Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Survival after surgical treatment of cancer of the rectum

  • Current Concepts in Clinical Surgery
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Rectal carcinoma is one of the most prevalent tumour types. Prognostic factors are of special interest to estimate prognosis of the individual patient.

Patients/methods

The data of 1,067 consecutive patients with solitary invasive rectal carcinoma, resected between 1988 and 1999 at the Department of Surgery of the University of Erlangen, were analysed. Cancer-related survival rate was calculated by univariate and multivariate analysis with respect to all relevant proven and probable prognostic factors.

Results

The R classification was found to be the parameter with the greatest influence on survival of patients with rectal carcinoma. Other tumour-related prognostic factors that influenced prognosis significantly were the anatomical extent, described by the TNM classification of the UICC, tumour grade and extramural venous invasion (EVI). In addition, the operating surgeon, a therapy-related factor, and the preoperative serum CEA level were found to influence prognosis.

Conclusion

Tumour-related prognostic factors have the greatest influence on clinical decisions with regard to choice of a therapeutic concept. The increasing survival rates after treatment of rectal carcinoma have led to a focus on postoperative quality of life. Postoperative long-term global quality of life is similar to the preoperative level. Oncological outcome is still the most important factor, and tumour recurrence leads to a strong impairment of quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Bray F, Sankila R, Parkin DM (1999) EUCAN: Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence in the European Union 1998. IARC, Lyon

  2. Hermanek P, Wiebelt H, Staimmer D, Riedl S (1995) Prognostic factors of rectum carcinoma—experience of the German Multicentre Study SGCRC. German Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma. Tumori 81:60–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hermanek P (1999) Impact of surgeon’s technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 42:559–562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Porter GA, Soskolne CL, Yakimets WW, Newman SC (1998) Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 227:157–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Granero E, Marti-Obiol R, Gomez-Barbadillo J, Garcia-Armengol J, Esclapez P, Espi A, Jimenez E, Millan M, Lledo S (2001) Impact of surgeon organization and specialization in rectal cancer outcome. Colorectal Dis 3:179–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJ (2002) Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Surg 89:1142–1149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Moran BJ, Heald RJ, Cedemark B (2000) Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 356:93–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JH (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20:1729–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hohenberger W (1997) The effect of specialisation or organisation of rectal cancer surgery. In: Soreide O, Norstein J (eds) Rectal cancer surgery. Optimisation–standardisation–documentation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 353–363

  10. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, van Krieken JH, Leer JW, van de Velde CJ (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. (1996) Local recurrence rate in a randomised multicentre trial of preoperative radiotherapy compared with operation alone in resectable rectal carcinoma. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. Eur J Surg 162:397–402

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, Fielding LP (2000) American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer 88:1739–1757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V. (2004) Qualitätssicherung in der Onkologie. Diagnostik und Therapie maligner Erkrankungen. Kurzgefasste Interdisziplinäre Leitlinien. W. Zuckschwerdt, München

  14. Soreide O, Norstein J, Fielding LP, Silen W (1997) International standardization and documentation of the treatment of rectal cancer. In: Soreide O, Norstein J (eds) Rectal cancer surgery. Optimisation–standardisation–documentation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 405–445

  15. Wagner G, Hermanek P, Wittekind C, Sinn HP (2002) Organspezifische Tumordokumentation, 2nd edn. Empfehlungen zu Dokumentationsinhalten fuer Studien. Internetfassung (“OTD-2-Internet”). http://www.krebsgesellschaft.de

  16. Jass JR, Sobin LH (1989) Histological typing of intestinal tumours. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  17. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumors. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  18. Hobday TJ, Erlichman C (2001) Colorectal cancer. In: Gospodarowicz MK, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, O’Sullivan B, Sobin LH (eds) Prognostic factors in cancer. International Union against Cancer (UICC). Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 267–279

  19. Enker WE (1997) Total mesorectal excision—the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Med 29:127–133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Mander BJ, Bissett IP, Newland RC (2003) Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46:860–866

