Abstract
Aims
Postoperative morbidity and mortality after liver resection is closely related to the degree of intraoperative blood loss; the majority of which occurs during transection of the liver parenchyma. Many approaches and devices have therefore been developed to limit bleeding, but none has yet achieved perfect results up to now. The aim of this standardized chronic animal study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the LigaSure™ Vessel Sealing System (LVSS) with the stapler technique, which is one of the modern techniques for transecting the parenchyma in liver surgery.
Methods
Sixteen pigs underwent a left liver resection (LLR). Eight pigs received a LLR by means of an Endo GIA, whereas the other eight pigs underwent liver parenchymal transection followed by simultaneous sealing by the LVSS. The operating time, transection time, blood loss during transection, and time of hemostasis were measured on the day of LLR (postoperative day 0/POD 0). Animals were re-explored on postoperative day 7 (POD 7) and the transection surface of remnant liver was observed for fluid collection (hematoma, biloma, and abscess), necrosis, and other pathologies. A biopsy was taken from the area of transection for histopathological examination.
Results
All animals survived until POD 7. Operating time and transection time of the liver parenchyma on POD 0 was significantly shorter in the stapler group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood loss during transection, time of hemostasis and number of sutures for hemostasis on POD 0, morbidity rate, as well as the histopathological examination on POD 7. Furthermore, the material costs were significantly higher in the stapler group than in the LVSS group.
Conclusion
In this standardized chronic animal study concerning transection of the parenchyma in liver surgery, LVSS seems not only to be safe, but also comparable with the stapler technique in terms of morbidity and mortality. Additionally, LVSS significantly reduces material costs. However, the transection time is significantly longer for LVSS than for the stapler resection technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rees M et al (1996) One hundred and fifty hepatic resections: evolution of technique towards bloodless surgery. Br J Surg 83(11):1526–1529
Doci R et al (1995) Morbidity and mortality after hepatic resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 82(3):377–381
Belghiti J et al (2000) Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 191(1):38–46
Gozzetti G et al (1995) Liver resection without blood transfusion. Br J Surg 82(8):1105–1110
Cunningham JD et al (1994) One hundred consecutive hepatic resections. Blood loss, transfusion, and operative technique. Arch Surg 129(10):1050–1056
Jarnagin WR et al (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236(4):397–406, discussion 406–7
Neeff H et al (2009) Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma—results and analysis of the current literature. Zentralbl Chir 134(2):127–135
Fan ST et al (1996) Hepatectomy with an ultrasonic dissector for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 83(1):117–120
Poon RT (2007) Current techniques of liver transection. HPB (Oxford) 9(3):166–173
Romano F et al (2007) Hepatic resection using a bipolar vessel sealing device: technical and histological analysis. HPB (Oxford) 9(5):339–344
Kossi J et al (2007) Laparoscopic sigmoid and rectal resection using an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17(6):719–722
Saiura A et al (2008) Liver transection using the LigaSure sealing system. HPB (Oxford) 10(4):239–243
Carbonell AM et al (2003) A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(6):377–380
Heniford BT et al (2001) Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surg Endosc 15(8):799–801
Gehrig T et al (2011) Comparison of different surgical techniques in distal pancreatectomy: an experimental study in a porcine model. Surg Innov 18(4):329–337
Gehrig T et al (2011) LigaSure versus conventional dissection technique in pancreatoduodenectomy: a pilot study. Am J Surg 201(2):166–170
Horgan PG (2001) A novel technique for parenchymal division during hepatectomy. Am J Surg 181(3):236–237
Leonardo C et al (2005) Laparoscopic nephrectomy using LigaSure system: preliminary experience. J Endourol 19(8):976–978
Mistrangelo E et al (2008) Safety and efficacy of vaginal hysterectomy in the large uterus with the LigaSure bipolar diathermy system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(5):475 e1–475 e5
Saidi RF et al (2007) Comparison between staple and vessel sealing device for parenchymal transection in laparoscopic liver surgery in a swine model. HPB 9:440–443
Schemmer P et al (2008) Liver transection using vascular stapler: a review. HPB 10:249–252
Schemmer P et al (2006) Stapler hepatectomy is a safe dissection technique: analysis of 300 patients. World J Surg 30(3):419–430
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no financial interests or other disclosures to declare. No external funds were used to perform the evaluation, and all of the technology tested was independently purchased to complete the study. In addition, the authors had full control of the design of the study, methods used, outcome measurements, analysis of data, and production of the written report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gehrig, T., Manzini, G., Fonouni, H. et al. Comparison of two different transection techniques in liver surgery—an experimental study in a porcine model. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398, 909–915 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1094-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1094-1