PK, Hadke NS et al (2010) Role of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and risk factors for surgical site infection: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Infect 11:367–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Worni M, Guller U, Shah A et al (2012) Cholecystectomy concomitant with laparoscopic gastric bypass: a trend analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample from 2001 to 2008. Obesity surgery 22:220–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (2004) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 32(8):470–85

  12. Brummer S, Sohr D, Ruden H et al (2007) Surgical site infection rates using a laparoscopic approach: results of the German national nosocomial infections surveillance system. Chirurg 78:910–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fahrner R, Turina M, Neuhaus V, Schöb O (2012) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a teaching operation: comparison of outcome between residents and attending surgeons in 1,747 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(1):103–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shea JA, Berlin JA, Bachwich DR et al (1998) Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and postlaparoscopic eras. Ann Surg 227:343–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yildiz B, Abbasoglu O, Tirnaksiz B et al (2009) Determinants of postoperative infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 56:589–592

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haridas M, Malangoni MA (2008) Predictive factors for surgical site infection in general surgery. Surgery 144:496–501, discussion 501-493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leong G, Wilson J, Charlett A (2006) Duration of operation as a risk factor for surgical site infection: comparison of English and US data. J Hosp Infect 63:255–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Malone DL, Genuit T, Tracy JK et al (2002) Surgical site infections: reanalysis of risk factors. J Surg Res 103:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chuang SC, Lee KT, Chang WT et al (2004) Risk factors for wound infection after cholecystectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 103:607–612

    Google Scholar 

  20. Garibaldi RA, Skolnick D, Maglio S et al (1986) Postcholecystectomy wound infection. The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on the epidemiology of infections. Ann Surg 204:650–654

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Meijer WS, Schmitz PI (1993) Prophylactic use of cefuroxime in biliary tract surgery: randomized controlled trial of single versus multiple dose in high-risk patients. Galant Trial Study Group. Br J Surg 80:917–921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Biscione FM, Couto RC, Pedrosa TM et al (2007) Comparison of the risk of surgical site infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 28:1103–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Authors’ contributions:

Study conception and design

R. Fahrner, T. Malinka, J. Klasen, D. Candinas, G. Beldi

Acquisition of data

R. Fahrner, T. Malinka, J. Klasen

Analysis and interpretation of data

R. Fahrner, T. Malinka, J. Klasen, D. Candinas, G. Beldi

Drafting of manuscript

R. Fahrner

Critical revision of manuscript

T. Malinka, J. Klasen, D. Candinas, G. Beldi

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Beldi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fahrner, R., Malinka, T., Klasen, J. et al. Additional surgical procedure is a risk factor for surgical site infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399, 595–599 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1197-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1197-3

Keywords

Navigation