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tominaga T, Sakabe T, Koyama Y, Hamano K, Yasutomi M, Takahashi T, Kodaira S, Kato T, Ogawa N (1996) Prognostic factors for patients with colon or rectal carcinoma treated with resection only. Five-year follow-up report. Cancer 78:403–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brenner H, Arndt V, Sturmer T, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Dhom G (2001) Long-lasting reduction of risk of colorectal cancer following screening endoscopy. Br J Cancer 85:972–976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodel C, Grabenbauer GG, Schick C, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Sauer R (2000) Preoperative radiation with concurrent 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced T4-primary rectal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 176:161–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Riedl S (1996) [Surgical therapy and prognosis of not curatively resectable rectum carcinoma. Results of a multicenter study of the Colorectal Carcinoma Study Group]. Chirurg 67:155–160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McArdle CS, Hole D (1991) Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. BMJ 302:1501–1505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jatzko GR, Jagoditsch M, Lisborg PH, Denk H, Klimpfinger M, Stettner HM, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Newland RC, Koorey SG, Zelas PJ, Stewart PJ (1999) Long-term results of radical surgery for rectal cancer: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors influencing survival and local recurrence. Factors affecting survival after excision of the rectum for cancer: a multivariate analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 25:284–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kockerling F, Reymond MA, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Dworak O, Hohenberger W (1998) Influence of surgery on metachronous distant metastases and survival in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:324–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Merkel S, Meyer T, Gohl J, Hohenberger W (2002) Late locoregional recurrence in rectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:716–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sauer R (2003) Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant combined modality treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: first results of the German rectal cancer study (CAO/ARO/AIO-94). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:S124–S125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Newland RC, Koorey SG, Zelas PJ, Stewart PJ (1997) Factors affecting survival after excision of the rectum for cancer: a multivariate analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 40:3–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sprangers MA, Cull A, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Aaronson NK (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Approach to quality of life assessment: guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. Qual Life Res 2:287–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK (1999) The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 35:238–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (2000) Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16; discussion 16–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2001) Prospective analysis of quality of life and survival following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:1617–1622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Grumann MM, Noack EM, Hoffmann IA, Schlag PM (2001) Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 233:149–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Leary DP, Fide CJ, Foy C, Lucarotti ME (2001) Quality of life after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and temporary loop ileostomy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 88:1216–1220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sailer M, Fuchs KH, Fein M, Thiede A (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing quality of life after straight and pouch coloanal reconstruction. Br J Surg 89:1108–1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hallbook O, Hass U, Wanstrom A, Sjodahl R (1997) Quality of life measurement after rectal excision for cancer. Comparison between straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 32:490–493

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2002) Prospective analysis of quality of life after reversal of a defunctioning loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 4:167–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ramsey SD, Berry K, Moinpour C, Giedzinska A, Andersen MR (2002) Quality of life in long term survivors of colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1228–1234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Batignani G, Monaci I, Ficari F, Tonelli F (1991) What affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum? Dis Colon Rectum 34:329–335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Gohl J, Hohenberger W, Matzel KE (2004) Functional outcome after intersphincteric resection of the rectum with coloanal anastomosis in low rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:260–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cavaliere F, Pemberton JH, Cosimelli M, Fazio VW, Beart RW Jr (1995) Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Long-term results at the Mayo and Cleveland Clinics. Dis Colon Rectum 38:807–812

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kohler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A, Psarakis E (2000) Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 43:843–850

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Muehldorfer S, Hohenberger W (1997) Continence after colorectal reconstruction following resection: impact of level of anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:82–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M (1994) Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 81:1376–1378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Eckel R, Sauer H, Holzel D (2003) Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study. Ann Surg 238:203–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Renner K, Rosen HR, Novi G, Holbling N, Schiessel R (1999) Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: do we still need a permanent colostomy? Dis Colon Rectum 42:1160–1167

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zieren HU, Jacobi CA, Zieren J, Muller JM (1996) [Assessment of quality of life after resection of colorectal carcinoma]. Chirurg 67:703–708; discussion 709

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2001) The impact of recurrent rectal cancer on quality of life. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:349–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hamashima C (2002) Long-term quality of life of postoperative rectal cancer patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:571–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Allal AS, Bieri S, Pelloni A, Spataro V, Anchisi S, Ambrosetti P, Sprangers MA, Kurtz JM, Gertsch P (2000) Sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers: feasibility, oncologic results and quality of life outcomes. Br J Cancer 82:1131–1137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2002) Objective assessment of morbidity and quality of life after surgery for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 4:61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Jess P, Christiansen J, Bech P (2002) Quality of life after anterior resection versus abdominoperineal extirpation for rectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 37:1201–1204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Guren MG, Wiig JN, Dueland S, Tveit KM, Fossa SD, Waehre H, Giercksky KE (2001) Quality of life in patients with urinary diversion after operation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:645–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Williams NS, Johnston D (1983) The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 70:460–462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Grundmann R, Said S, Krinke S (1989) [Quality of life after rectal resection or extirpation. A comparison using different measurement parameters]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 114:453–457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Schaube J, Scharf P, Herz R (1996) [The quality of life after extirpation of the rectum for carcinoma]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 121:153–157; discussion 158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Temple LK, Wong WD, Minsky B (2003) The impact of radiation on functional outcomes in patients with rectal cancer and sphincter preservation. Semin Radiat Oncol 13:469–477

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Frigell A, Ottander M, Stenbeck H, Pahlman L (1990) Quality of life of patients treated with abdominoperineal resection or anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Ann Chir Gynaecol 79:26–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hohenberger W, Bittorf B (2003) Quality of life after rectal excision. Colorectal Dis 5:214–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ho YH, Wong J, Goh HS (1993) Level of anastomosis and anorectal manometry in predicting function following anterior resection for adenocarcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 8:170–174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Furst A, Burghofer K, Babl-Weisbarth M, Kummel S, Tange S, Jauch KW (1998) [Functional outcome and quality of life after coloanal or colonic pouch–anal anastomosis—a prospective randomized study]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 115:621–624

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Hohenberger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hohenberger, W., Bittorf, B., Papadopoulos, T. et al. Survival after surgical treatment of cancer of the rectum. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390, 363–372 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0497-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0497-4

Keywords

Navigation