Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of a structured training programme in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an established treatment for almost all gallbladder diseases with bile duct injury rates similar to open cholecystectomy. These laparoscopic skills must be passed on to junior surgeons without compromising patient safety.

Materials and methods

We analysed our structured training programme over 6years (May 2000 to May 2006) by following three trainee surgeons during their training and beyond. During this period, 1,000 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were carried out with five consultant surgeons supervising and three new trainees who completed their accreditation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Results

There were 694 patients operated on by consultant surgeons (Group 1), 202 by trainee surgeons (Group 2) and 104 by newly trained surgeons (Group 3). There were no differences between the groups in terms of age and gender. However, there was a significant difference in gallbladder disease among the three groups; Group 2 had more gallstone pancreatitis patients (P < 0.019). There were no differences among the three groups in conversion rates, bile duct injury rates, general complication rates or length of stay. However, the duration of operation in Group 2 was significantly longer compared to the other two groups (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

This programme is effective in training junior surgeons and does not compromise patient safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lichten JB, Reid JJ, Zahalsky MP, Friedman RL (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the new millennium. Surg Endosc 15:867–872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shoemaker CP Jr (2003) Changes in the general surgical workload, 1991–1999. Arch Surg 138:417–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. EAES (1994) Guidelines: training and assessment of competence. Surg Endosc 8:721–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. SAGES (1991) Granting of privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J Surg 161:324–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. SAGES (1993) Guidelines for institutions granting privileges utilizing laparoscopic and/or thorascopic techniques. Surg Endosc 7:67–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. SAGES (1994) Framework for post-residency surgical education and training. SAGES Guidel 8:1137–1147

    Google Scholar 

  7. New York State Department of Health (1992) Laparoscopic surgery. New York State Department of Health Memorandum Series 92. New York State Department of Health, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dent TL (1991) Training, credentialing and granting of clinical privileges for laparoscopic general surgery. Am J Surg 161:399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lau H, Brooks DC (2002) Transitions in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the impact of ambulatory surgery. Surg Endosc 16:323–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu JS, Dunnegan DL, Luttmann DR, Soper NJ (1998) The evolution and maturation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an academic practice. J Am Coll Surg 186:554–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. MacFadyen BV Jr (2004) Teaching, training and clinical surgery. Surg Endosc 18:361–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM (2003) Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 17:1525–1529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Adrales GL, Chu UB, Hoskins JD, Witzke DB, Park AE (2004) Development of a valid, cost-effective laparoscopic training program. Am J Surg 187:157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Adrales GL, Park AE, Chu UB, Witzke DB, Donnelly MB, Hoskins JD, Mastrangelo MJ Jr, Gandsas A (2003) A valid method of laparoscopic simulation training and competence assessment. J Surg Res 114:156–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiasson PM, Pace DE, Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Poulin EC (2003) Minimally invasive surgery training in Canada: a survey of general surgery. Surg Endosc 17:371–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rattner DW, Apelgren KN, Eubanks WS (2001) The need for training opportunities in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 15:1066–1070

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, Chu KM (1996) Factors affecting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Arch Surg 131:98–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dagash H, Chowdhury M, Pierro A (2003) When can I be proficient in laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of the evidence. J Pediatr Surg 38:720–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elliot DL, Hickam DH (1987) Evaluation of physical examination skills. Reliability of faculty observers and patient instructors. JAMA 258:3405–3408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Warf BC, Donnelly MB, Schwartz RW, Sloan DA (1999) The relative contributions of interpersonal and specific clinical skills to the perception of global clinical competence. J Surg Res 86:17–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salleh Ibrahim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, S., Tay, K.H., Lim, S.H. et al. Analysis of a structured training programme in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393, 943–948 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-007-0269-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-007-0269-z

Keywords

Navigation