The Green’s function formalism as a bridge between single- and multi-compartmental modeling
- 436 Downloads
Neurons are spatially extended structures that receive and process inputs on their dendrites. It is generally accepted that neuronal computations arise from the active integration of synaptic inputs along a dendrite between the input location and the location of spike generation in the axon initial segment. However, many application such as simulations of brain networks use point-neurons—neurons without a morphological component—as computational units to keep the conceptual complexity and computational costs low. Inevitably, these applications thus omit a fundamental property of neuronal computation. In this work, we present an approach to model an artificial synapse that mimics dendritic processing without the need to explicitly simulate dendritic dynamics. The model synapse employs an analytic solution for the cable equation to compute the neuron’s membrane potential following dendritic inputs. Green’s function formalism is used to derive the closed version of the cable equation. We show that by using this synapse model, point-neurons can achieve results that were previously limited to the realms of multi-compartmental models. Moreover, a computational advantage is achieved when only a small number of simulated synapses impinge on a morphologically elaborate neuron. Opportunities and limitations are discussed.
KeywordsMorphological simplification Cable theory Interacting synapses Green’s function formalism Transfer functions
We thank Marc-Oliver Gewaltig for comments on the manuscript and Moritz Deger for helpful discussion. This work was supported by the BrainScaleS EU FET-proactive FP7 grant.
- Agmon-Snir H, Carr CE, Rinzel J (1998) The role of dendrites in auditory coincidence detection. Nature 393:268–272Google Scholar
- Blackman R, Tukey J (1958) The measurement of power spectra. Dover publications, NYGoogle Scholar
- Brette R, Rudolph M, Carnevale T, Hines M, Beeman D, Bower JM, Diesmann M, Morrison A, Goodman PH, Harris FC, Zirpe M, Natschläger T, Pecevski D, Ermentrout B, Djurfeldt M, Lansner A, Rochel O, Vieville T, Muller E, Davison AP, El Boustani S, Destexhe A (2007) Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: a review of tools and strategies. J Comput Neurosci 23(3):349–398Google Scholar
- Bullock TH, Horridge GA (1965) Structure and function in the nervous systems of invertebrates/[by] Theodore Holmes Bullock and G. Adrian Horridge. With chapters by Howard A. Bern, Irvine R. Hagadorn [and] J. E. Smith. W. H. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Hay E, Schürmann F, Markram H, Segev I (2013) Preserving axo-somatic spiking features despite diverse dendritic morphology. J Neurophys 108:2972–2981Google Scholar
- Koch C (1998) Biophysics of computation: information processing in single neurons (computational neuroscience), 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Koch C, Poggio T (1985) A simple algorithm for solving the cable equation in dendritic trees of arbitrary geometry. J Neurosci Methods 12:303–315Google Scholar
- Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes 3rd edition: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Vervaeke K, Lorincz A, Nusser Z, Silver RA (2012) Gap junctions compensate for sublinear dendritic integration in an inhibitory network. Science (New York, N.Y.), 1624Google Scholar