Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intra-operative tachycardia and peri-operative outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intra-operative tachycardia is a common adverse event, often recorded as an indicator for process quality in quality assurance projects in anaesthesia.

Methods

This retrospective study is based on data sets of 28,065 patients recorded with a computerised anaesthesia record-keeping system from 23 February 1999 to 31 December 2000 at a tertiary care university hospital. Cases were defined as patients with intra-operative tachycardia; references were automatically selected according to matching variables (high-risk surgery, severe congestive heart failure, severe coronary artery disease, significant carotid artery stenosis and/or history of stroke, renal failure, diabetes mellitus and urgency of surgery) in a stepwise fashion. Main outcome measures were hospital mortality, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and prolonged hospital stay. Differences in outcome measures between the matched pairs were assessed by univariate analysis. Stepwise regression models were developed to predict the impact of intra-operative tachycardia on the different outcome measures.

Results

In our study 474 patients (1.7%) were found to have had intra-operative tachycardia. Matching was successful for 99.4% of the cases, leading to 471 cases and references. The crude mortality rates for the cases and matched references were 5.5% and 2.5%, respectively (P=0.020). Of all case patients, 22.3% were treated in an ICU, compared to 11.0% of the matched references (P=0.001). Hospital stay was prolonged in 25.1% of the patients with tachycardia compared to 15.1% of the matched references (P=0.001).

Conclusions

In this study, patients with intra-operative tachycardia who were undergoing non-cardiac surgery had a greater peri-operative risk, leading to increased mortality, greater frequency of admission to an ICU and prolonged hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanborn KV, Castro J, Kuroda M, Thys DM (1996) Detection of intraoperative incidents by electronic scanning of computerised anesthesia records. Comparison with voluntary reporting. Anesthesiology 85:977–987

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DGAI-Kommission "Qualitätssicherung und Datenverarbeitung in der Anästhesie" (1993) Kerndatensatz Qualitätssicherung in der Anästhesie. Anästh Intensivmed 34:331–335

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ouchterlony J, Arvidsson S, Sjostedt L, Svardsudd K (1995) Perioperative and immediate postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing elective general and orthopaedic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 39:643–652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper JB, Cullen DJ, Nemeskal R, et al (1987) Effects of information feed-back and pulse oximetry on the incidence of anaesthesia complications. Anesthesiology 67:686–694

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Benson M, Junger A, Quinzio L, et al (2001) Influence of the method of data collection on the documentation of blood-pressure readings with an anesthesia information management system (AIMS). Methods Inf Med 40:190–195

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen MM, Duncan PG, Pope DB, Wolkenstein C (1986) A survey of 112.000 anaesthetics at one teaching hospital (1975–1983). Can Anaesth Soc J 33: 22–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rose DK, Cohen MM, DeBoer DP (1996) Cardiovascular events in the postanesthesia care unit: contribution of risk factors. Anesthesiology 84:772–781

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reich DL, Bennett-Guerrero E, Bodian CA, Hossain S, Winfree W, Krol M (2002) Intraoperative tachycardia and hypertension are independently associated with adverse outcome in noncardiac surgery of long duration. Anesth Analg 95:273–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lerou JG, Dirksen R, van Daele M, Nijhuis GM, Crul JF (1988) Automated charting of physiological variables in anesthesia: a quantitative comparison of automated versus handwritten anesthesia records. J Clin Monit 4:37–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reich DL, Wood RK, Mattar R, et al (2000) Arterial blood pressure and heart rate discrepancies between handwritten and computerised anesthesia records. Anesth Analg 91:612–616

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook RI, McDonald JS, Nunziata E (1989) Differences between handwritten and automatic blood pressure records. Anesthesiology 71:385–390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reich DL, Bodian CA, Krol M, Kuroda M, Osinski T, Thys DM (1999) Intraoperative hemodynamic predictors of mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg 89:814–822

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Benson M, Junger A, Quinzio L, et al (2000) Clinical and practical requirements of online software for anesthesia documentation: an experience report. Int J Med Inf 57:155–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benson M, Junger A, Quinzio L, et al (2000) Data processing at the anesthesia workstation: from data entry to data presentation. Methods Inf Med 39:319–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al (1999) Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 100:1043–1049

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Oostrom J, Gravenstein C, Gravenstein J (1993) Acceptable ranges for vital signs during general anesthesia. J Clin Monit 9:321–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwilk B, Muche R, Treiber H, Brinkmann A, Georgieff M, Bothner U (1998) A cross-validated multifactorial index of perioperative risks in adults undergoing anaesthesia for non-cardiac surgery. J Clin Monit 14:283–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Junger A, Veit C, Klöss T (1998) Erfahrungsbericht über vier Jahre externe Qualitätssicherung in der Anästhesiologie in Hamburg. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 33:417–424

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, et al. (1977) Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med 297:845–850

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Auerbach AD, Goldman L (2002) Beta-blockers and reduction of cardiac events in noncardiac surgery: clinical applications. JAMA 287:1445–1447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Statistical analysis was performed in co-operation with Moredata GmbH, Giessen, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Axel Junger.

Additional information

Financial support for this study was provided in part by a grant from IMESO GmbH, Hüttenberg, Germany. The founding agreement ensured the authors' independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, and writing and publishing the report

M. B. is a partner of the IMESO GmbH (Hüttenberg, Germany) and employee of the University Hospital of Giessen. None of the other authors or participants has any financial interest in the subject matter, materials, or equipment discussed, or in competing materials

A part of the results has been presented as a lecture at the 50th German Congress of Anaesthesiology (DAC 2003, 9–12 April) in Munich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartmann, B., Junger, A., Röhrig, R. et al. Intra-operative tachycardia and peri-operative outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388, 255–260 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-003-0398-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-003-0398-y

Keywords

Navigation