Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of directed interactions in networks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multichannel data collection in the neurosciences is routine and has necessitated the development of methods to identify the direction of interactions among processes. The most widely used approach for detecting these interactions in such data is based on autoregressive models of stochastic processes, although some work has raised the possibility of serious difficulties with this approach. This article demonstrates that these difficulties are present and that they are intrinsic features of the autoregressive method. Here, we introduce a new method taking into account unobserved processes and based on coherence. Two examples of three-process networks are used to demonstrate that although coherence measures are intrinsically non-directional, a particular network configuration will be associated with a particular set of coherences. These coherences may not specify the network uniquely, but in principle will specify all network configurations consistent with their values and will also specify the relationships among the unobserved processes. Moreover, when new information becomes available, the values of the measures of association already in place do not change, but the relationships among the unobserved processes may become further resolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baccalá LA, Sameshima K (2001) Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 84: 463–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brillinger DR (1975) Time series: data analysis and theory. Holt Rinehart Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Bessler SL, Ding M (2006) Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potentials. J Neurosci Methods 150: 228–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dhamala M, Rangaranjan G, Ding M (2008) Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparmetric Granger causality. NeuroImage 41: 354–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ding M, Bressler SL, Yang W, Liang H (2000) Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biol Cybern 83: 35–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding M, Chen Y, Bressler SL (2006) Granger causality: basic theory and application to neuroscience. In: Schelter B, Winterhalder M, Timmer J (eds) Handbook of time series analysis—recent theoretical developments and applications. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 437–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler M (2005) A graphical approach for evaluating effective connectivity in neural systems. Philos Trans Roy Soc B 360: 953–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersch W (1972) Causality or driving in electrophysiological signal analysis. Math Biosci 14: 177–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke J (1982) Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J Am Stat Assoc 77: 304–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke J (1984) Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. J Am Stat Assoc 79: 907–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux C, Monfort A (1997) Time series and dynamic models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ (1963) Economic processes involving feedback. Inform Control 6: 28–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37: 424–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ (1980) Testing for causality—a personal viewpoint. J Econ Dyn Control 2: 329–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse W, Möller E, Matthias A, Schack B (2003) The use of time-invariant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. J Neurosci Methods 124: 27–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamiński M, Ding M, Truccolo WA, Bressler SL (2001) Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol Cybern 85: 145–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl H (1993) Introduction to multivariate time series analysis, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra P, Pesaran B (1999) Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data. Biophys J 76: 691–708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parzen E (1982) Measurement of linear dependence between multiple time series: comment. J Am Stat Assoc 77: 320–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson DJ (1990) Time series analysis of Holocene climate data. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond A 330: 601–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. A. Lindsay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindsay, K.A., Rosenberg, J.R. Identification of directed interactions in networks. Biol Cybern 104, 385–396 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-011-0437-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-011-0437-7

Keywords

Navigation