Abstract
Introduction
Actually, thyroid volume >25 ml, obtained by preoperative ultrasound evaluation, is a very important exclusion criteria for minimally invasive thyroidectomy. So far, among different imaging techniques, two-dimensional ultrasonography has become the more accepted method for the assessment of thyroid volume (US-TV). The aims of this study were: (1) to estimate the preoperative thyroid volume in patients undergoing minimally invasive total thyroidectomy using a mathematical formula and (2) to verify its validity by comparing it with the postsurgical TV (PS-TV).
Materials and method
In 53 patients who underwent minimally invasive total thyroidectomy (from January 2003 to December 2007), US-TV, obtained by ellipsoid volume formula, was compared to PS-TV determined by the Archimedes’ principle. A mathematical formula able to predict the TV from the US-TV was applied in 34 cases in the last 2 years.
Results
Mean US-TV (14.4 ± 5.9 ml) was significantly lower than mean PS-TV (21.7 ± 10.3 ml). This underestimation was related to gland multinodularity and/or nodular involvement of the isthmus. A mathematical formula to reduce US-TV underestimation and predict the real TV was developed using a linear model. Mean predicted TV (16.8 ± 3.7 ml) perfectly matched mean PS-TV, underestimating PS-TV in 19% of cases. We verified the accuracy of this mathematical model in patients’ eligibility for minimally invasive total thyroidectomy, and we demonstrated that a predicted TV <25 ml was confirmed post-surgery in 94% of cases.
Conclusions
We demonstrated that using a linear model, it is possible to predict from US the PS-TV with high accuracy. In fact, the mean predicted TV perfectly matched the mean PS-TV in all cases. In particular, the percentage of cases in which the predicted TV perfectly matched the PS-TV increases from 23%, estimated by US, to 43%. Moreover, the percentage of TV underestimation was reduced from 77% to 19%, as well as the range of the disagreement from up to 200% to 80%. This study shows that two-dimensional US can provide the accurate estimation of thyroid volume but that it can be improved by a mathematical model. This may contribute to a more appropriate surgical management of thyroid diseases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G, Minuto M, Barellino L (2004) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: five years of experience. J Am Coll Surg 199:243–248
Gagner M, Inabnet WB III (2001) Endoscopic thyroidectomy for solitary thyroid nodules. Thyroid 11:161–163
Bellantone R, Lombardi C, Raffaeli M, Boscherini M, De Crea C, Traini E (2002) Video-assisted thyroidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 194:610–614
Ruggieri M, Straniero A, Genderini M, D’Armiento M, Fumarola A, Trimboli P, Gargiulo P (2007) The eligibility of MIVA approach in thyroid surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 392:413–416
World Health Organization (1994) Indicators for assessing iodine deficiency disorders and their control through salt iodization. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (Document No WHO/NUT94.6)
Shabana W, Peeters E, De Maeseneer M (2006) Measuring thyroid gland volume: should we change the correction factor. Am J Roentgenol 186:234–236
Van Isselt JW, de Klerk JM, van Rijk PP, van Gils APG, Polman LJ, Kamphuis C, Mejier R, Beekman FJ (2003) Comparison of methods for thyroid volume estimation in patients with Graves’ disease. Eur Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:525–531
Sheikh M, Doi SAR, Sinan T, Al-Shoumer KAS (2004) Technical observation on the assessment of thyroid volume by palpation and ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 23:261–266
Nygaard B, Nygaard T, Court-Payen M, Ingeman Jensen L, Søe-Jensen P, Gerhard Nielsen K, Fugl M, Hegedus L (2002) Thyroid volume measured by ultrasonography and CT. Acta Radiol 43:269–274
Rago T, Bencivelli W, Scutari M, Di Cosmo C, Rizzo C, Berti P, Miccoli P, Pinchera A, Vitti P (2006) The newly developed three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) thyroid ultrasound are strongly correlated, but 2D overestimates thyroid volume in the presence of nodules. J Endocrinol Invest 29:423–426
Brown MC, Spencer R (1978) Thyroid gland estimated by use of ultrasound in addition to scintigraphy. Acta Radiol Oncol Rad Phys Biol 17:337–341
Brunn J, Block U, Ruf G, Bos I, Kunze WP, Scriba PC (1981) Volumetric analysis of thyroid lobes by real-time ultrasound. Dt med Wschr 106:1338–1340
Schlogl S, Werner E, Lessmann M, Terekhova J, Muffert S, Seybold S, Reiners C (2001) The use of three-dimensional ultrasound for thyroid volumetry. Thyroid 11:569–574
Miccoli P, Minuto M, Orlandini C, Galleri D, Massi M, Berti P (2006) Ultrasonography estimated thyroid volume: a prospective study about its reliability. Thyroid 16:37–39
Hussy E, Voth E, Schicha H (2000) Sonography determination of thyroid volume: comparison with surgical data. Nuklearmedizin 39:102–107
Trimboli P, Ruggieri M, Fumarola A, D’Alò M, Straniero A, Maiuolo A, Ulisse S, D’Armiento M (2008) A mathematical formula to estimate in vivo thyroid volume from two-dimensional ultrasonography. Thyroid 18(8):879–882
Shabana W, Peeters E, Verbeek P, Osteaux MM (2003) Reducing inter-observer variation in thyroid volume calculation using a new formula and technique. Eur J Ultrasound 16:207–210
Schlögl S, Andermann P, Luster M, Reiners C, Lassmann M (2006) A novel thyroid phantom for ultrasound volumetry: determination of intraobserver and interobserver variability. Thyroid 16:41–46
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruggieri, M., Fumarola, A., Straniero, A. et al. The estimation of the thyroid volume before surgery—an important prerequisite for minimally invasive thyroidectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393, 721–724 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0399-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0399-y