Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical intensive care unit – essential for good outcome in major abdominal surgery?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Surgical intensive care units (ICU) play a pivotal role in perioperative care of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Differences in quality of care provided by medical staff in ICUs may be linked to improved outcome. This review aims to elucidate the relationship between quality of care at various ICUs and patient outcome, with the ultimate aim of identifying key measures for achieving optimal outcome.

Methods

We reviewed the literature in PubMed to identify current ICU structural and process concepts and variations before evaluating their respective impact on quality of care and outcome in major abdominal surgery.

Results

ICU leadership, nurse and physician staffing, and provision of an intermediate care unit are important structural components that impact on patients’ outcome. A “mixed ICU” model, with intensivists primarily caring for the patients in close cooperation with the primary physician, seems to be the most effective ICU model. Surgeons’ involvement in intensive care is essential, and a close cooperation between surgeons and anesthesiologists is vital for good outcome. Current general process concepts include early mobilization, enteral feeding, and optimal perioperative fluid management. To decrease failure-to-rescue rates, procedure-specific intensive care processes are particularly focused on the early detection, assessment, and timely and consistent treatment of complications.

Conclusions

Several structures and processes in the ICU have an impact on outcome in major abdominal surgery. ICU structures and care processes connected with optimal outcome could be transmitted to other centers to improve outcome, independent of procedure volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA, Lipsett PA (2003) Surgical volume and quality of care for esophageal resection: do high-volume hospitals have fewer complications? Ann Thorac Surg 75:337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nathan H, Cameron JL, Choti MA, Schulick RD, Pawlik TM (2009) The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship. J Am Coll Surg 208:528–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA Jr, Lipsett PA (2003) Postoperative complication rates after hepatic resection in Maryland hospitals. Arch Surg 138:41–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, Dougherty J, Brennan MF (2002) The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 131:6–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA Jr, Lipsett PA, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr (2003) Variation in postoperative complication rates after high-risk surgery in the United States. Surgery 134:534–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sah BK, Zhu ZG, Chen MM, Xiang M, Chen J, Yan M, Lin YZ (2009) Effect of surgical work volume on postoperative complication: superiority of specialized center in gastric cancer treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:41–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weitz J, Koch M, Friess H, Buchler MW (2004) Impact of volume and specialization for cancer surgery. Dig Surg 21:253–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Goldfaden A, Birkmeyer NJ, Stukel TA (2006) Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery. Cancer 106:2476–2481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Robles NL, Gerwig WH Jr (1962) Surgical intensive care unit. W V Med J 58:363–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Donabedian A (1992) Quality assurance. Structure, process and outcome. Nurs Stand 7:4–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pronovost PJ, Jenckes MW, Dorman T, Garrett E, Breslow MJ, Rosenfeld BA, Lipsett PA, Bass E (1999) Organizational characteristics of intensive care units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic surgery. JAMA 281:1310–1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Heitmiller RF, Lipsett PA (2001) Intensive care unit physician staffing is associated with decreased length of stay, hospital cost, and complications after esophageal resection. Crit Care Med 29:753–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanson CW III, Deutschman CS, Anderson HL III, Reilly PM, Behringer EC, Schwab CW, Price J (1999) Effects of an organized critical care service on outcomes and resource utilization: a cohort study. Crit Care Med 27:270–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pronovost PJ, Angus DC, Dorman T, Robinson KA, Dremsizov TT, Young TL (2002) Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA 288:2151–2162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Cheung RB, Sloane DM, Silber JH (2003) Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. JAMA 290:1617–1623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimick JB, Swoboda SM, Pronovost PJ, Lipsett PA (2001) Effect of nurse-to-patient ratio in the intensive care unit on pulmonary complications and resource use after hepatectomy. Am J Crit Care 10:376–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pronovost PJ, Dang D, Dorman T, Lipsett PA, Garrett E, Jenckes M, Bass