Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microscopic cancer cell spread in gastric cancer: whole-section analysis of mesogastrium

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer cells are often found in adipose connective tissue separate from the primary lesion and outside lymph nodes on routine pathologic examination of resected gastric cancer specimens. To identify the anatomical relationship between such cancer cell spread and lymph nodes, we investigated the microscopic cancer cell spread in the mesogastrium (CSM) by the whole-section analysis of the mesogastrium.

Method

One thousand five hundred fifty-two sections of the mesogastrium obtained from 37 patients with gastric cancer were subjected. CSM is defined as the existence of cancer cell spread in the mesogastrium separate from the primary lesion.

Results

CSM was detected in three (8%) of the 37 patients. CSM was classified into three types. CSM was found in three of the 12 patients with advanced cancer, but not in 25 patients with early cancer.

Conclusions

CSM may occur in the mesogastrium separate from metastatic lymph nodes; therefore, we should pay particular attention to the potential existence of CSM in surgery for gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakamura K, Ozaki N, Yamada T et al (2005) Evaluation of prognostic significance in extracapsular spread of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. Surgery 137:511–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koike H, Ichikawa D, Kitamura K et al (2004) Perinodal involvement of cancer cells in gastric cancer patients. Surgery 135:266–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Etoh T, Sasako M, Ishikawa K et al (2006) Extranodal metastasis is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 93:369–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumagai K, Tanaka T, Yamagata K et al (2001) Liver metastasis in gastric cancer with particular reference to lymphatic advancement. Gastric Cancer 4:150–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka T, Kumagai K, Shimizu K et al (2000) Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer with particular reference to lymphatic advancement; extranodal invasion is a significant risk factor for peritoneal metastasis. J Surg Oncol 75:165–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abe N, Mori T, Takeuchi H et al (2005) Laparoscopic lymph node dissection after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a novel and minimally invasive approach to treating early-stage gastric cancer. Am J Surg 190:496–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1:10–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishigami S, Natsugoe S, Tokuda K et al (2003) Clinical impact of micrometastasis of the lymph node in gastric cancer. Am Surg 69:573–577

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahn HJ, Marks A (2002) A new monoclonal antibody, D2–40, for detection of lymphatic invasion in primary tumors. Lab Invest 82:1255–1257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gang J, Sugiyama M, Hongfang T et al (2006) Distribution of lymphatic vessels in the neural plexuses surrounding the superior mesenteric artery. Pancreas 32:62–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yonemura Y, Endou Y, Tabachi K et al (2006) Evaluation of lymphatic invasion in primary gastric cancer by a new monoclonal antibody, D2–40. Human Pathol 37:1193–1199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maehara Y, Tomisaki S, Oda S et al (1994) Lymphatic advancement to peritoneal dissemination and liver metastasis in gastric cancer patients. Anticancer Res 14:2755–2757

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Tamakusa S (1998) Prognostic significance of extranodal microscopic foci discontinuous with primary lesion in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 41:55–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ueno H, Mochizuki H (1997) Clinical significance of extranodal skipped cancer infiltration in rectal cancer. Surgery Today 27:617–622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mignano JE, Zahurak ML, Chakravarthy A et al (1999) Significance of axillary lymph node extranodal soft tissue extension and indications for postmastectomy irradiation. Cancer 86:1258–1262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Theunissen PH, Bollen EC, Koudstaal J et al (1994) Intranodal and extranodal tumour growth in early metastasized non-small cell lung cancer: problems in histological diagnosis. J Clin Pathol 47:920–923

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamashita H, Noguchi S, Murakami N et al (1997) Extracapsular invasion of lymph node metastasis is an indicator of distant metastasis and poor prognosis in patient with thyroid papillary carcinoma. Cancer 80:2268–2272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leemans CR, Tiwari R, Nauta JJ et al (1993) Regional lymph node involvement and its significance in the development of distant metastasis in head and neck carcinoma. Cancer 71:452–456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baba M, Aikou T, Natsugoe S et al (1997) Lymph node and perinodal tissue tumor involvement in patients with esophagectomy and three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus. J Surg Oncol 64:12–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsuko Nagatomo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagatomo, A., Abe, N., Takeuchi, H. et al. Microscopic cancer cell spread in gastric cancer: whole-section analysis of mesogastrium. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394, 655–660 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0427-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0427-y

Keywords

Navigation