Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

We evaluated the techniques of colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction and discussed the main considerations related to these procedures.

Patients and methods

In this study, we performed 51 esophageal reconstructions using colonic interposition. Twenty-eight of the 51 patients had synchronous or allochronic gastric malignancy. We selected colonic interposition for high anastomosis in 11 patients and also for esophageal bypass in 3 patients. This procedure was also selected to preserve gastric function in 5 patients. We recently performed the supercharge technique for colonic interposition in 41 patients.

Results

Despite the long duration and multistep nature of the operation procedure, no perioperative complications were noted. The patients returned to a good quality of life. The incidence of postoperative weight loss did not differ significantly between the colonic reconstruction group and the gastric reconstruction group. In terms of heartburn and dumping syndrome, the outcome was markedly better in the colonic reconstruction group (no cases of heartburn or dumping syndrome) than that in the gastric reconstruction group.

Conclusion

For reconstruction of the esophagus, the colonic interposition and supercharge technique is advantageous and contributes to the patient’s quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Philipppe K, Pierre H, Cyril D, Jean LG, Paul G, Nicolas J (2000) Early stage result after oesophageal resection for malignancy-colon interposition vs. gastric pull-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roka S, Rath TH, Jakesz R, Wenzl E (2003) Treatment and reconstruction after disconnection of the failed cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Dis Esophagus 16:130–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hüttl TP, Wichmann MW, Geiger TK, Schildberg FW, Fürst H (2002) Technical and result of esophageal cancer surgery in Germany. Langenbecks Arch Surg 287:125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis PA, Law S, Wong J (2003) Colonic interposition after esophagectomy for cancer. Arch Surg 138:303–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cense HA, Visser MRM, Sandick JWV, Boer AGEM, Obertop BLH, Lanschot JJBV (2004) Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement. J Surg Oncol 88:32–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ando N, Shinozawa Y, Ikehara Y, Ohmori T, Abe O (1990) Postoperative nutritional status in patients with esophageal carcinoma. In: Skinner DB (ed) Disease of the Esophagus. Futura Publishing, Mount Kisco, pp 261–269

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lerenz TM, Fok M, Wong J (1989) Anastomotic leakage after resection and bypass for esophageal cancer: lessons learned from the past. World J Surg 13:472–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Seido N, Yamamoto Y, Minakawa H, Sasaki S, Furukawa H, Sugihara T, Nohira K, Yajima K, Shintomi Y, Okushiba S, Kato H, Hosokawa M (2003) Use of the “supercharge” technique in esophageal and pharyngeal reconstruction to argument microvascular blood flow. Surgery 134:420–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gormann JH III, Low DW, Guy TS IV, Gormann RC (2003) Extended left colon interposition for esophageal replacement using arterial argumentation. Ann Thorac Surg 76:933–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Inoue Y, Tai Y, Fujita H, Tanaka S, Migita H, Kiyokawa K, Hirano M, Kakegawa T (1994) A retrospective study of 66 esophageal reconstructions using microvascular anastomoses: problems and our methods for atypical cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:227–287

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alexandrou A, Peter AD, Simon L, Brian PW, Sudish CM, John W (2002) Esophageal cancer in patients with a history of distal gastrectomy. Arch Surg 137:1238–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH (eds) (2002) UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York

  13. Surkin MI, Lawson W, Biller HF (1984) Analysis of the methods of pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. Head Neck Surg 6:953–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlson GW, Schusterman MA, Guillamendegui OM (1992) Total reconstruction of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus: a 20-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 29:408–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller JI, Lee RB (1992) Free jejunal interposition of the esophagus. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 4:286–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher SR, Cole B, Meyers WC, Seigler HF (1985) Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction using free jejunal interposition grafts. Arch Otolaryngol 111:747–752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Omura K, Misaki T, Urayama H, Ishida F, Watanabe Y (1993) Composite reconstruction of the esophagus. J Surg Oncol 52:18–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases (1999) Guidelines for the clinical and pathological studies on carcinoma of the esophagus, 9th edn. Kanehara, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang TD, Sun YE, Chen Y (1986) Free jejunal grafts for reconstruction of pharynx and cervical esophagus. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 95:348–351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Flynn MB, Banis J, Acland R (1989) Reconstruction with free bowel autografts after pharyngoesophageal or laryngopharyngoesophageal resection. Am J Surg 168:333–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Biel MA, Maiseal RH (1987) Free jejunal autograft reconstruction of the pharyngoesophagus: review of a 10-year experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 96:369–375

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshio Naomoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shirakawa, Y., Naomoto, Y., Noma, K. et al. Colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391, 19–23 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0010-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0010-8

Keywords

Navigation