EB (2001) Intensive care unit nurse staffing and the risk for complications after abdominal aortic surgery. Eff Clin Pract 4:199–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Utzolino S, Kaffarnik M, Keck T, Berlet M, Hopt UT (2010) Unplanned discharges from a surgical intensive care unit: readmissions and mortality. J Crit Care 25:375–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan KS, Tan CK, Fang CS, Tsai CL, Hou CC, Cheng KC, Lee MC (2009) Readmission to the intensive care unit: an indicator that reflects the potential risks of morbidity and mortality of surgical patients in the intensive care unit. Surg Today 39:295–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaben A, Correa F, Reinhart K, Settmacher U, Gummert J, Kalff R, Sakr Y (2008) Readmission to a surgical intensive care unit: incidence, outcome and risk factors. Crit Care 12:R123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levy MF, Greene L, Ramsay MA, Jennings LW, Ramsay KJ, Meng J, Hein HA, Goldstein RM, Husberg BS, Gonwa TA, Klintmalm GB (2001) Readmission to the intensive care unit after liver transplantation. Crit Care Med 29:18–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beck DH, McQuillan P, Smith GB (2002) Waiting for the break of dawn? The effects of discharge time, discharge TISS scores and discharge facility on hospital mortality after intensive care. Intensive Care Med 28:1287–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Byrick RJ, Mazer CD, Caskennette GM (1993) Closure of an intermediate care unit. Impact on critical care utilization. Chest 104:876–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Franklin CM, Rackow EC, Mamdani B, Nightingale S, Burke G, Weil MH (1988) Decreases in mortality on a large urban medical service by facilitating access to critical care. An alternative to rationing. Arch Intern Med 148:1403–1405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fox AJ, Owen-Smith O, Spiers P (1999) The immediate impact of opening an adult high dependency unit on intensive care unit occupancy. Anaesthesia 54:280–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wallis CB, Davies HT, Shearer AJ (1997) Why do patients die on general wards after discharge from intensive care units? Anaesthesia 52:9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ridley SA (1998) Intermediate care, possibilities, requirements and solutions. Anaesthesia 53:654–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jones HJ, Coggins R, Lafuente J, de Cossart L (1999) Value of a surgical high-dependency unit. Br J Surg 86:1578–1582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Eachempati SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS (2004) The effect of an intermediate care unit on the demographics and outcomes of a surgical intensive care unit population. Arch Surg 139:315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertolini G, Confalonieri M, Rossi C, Rossi G, Simini B, Gorini M, Corrado A (2005) Costs of the COPD. Differences between intensive care unit and respiratory intermediate care unit. Respir Med 99:894–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Keenan SP, Massel D, Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ (1998) A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of noncardiac transitional care units. Chest 113:172–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Solberg BC, Dirksen CD, Nieman FH, van Merode G, Poeze M, Ramsay G (2008) Changes in hospital costs after introducing an intermediate care unit: a comparative observational study. Crit Care 12:R68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Johnson JL, Moore EE, Aasen AO, Rogy MA, Wang JE, Alsanea O, Aikawa N, Neira JA, Tisminetzky GJ (2006) The role of the surgeon as intensivist: an international perspective. Curr Opin Crit Care 12:357–369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Barrett H, Bion JF (2005) An international survey of training in adult intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 31:553–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Klar E, Puschel A, Schiffmann L, Pertschy A (2009) The role of intensive care medicine in early postoperative complications. Is surgical expertise in danger? Chirurg 80:773–779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Shapiro MJ (2006) Where have all the surgical intensivists gone? Crit Care Med 34:2485–2486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine (1999) Guidelines for intensive care unit admission, discharge, and triage. Crit Care Med 27:633–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Care I (2002) Anästh Intensivmed 43:536–541

    Google Scholar 

  39. Iscimen R, Brown DR, Cassivi SD, Keegan MT (2010) Intensive care unit utilization and outcome after esophagectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 24:440–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA, Lipsett PA (2003) Complications and costs after high-risk surgery: where should we focus quality improvement initiatives? J Am Coll Surg 196:671–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Welsch T, Degrate L, Zschäbitz S, Hofer S, Werner J, Schmidt J (2011) The need for extended intensive care after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg (in press)

