Advertisement

Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 102, Issue 3, pp 197–207 | Cite as

The identification of critical fluctuations and phase transitions in short term and coarse-grained time series—a method for the real-time monitoring of human change processes

  • Günter SchiepekEmail author
  • Guido Strunk
Original Paper

Abstract

We introduce two complementary measures for the identification of critical instabilities and fluctuations in natural time series: the degree of fluctuations F and the distribution parameter D. Both are valid measures even of short and coarse-grained data sets, as demonstrated by artificial data from the logistic map (Feigenbaum-Scenario). A comparison is made with the application of the positive Lyapunov exponent to time series and another recently developed complexity measure—the Permutation Entropy. The results justify the application of the measures within computer-based real-time monitoring systems of human change processes. Results from process-outcome research in psychotherapy and functional neuroimaging of psychotherapy processes are provided as examples for the practical and scientific applications of the proposed measures.

Keywords

Critical fluctuation Distribution of time series data Nonstationarity of processes Phase transitions Real-time monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asay TP, Lambert MJ, Gregersen AT, Goates MK (2002) Using patient-refocused research in evaluating treatment outcome in private practice. J Clin Psychol 58: 1213–1225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. an der Heiden U (1992) Chaos in health and disease—phenomenology and theory. In: Tschacher W, Schiepek G, Brunner EJ (eds) Self-organization and clinical psychology. Springer, Berlin, pp 55–87Google Scholar
  3. Bandt C, Pompe B (2002) Permutation entropy: A natural complexity measure for time series. Phys Rev Lett 88: 174102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eckmann JP, Oliffson Kamphorst S, Ruelle D (1987) Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. Europhys Lett 4: 973–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freeman WJ (2000) Emotion is essential to all intentional behaviors. In: Lewis MD, Granic I (eds) Emotion, development, and self-organisation. Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 209–235Google Scholar
  6. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann RL, Hill CL, Heninger GR, Charney DS (1989) The Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46: 1006–1011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Haken H (1996) Principles of brain functioning. A synergetic approach to brain activity, behavior, and cognition. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Haken H (2002) Brain dynamics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Haken H (2004) Synergetics. Introduction and advanced topics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Haken H, Schiepek G (2006) Synergetik in der Psychologie. Selbstorganisation verstehen und gestalten. Hogrefe, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayes AM, Feldman GC, Beevers CG, Laurenceau JP, Cardaciotto LA, Lewis-Smith J (2007a) Discontinuities and cognitive changes in an exposure-based cognitive therapy for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 75: 409–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayes AM, Laurenceau JP, Feldman GC, Strauss JL, Cardaciotto LA (2007b) Change is not always linear: The study of nonlinear and discontinuous patterns of change in psychotherapy. Clin Psychol Rev 27: 715–723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ilardi SS, Craighead WE (1994) The role of non-specific factors in cognitive-behavior therapy for depression. Clin Psychol Res Pract 1: 138–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kantz, H, Kurths, J, Mayer-Kress, G (eds) (1998) Non-linear analysis of physiological data. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic patterns. The self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Kowalik ZJ, Elbert T (1995) A practical method for the measurements of the chaoticity of electric and magnetic brain activity. Int J Bifurc Chaos 5: 475–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kowalik ZJ, Schiepek G, Kumpf K, Roberts LE, Elbert T (1997) Psychotherapy as a chaotic process II: The application of nonlinear analysis methods on quasi time series of the client-therapist-interaction. A nonstationary approach. Psychother Res 7: 197–218Google Scholar
  18. Kruse, P, Stadler, M (eds) (1995) Ambiguity in mind and nature. Multistable cognitive phenomena. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Smart DW, Vermeersch DA, Nielsen SL, Hawkins EJ (2001) The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced?. Psychother Res 11: 49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (1997/2001) International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Center for research in psychophysiology. University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  21. Nowak A, Vallacher RR (1998) Dynamical social psychology. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Popovych OV, Hauptmann C, Tass PA (2006) Control of neural synchrony by nonlinear delayed feedback. Biol Cybern 95: 69–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenstein MT, Collins JJ, de Luca CJ (1993) A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D 65: 117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schiepek G (2003) A dynamic systems approach to clinical case formulation. Eur J Psychol Assess 19: 175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schiepek G, Kowalik ZJ, Schütz A, Köhler M, Richter K, Strunk G, Mühlnickel W, Elbert T (1997) Psychotherapy as a chaotic process I. Coding the client-therapist-interaction by means of sequential plan analysis and the search for chaos: A stationary approach. Psychother Res 7: 173–194Google Scholar
  26. Schiepek G, Tominschek I, Karch S, Lutz J, Mulert C, Meindl T, Pogarell O (2009) A controlled single case study with repeated fMRI measures during the treatment of a patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Testing the nonlinear dynamics approach to psychotherapy. World J Biol Psychiatry 10: 658–668. doi: 10.1080/15622970802311829 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schiepek G, Perlitz V (2009) Self-organization in clinical psychology. In: Meyer P (eds) Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 7991–8009Google Scholar
  28. Skinner JE, Molnar M, Tomberg C (1994) The point correlation dimension: Performance with nonstationary surrogate data and noise. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 29: 217–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Strunk G (2005) Organisierte Komplexität. Mikroprozess-Analysen der Interaktionsdynamik zweier Psychotherapien mit den Methoden der nichtlinearen Zeitreihenanalyse. Dissertation, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, http://www.opus-bayern.de/uni-bamberg/volltexte/2005/64/
  30. Strunk G, Schiepek G (2006) Systemische Psychologie. Einführung in die komplexen Grundlagen menschlichen Verhaltens. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  31. Tominschek I, Schiepek G, Mehl C, Maier K, Heinzel S, Bauhofer C, Berbic B, Zaudig M (2008) Real-Time Monitoring in der Behandlung von Zwangsstörungen: Technologie und Fallbeispiel. Verhaltenstherapie 18: 146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vetter G, Stadler M, Haynes JD (1997) Phase transitions in learning. J Mind Behav 18: 335–350Google Scholar
  33. Webber CL, Zbilut JP (1994) Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies. J Appl Physiol 76: 965–973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Whipple JL, Lambert MJ, Vermeersch DA, Smart DW, Nielsen SL, Hawkins EJ (2003) Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. J Couns Psychol 50: 59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Synergetics and Psychotherapy ResearchParacelsus Medical University, Universitätsklinikum/Christian Doppler KlinikSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.Research Institute for Health Care Management and EconomicsWU (Vienna University of Economics and Business)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations