Abstract
Background and aims
Controversy still exists about the need for pyloric drainage procedures (pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy) after esophagectomy with esophagogastrostomy and vagotomy. Although pyloric drainage may prevent postoperative delayed gastric emptying, it may also promote bile reflux into the oesophagus. We analysed pyloric drainage methods for their potential effect on gastric outlet obstruction and bile reflux in patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Materials and methods
One hundred and ninety-eight patients with esophageal carcinoma were treated by transthoracal esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction either with pyloromyotomy (group II, n = 118), pyloroplasty (group III, n = 34) or without pyloric drainage (group I, n = 46) between January 2000 and December 2004. The postoperative gastrointestinal passage by radiological investigation, anastomotic leakage rate, mortality and incidence of gastroesophageal reflux by endoscopy within the first postoperative year were retrospectively analysed.
Results
Patient demographics and the types of surgical procedures did not differ between the three groups. There was no difference in hospital mortality, anastomotic leakage rate, gastrointestinal passage and postoperative hospital stay between the three groups. However, more patients with pyloric drainage showed bile reflux (I = 0% vs II+III=14.9%, p = 0.069) and reflux esophagitis (I = 10.3% vs II+III = 34.5%, p < 0.05) compared to patients without pyloric drainage. On the multivariate analysis, pyloric drainage and the anastomotic height were independent and were significant risk factors associated with postoperative reflux esophagitis.
Conclusion
Pyloric drainage after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction should be omitted because it does not improve gastric emptying and may favour biliary reflux esophagitis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF (1998) Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 83:2049–2053
Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Tabara H, Nagasue N (2004) En-bloc esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 188:254–260
Korst RJ (2005) Surgical resection for esophageal carcinoma: speaking the language. World J Gastroenterol 11:2211–2212
Yildirim S, Koksal H, Celayir F, Erdem L, Oner M, Baykan A (2004) Colonic interposition vs gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 8:675–678
Lerut T, Coosemans W, DeLeyn P, VanRaemdonck D (2001) Gastroplasty: yes or no to gastric drainage procedure. Dis Esophagus 14:173–177
Visbal AL, Allen MS, Miller DL, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC (2001) Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1803–1808
Fok M, Cheng SWK, Wong J (1991) Pyloroplasty versus no drainage in gastric replacement of the esophagus. Am J Surg 162:447–452
Bonavina L, Anselmino M, Ruol A, Bardini R, Borsato N, Peacchia A (1992) Functional evaluation of the intrathoracic stomach as an esophageal substitute. Br J Surg 79:529–532
Law S, Cheung MC, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J (1997) Pyloroplasty and pyloromyotomy in gastric replacement of the esophagus after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 184:630–636
Huang GJ, Zhang DW (1985) A comparative study of resection of carcinoma of the esophagus with and without pyloroplasty. In: Demeester TR, Skinner DB (eds) Esophageal disorders pathophysiology and therapy. Raven, New York, pp 383–388
Chattopadhyay TK, Gupta S, Padhy AK, Kapoor VK (1991) Is pyloroplasty necessary following intrathoracic transposition of stomach? Results of a prospective clinical study. Aust N Z J Surg 61:366–369
Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE, Miller JD, Bennett WF (2002) Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg 19:160–164
Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1998) The denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute is a contractile organ. Ann Surg 227:33–39
Johansson J, Sloth M, Bajc M, Walther B (1999) Radioisotope evaluation of the esophageal remnant and the gastric conduit after gastric pull-up esophagectomy. Surgery 125:297–303
Walsh TN, Caldwell MT, Fallon C, McGeown G, Kidney D, Freyne P, Byrne PJ, Hennessy TP (1995) Gastric motility following oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 82:91–94
Gutschow CA, Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Michel JM, Salizzoni M, Hölscher A (2001) Bile exposure of the denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1786–1791
Lindahl H, Rintala R, Sariola H, Louhimo I (1990) Cervical Barrett’s esophagus: a common complication of gastric tube reconstruction. J Pediatr Surg 25:446–448
Bemelman WA, Verburg J, Brummelkamp WH, Klopper PJ (1988) A physical model of the intrathoracic stomach. Am J Physiol 254:G168–175
Acknowledgement
Data from this paper were presented at the 41th International Surgical Week in Durban, South Africa, 21–25 August 2005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palmes, D., Weilinghoff, M., Colombo-Benkmann, M. et al. Effect of pyloric drainage procedures on gastric passage and bile reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 392, 135–141 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-006-0119-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-006-0119-4