Skip to main content

Quality of care and emotional support from the inpatient cancer patient’s perspective

Abstract

Background

Patient satisfaction and emotional support are crucial elements of cancer care. Little is known, however, about which areas of care are important from the patient’s perspective and the roles emotional distress and support play in this context.

Methods

Multicenter prospective study was conducted (n = 396 cancer patients; t1 = after admission to hospital, t2 = before discharge). Quality of care was measured with the quality of care from the patient’s perspective questionnaire, and emotional distress was measured with the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Additional questions regarding emotional support wished (at t1) and provided (at t2) were administered.

Results

The patients reported that the domains of care most important to them were as follows: respect and commitment of the physicians, information before procedures, care equipment, and medical care. The areas where improvements are most obviously needed were nutrition, participation, clarity about who is responsible for personal care, and having the possibility of speaking in private with nurses and psycho-oncologists. Fifty-six percent of the patients were highly emotionally distressed, 84% wanted support from physicians, 76% from nurses, 33% from psychologists, and 7% from a pastor.

Conclusion

Emotional support is a crucial part of patient satisfaction and should be provided by several members of the oncological team, especially the patients’ physicians. In turn, it is crucial that medical professionals be equipped with good communication skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Sitzia J (1999) How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 11:319–328. doi:10.1093/intqhc/11.4.319

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lynn MR, McMillen BJ (2004) The scale product technique as a means of enhancing the measurement of patient satisfaction. Can J Nurs Res 36:66–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilde B, Larsson G, Larsson M, Starrin B (1994) Quality of care. Development of a patient-centered questionnaire based on a grounded theory model. Scand J Caring Sci 8:39–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Larsson G, Larsson BW, Munck IME (1998) Refinement of the questionnaire ‘quality of care from the patient's perspective’ using structural equation modelling. Scand J Caring Sci 12:111–118. doi:10.1080/02839319850163048

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nathorst-Böös J, Munck IME, Eckerlund I, Ekfeldt-Sandberg C (2001) An evaluation of the QSP and the QPP: two methods for measuring patient satisfaction. Int J Qual Health Care 13:257–264. doi:10.1093/intqhc/13.3.257

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilde Larsson B, Larsson G (2002) Development of a short form of the quality from the patient’s perspective (QPP) questionnaire. J Clin Nurs 11:681–687. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2002.00640.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt C, Möller J, Reibe F, Güntert B, Kremer B (2003) Patientenzufriedenheit in der stationären Versorgung. Stellenwert, Methoden und Besonderheiten. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 128:619–624. doi:10.1055/s-2003-38055

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Larsson BW, Larsson G, Chantereau MW, Von Holstein KS (2005) International comparisons of patients’ views on quality of care. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv 18:62–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beger HG (2005) 145 years of Langenbeck’s archives: the oldest journal worldwide in scientific surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:75–76. doi:10.1007/s00423-005-0548-5

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weis J, Koch U, Matthey K (1998) Need for psychosocial care of oncology patients—analysis of present state and need in Germany. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 48:417–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Faller H, Olshausen B, Flentje M (2003) Emotional distress and needs for psychosociol support among breast cancer patients at start of radiotherapy. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 53:229–235. doi:10.1055/s-2003-38864

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Muthny FA, Faller H, Küchenmeister U, Mücke K, Oberpennig R, Rodi B, Schlömer-Doll U, Schmitz-Huebner U, Stecker R, Winter B (1998) Psychoonkologie: Bedarf, Maßnahmen und Wirkungen am Beispiel des ‘Herforder Modells’. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singer S, Danker H, Dietz A, Hornemann B, Koscielny S, Oeken J, Matthäus C, Vogel H-J, Krauß O (2008) Screening for mental disorders in laryngeal cancer patients: a comparison of six methods. Psychooncology 17:280–286. doi:10.1002/pon.1229

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Singer S, Kuhnt S, Götze H, Hauss J, Hinz A, Liebmann A, Krauß O, Lehmann A, Schwarz R (2009) Hospital anxiety and depression scale cut-off scores for cancer patients in acute care. Br J Cancer 100:908–912. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604952

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ronellenfitsch U, Rössner E, Jakob J, Post S, Hohenberger P, Schwarzbach M (2008) Clinical pathways in surgery—should we introduce them into clinical routine? A review article. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:449–457. doi:10.1007/s00423-008-0303-9

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tisch M, Schettilin J, Maier H (2002) Patient satisfaction in the hospital. Results of a prospective study in an ENT department. HNO 50:70–75. doi:10.1007/s106-002-8071-4

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baberg HT, Jäger D, Bojara W, Lemke B, Von Dryander S, De Zeeuw J, Barmeyer J, Kugler J (2001) Expectations and satisfaction among patients during inpatient stay. Gesundheitswesen 63:297–301. doi:10.1055/s-2001-14213

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sitzia J, Wood N (1998) Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. Int J Qual Health Care 10:311–317. doi:10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Giebel GD, Groeben N (2008) Social desirability in the measuring of patient satisfaction after treatment of coloproctologic disorders. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:513–520. doi:10.1007/s00423-008-0310-x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Persson F, Wilde Larsson B (2005) Quality of care after ostomy surgery: a perspective study of patients. Ostomy Wound Manage 51:40–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Muntlin A, Gunningberg L, Carlsson M (2006) Patients’ perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement. J Clin Nurs 15:1045–1056. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01368.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fallowfield L (1995) Can we improve the professional and personal fulfillment of doctors in cancer medicine? Br J Cancer 71:1132–1133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fallowfield L, Lipkin M, Hall A (1998) Teaching senior oncologists communication skills: results from phase I of a comprehensive longitudinal program in the United Kingdom. J Clin Oncol 16:1961–1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Janssen C, Ommen O, Neugebauer E, Lefering R, Pfaff H (2007) How to improve satisfaction with hospital stay of severely injured patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 392:747–760. doi:10.1007/s00423-007-0186-1

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Singer.

Additional information

Supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (# 01ZZ0106).

The manuscript has not been published or submitted elsewhere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singer, S., Götze, H., Möbius, C. et al. Quality of care and emotional support from the inpatient cancer patient’s perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394, 723–731 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0489-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0489-5

Keywords

  • Patient satisfaction
  • Quality of health care
  • Needs assessment
  • Psychology
  • Neoplasms