Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of bone anchors in perineal hernia repair: a practical note

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bone anchoring systems are used extensively in orthopaedic surgery but have scarcely been reported as useful in abdominal wall or perineal hernia repair. After coccygectomy or sacrectomy the development of bowel herniation is not uncommon. Considering repair of such a perineal hernia, adequate fixation of the prosthetic mesh is difficult and, therefore, recurrence is rather frequent, mostly due to insufficient anchoring of the mesh to the bony structures.

Methods

We discuss a patient in which the Mitek GII anchoring system was used to overcome the problem of soft-tissue-to-bone attachment in such cases.

Conclusion

Bone anchoring systems seem to be an efficient method to overcome the problems of soft-tissue-to bone attachment in both abdominal and perineal hernia repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Santora TA, Kaplan LJ, Sherk HH (1998) Perineal hernia: an undescribed complication following sacrectomy. Orthopedics 21:203–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia FJ, Franco JD, Marquez R, Martinez JA, Medina J (1998) Posterior hernia of the rectum after coccygectomy. Eur J Surg 164:793–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frydman GM, Polglase AL(1989) Perineal approach for polypropylene mesh repair of perineal hernia. Aust N Z J Surg 59:895–897

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Villar F, Frampas E, Mirallie E, Potiron L, Villet R, Lehur PA (2003) Perineal incisional hernia following rectal resection. Diagnosis and management. Ann Chir 128:246–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, et al (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rehak DC, Sotereanos DG, Bowman MW, Herndon JH (1994) The Mitek bone anchor: application to the hand, wrist and elbow. J Hand Surg [Am] 19:853–860

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hom D, Desautel MG, Lumerman JH, Feraren RE, Badlani GH (1998) Pubovaginal sling using polypropylene mesh and vesica bone anchors. Urology 51:708–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fergestad J, Noonan KJ, Mack E (2003) An innovative approach for repair of complex inguinal and abdominal wall hernias. J Am Coll Surg 197:1050–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rossouw DJ, McElroy BJ, Amis AA, Emery RJ (1997) A biomechanical evaluation of suture anchors in repair of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:458–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Enzler M, Agins HJ, Kogan M, Kudurna J, Sand P, Wurtz R, Culligan P (1999) Osteomyelitis of the pubis following suspension of the neck of the bladder with use of bone anchors: a report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1736–1740

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik Berrevoet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berrevoet, F., Pattyn, P. Use of bone anchors in perineal hernia repair: a practical note. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390, 255–258 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0523-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0523-6

Keywords

Navigation