  42. Bentrem DJ, Yeh JJ, Brennan MF, Kiran R, Pastores SM, Halpern NA, Jaques DP, Fong Y (2005) Predictors of intensive care unit admission and related outcome for patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 9:1307–1312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Povoski SP, Downey RJ, Dudrick PS, Fong Y, Jarnigan WR, Groeger JS, Blumgart LH (1999) The critically ill patient after hepatobiliary surgery. Crit Care 3:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hofer S, Plachky J, Fantl R, Schmidt J, Bardenheuer HJ, Weigand MA (2006) Postoperative pulmonary complications: prophylaxis after noncardiac surgery. Anaesthesist 55:473–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2009) Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in Medicare patients. Ann Surg 250:1029–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2009) Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med 361:1368–1375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S (2006) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst RevCD004080

  48. Allen C, Glasziou P, Del MC (1999) Bed rest: a potentially harmful treatment needing more careful evaluation. Lancet 354:1229–1233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Bass CS, Alexander JR, Bartolucci AA (2004) Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Chest 126:1187–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Brodner G, Pogatzki E, Van AH, Buerkle H, Goeters C, Schulzki C, Nottberg H, Mertes N (1998) A multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation in patients undergoing abdominothoracic esophagectomy. Anesth Analg 86:228–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Jiang K, Cheng L, Wang JJ, Li JS, Nie J (2009) Fast track clinical pathway implications in esophagogastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol 15:496–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. di Sebastiano P, Festa L, De Bonis A, Ciuffreda A, Valvano MR, Andriulli A, di Mola FF (2011) A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg (in press)

  55. Berberat PO, Ingold H, Gulbinas A, Kleeff J, Muller MW, Gutt C, Weigand M, Friess H, Buchler MW (2007) Fast track—different implications in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11:880–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, Di C V (2008) Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 95:1387–1393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM, Bemelmans MH, Lassen K, Revhaug A, Fearon KC, Garden OJ, Dejong CH (2008) Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 95:969–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. O'Connor ED, Walsham J (2009) Should we mobilise critically ill patients? A review. Crit Care Resusc 11:290–300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Muehling B, Schelzig H, Steffen P, Meierhenrich R, Sunder-Plassmann L, Orend KH (2009) A prospective randomized trial comparing traditional and fast-track patient care in elective open infrarenal aneurysm repair. World J Surg 33:577–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136:842–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Truong AD, Fan E, Brower RG, Needham DM (2009) Bench-to-bedside review: mobilizing patients in the intensive care unit—from pathophysiology to clinical trials. Crit Care 13:216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Needham DM (2008) Mobilizing patients in the intensive care unit: improving neuromuscular weakness and physical function. JAMA 300:1685–1690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Needham DM, Truong AD, Fan E (2009) Technology to enhance physical rehabilitation of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 37:S436–S441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Pohlman MC, Schweickert WD, Pohlman AS, Nigos C, Pawlik AJ, Esbrook CL, Spears L, Miller M, Franczyk M, Deprizio D, Schmidt GA, Bowman A, Barr R, McCallister K, Hall JB, Kress JP (2010) Feasibility of physical and occupational therapy beginning from initiation of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 38:2089–2094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Burtin C, Clerckx B, Robbeets C, Ferdinande P, Langer D, Troosters T, Hermans G, Decramer M, Gosselink R (2009) Early exercise in critically ill patients enhances short-term functional recovery. Crit Care Med 37:2499–2505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S (2009) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 13:569–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Richter B, Schmandra TC, Golling M, Bechstein WO (2006) Nutritional support after open liver resection: a systematic review. Dig Surg 23:139–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Doig GS, Heighes PT, Simpson F, Sweetman EA, Davies AR (2009) Early enteral nutrition, provided within 24 h of injury or intensive care unit admission, significantly reduces mortality in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Intensive Care Med 35:2018–2027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Cahill NE, Dhaliwal R, Day AG, Jiang X, Heyland DK (2010) Nutrition therapy in the critical care setting: what is "best achievable" practice? An international multicenter observational study. Crit Care Med 38:395–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Heyland DK, Cahill NE, Dhaliwal R, Sun X, Day AG, McClave SA (2010) Impact of enteral feeding protocols on enteral nutrition delivery: results of a multicenter observational study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 34:675–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H (2002) Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth 89:622–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Walsh SR, Tang TY, Farooq N, Coveney EC, Gaunt ME (2008) Perioperative fluid restriction reduces complications after major gastrointestinal surgery. Surgery 143:466–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I (2005) Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 103:25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen PE, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F (2003) Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238:641–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. MacKay G, Fearon K, McConnachie A, Serpell MG, Molloy RG, O'Dwyer PJ (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 93:1469–1474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Vermeulen H, Hofland J, Legemate DA, Ubbink DT (2009) Intravenous fluid restriction after major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded clinical trial. Trials 10:50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H (2009) 'Liberal' vs. 'restrictive' perioperative fluid therapy—a critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:843–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Holte K, Kehlet H (2006) Fluid therapy and surgical outcomes in elective surgery: a need for reassessment in fast-track surgery. J Am Coll Surg 202:971–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Rahbari NN, Zimmermann JB, Schmidt T, Koch M, Weigand MA, Weitz J (2009) Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 96:331–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED (2005) Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 9:R687–R693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A (2010) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg (in press)

