Abstract
Background
Despite randomized trials showing no benefit, drain use after open cholecystectomy continues, perhaps as a result of more complicated patient presentation. We examined the reasons for drain use in patients undergoing open cholecystectomy and evaluated the effect of drain placement on surgical outcomes.
Methods
Univariate and multivariate analyses compared pre- and intraoperative factors associated with drain placement, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing open cholecystectomy at our institution between 2002 and 2007.
Results
In 160 patients who underwent open cholecystectomy as primary operative procedure, 92 patients (58%) had a drain placed. In 22% of the cases, the surgeon’s stated reason for drain placement was hemorrhage, abscess, non-identification of critical structures, bile spillage, or concern for a bile leak. No reason was provided in78% of the operative reports. Multivariate analysis revealed diagnoses of acute, chronic, or gangrenous cholecystitis (n = 120, 75%), intraoperative bile spillage (n = 60, 38%), and higher than median intraoperative blood loss (>200 ml) as independent predictors of drain use (all p ≤ 0.042). Patients with drains had increased length of hospital stay, postoperative ICU admissions, rates of hospital re-admission, and use of post-operative endoscopy (all p ≤ 0.04). Patients with and without drains had similar rates of postoperative percutaneous drainage, bile leaks, intra-abdominal abscesses, wound infections, and deaths (all p ≥ 0.121).
Conclusions
The use of drains after open cholecystectomy was associated with complicated patient presentations: cholecystitis, intraoperative bile spillage, and high intraoperative blood loss. These patients had longer and more complicated postoperative course and more re-admissions. However, use of intraoperative drains was not associated with a reduction in the need for postoperative percutaneous drainage or in improvement in the rates of bile leaks, infections, or deaths.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lewis RT, Goodall RG, Marien B et al (1990) Simple elective cholecystectomy: to drain or not. Am J Surg 159:241–245
Monson JR, Guillou PJ, Keane FB et al (1991) Cholecystectomy is safer without drainage: the results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surgery 109:740–746
Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated open cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006003
Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Mullerat P et al (2007) Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006004
Visser BC, Parks RW, Garden OJ (2008) Open cholecystectomy in the laparoendoscopic era. Am J Surg 195:108–114
Kraut EJ, Anderson JT, Safwat A et al (1999) Impairment of cardiac performance by laparoscopy in patients receiving positive end-expiratory pressure. Arch Surg 134:76–80
Karayiannakis AJ, Polychronidis A, Perente S et al (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 18:97–101
Strasberg SM (2005) Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201:604–611
Holcomb GW, Olsen DO, Sharp KW (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the pediatric patient. J Pediatr Surg 26:1186–1190
Holzman MD, Sharp K, Holcomb GW et al (1994) An alternative technique for laparoscopic cholangiography. Surg Endosc 8:927–930
Askew J (2005) A survey of the current surgical treatment of gallstones in Queensland. ANZ J Surg 75:1086–1089
Schein M (2008) To drain or not to drain? The role of drainage in the contaminated and infected abdomen: an international and personal perspective. World J Surg 32:312–321
Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K et al (1996) Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 171:158–162
Sun HC, Qin LX, Lu L et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method. Br J Surg 93:422–426
Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V et al (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–1084 discussion 1084-1075
de Rougemont O, Dutkowski P, Weber M et al (2009) Abdominal drains in liver transplantation: useful tool or useless dogma? A matched case-control study. Liver Transplant 15:96–101
Jiao LR, Habib NA (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method (Br J Surg 2006; 93: 422-426). Br J Surg 93:1024–1025 author reply 1025
Wahl WL, Brandt MM, Hemmila MR et al (2005) Diagnosis and management of bile leaks after blunt liver injury. Surgery 138:742–747 discussion 747-748
Dougherty SH, Simmons RL (1992) The biology and practice of surgical drains. Part II. Curr Probl Surg 29:633–730
Acknowledgment
This study was supported in part by the institutional National Research Service Award T32 HS 013833 (VZ) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported in part by the institutional National Research Service Award T32 HS 013833 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services.
Presented in part during the 8th Congress of European Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association; Athens, Greece, June 18-20th, 2009.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaydfudim, V., Russell, R.T., Feurer, I.D. et al. Drain use after open cholecystectomy: is there a justification?. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394, 1011–1017 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0549-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0549-x