Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of connection type on phase synchrony: analysis of a neural mass model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical studies have demonstrated synchronized frontal and parietal electrophysiological signals at 22–34 Hz during a conjunctive visual search task and at 36–56 Hz during a pop-out visual search task. Bidirectional (conjunctive) versus unidirectional (pop-out) information transfer between neuronal populations is hypothesized to underly this difference in synchronization frequency. This study modeled the influence of connection type (i.e., unidirectional vs. bidirectional) on phase synchrony between two neural populations using a neural mass model. Phase-locking values (PLVs) were used as the measure of synchrony between populations. Consistent with the connectivity hypothesis, the model revealed greater PLVs at 22–34 Hz when the two populations were connected bidirectionally than unidirectionally, but greater PLVs at 34–52 Hz when connected unidirectionally than bidirectionally. The model suggests that inter-population connectivity also changes with bottom-up versus top-down control of attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhattacharya J, Petsche H, Feldmanna U, Rescher B (2001) EEG gamma-band phase synchronization between posterior and frontal cortex during mental rotation in humans. Neurosci Lett 311: 29–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buschman TJ, Miller EK (2007) Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science 315: 1860–1862

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doesburg SM, Roggeveen AB, Kitajo K, Ward LM (2008) Large-scale gamma-band phase synchronization and selective attention. Cereb Cortex 18: 386–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8: 194–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes da Silva FH, Hoeks A, Smits H, Zetterberg LH (1974) Model of brain rhythmic activity: the alpha-rhythm of the thalamus. Kybernetik 15: 27–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miltner WH, Braun C, Arnold M, Witte H, Taub E (1999) Coherence of gamma-band EEG activity as a basis for associative learning. Nature 397: 434–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips S, Takeda Y (2009) Greater frontal-parietal synchrony at low gamma-band frequencies for inefficient than efficient visual search in human EEG. Int J Psychophysiol 73: 350–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips S, Takeda Y (2010) Frontal-parietal synchrony in elderly EEG for visual search. Int J Psychophysiol 75: 39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez E, George N, Lachaux JP, Martinerie J, Renault B, Varela FJ (1999) Perception’s shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature 397: 430–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singer W, Gray CM (1995) Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci 18: 555–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman AM, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognit Psychol 12: 97–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ursino M, Zavaglia M, Astolfi L, Babiloni F (2007) Use of a neural mass model for the analysis of effective connectivity among cortical regions based on high resolution EEG recordings. Biol Cybern 96: 351–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varela FJ, Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J (2001) The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 229–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wendling F, Bartolomei F, Bellanger JJ, Chauvel P (2002) Epileptic fast activity can be explained by a model of impaired GABAergic dendritic inhibition. Eur J Neurosci 15: 1499–1508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zavaglia M, Astolfi L, Babiloni F, Ursino M (2006) A neural mass model for the simulation of cortical activity estimated from high resolution EEG during cognitive or motor tasks. J Neurosci Methods 157: 317–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Takeda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takeda, Y. Influence of connection type on phase synchrony: analysis of a neural mass model. Biol Cybern 105, 349–354 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-011-0470-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-011-0470-6

Keywords

Navigation