  82. Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z'graggen K (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ghaferi AA, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2010) Hospital characteristics associated with failure to rescue from complications after pancreatectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211:325–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Buchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, Dematteo RP, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: A definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery (in press)

  89. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Adam R, Koch M, Makuuchi M, Dematteo RP, Christophi C, Banting S, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Yokoyama Y, Fan ST, Nimura Y, Figueras J, Capussotti L, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: A definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery (in press)

  90. Welsch T, von Frankenberg M, Schmidt J, Büchler MW (2011) Diagnosis and definition of anastomotic leakage from the surgeon's perspective. Chirurg 82:48–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Kortgen A, Niederprum P, Bauer M (2006) Implementation of an evidence-based "standard operating procedure" and outcome in septic shock. Crit Care Med 34:943–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Nachtigall I, Tamarkin A, Tafelski S, Deja M, Halle E, Gastmeier P, Wernecke KD, Bauer T, Kastrup M, Spies C (2009) Impact of adherence to standard operating procedures for pneumonia on outcome of intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 37:159–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Schwarzbach M, Bonninghoff R, Harrer K, Weiss J, Denz C, Schnulle P, Birck R, Post S, Ronellenfitsch U (2010) Effects of a clinical pathway on quality of care in kidney transplantation: a non-randomized clinical trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Schwarzbach M, Rossner E, Schattenberg T, Post S, Hohenberger P, Ronellenfitsch U (2010) Effects of a clinical pathway of pulmonary lobectomy and bilobectomy on quality and cost of care. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1139–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Schwarzbach MH, Ronellenfitsch U, Wang Q, Rossner ED, Denz C, Post S, Hohenberger P (2010) Effects of a clinical pathway for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) on quality and cost of care. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:333–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Lemmens L, van ZR, Vanhaecht K, Kerkkamp H (2008) Systematic review: indicators to evaluate effectiveness of clinical pathways for gastrointestinal surgery. J Eval Clin Pract 14:880–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Muller MK, Dedes KJ, Dindo D, Steiner S, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA (2009) Impact of clinical pathways in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:31–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Munitiz V, Martinez-de-Haro LF, Ortiz A, Ruiz-de-Angulo D, Pastor P, Parrilla P (2010) Effectiveness of a written clinical pathway for enhanced recovery after transthoracic (Ivor Lewis) oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 97:714–718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Vincent JL (2005) Give your patient a fast hug (at least) once a day. Crit Care Med 33:1225–1229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus W. Büchler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Linke, G.R., Mieth, M., Hofer, S. et al. Surgical intensive care unit – essential for good outcome in major abdominal surgery?. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396, 417–428 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0758-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0758-y

Keywords

Navigation