Abstract
Insects can remember and return to a place of interest using the surrounding visual cues. In previous experiments, we showed that crickets could home to an invisible cool spot in a hot environment. They did so most effectively with a natural scene surround, though they were also able to home with distinct landmarks or blank walls. Homing was not successful, however, when visual cues were removed through a dark control. Here, we compare six different models of visual homing using the same visual environments. Only models deemed biologically plausible for use by insects were implemented. The average landmark vector model and first order differential optic flow are unable to home better than chance in at least one of the visual environments. Second order differential optic flow and GradDescent on image differences can home better than chance in all visual environments, and best in the natural scene environment, but do not quantitatively match the distributions of the cricket data. Two models—centre of mass average landmark vector and RunDown on image differences—could produce the same pattern of results as observed for crickets. Both the models performed best using simple binary images and were robust to changes in resolution and image smoothing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Binding D, Labrosse F (2006) Visual local navigation using warped panoramic images. In: Proceedings of Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, University of Surrey, Guildford, pp 19–26
Cartwright B, Collett TS (1983) Landmark learning in bees. J Comp Physiol A 151: 521–543. doi:10.1007/BF00605469
Cheung A, Stürzl W, Zeil J, Cheng K (2008) The information content of panoramic images II: view-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 34(1): 15–30. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.15
Collett T, Collett M (2002) Memory use in insect visual navigation. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(7): 542–552. doi:10.1038/nrn872
Franz M, Schölkopf B, Mallot H, Bnlthoff H (1998) Where did I take that snapshot? Scene-based homing by image matching. Biol Cybern 79: 191–202
Fukushi T (2001) Homing in wood ants, Formica japonica: use of the skyline panorama. J Exp Biol 204: 2063–2072
Graham P, Cheng K (2009) Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant? J Comp Physiol A 195(7): 681–689. doi:10.1007/s00359-009-0443-6
Hafner V (2001) Adaptive homing—robotic exploration tours. Adapt Behav 9: 131–141. doi:10.1177/10597123010093002
Labhart T, Hodel B, Valenzuela I (1984) The physiology of the cricket’s compound eye with particular reference to the anatomically specialized dorsal rim area. J Comp Physiol A 155(3): 289–296. doi:10.1007/BF00610582
Labhart T, Petzold J, Helbling H (2001) Spatial integration of polarization-sensitive interneurons of crickets: a survey of evidence, mechanisms and benefits. J Exp Biol 204: 2423–2430
Lambrinos D, Möller R, Labhart T, Pfeifer R, Wehner R (2000) A mobile robot employing insect strategies for navigation. Rob Auton Syst 30: 39–64. doi:10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00064-0
Land M (1997) Visual acuity in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42: 147–177. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.147
Mizunami M, Weibrecht JM, Strausfeld NJ (1998) Mushroom bodies of the cockroach: their participation in place memory. J Comp Neurol 402(4): 520–537. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19981228)402:4<520::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-K
Möller R, Vardy A (2006) Local visual homing matched-filter descent in image distances. Biol Cybern 95: 413–430. doi:10.1007/s00422-006-0095-3
Möller R, Lambrinos D, Roggendorf T, Pfeifer R, Wehner R (2001) Insect strategies of visual homing in mobile robots. Biorobotics—methods and applications. AAAI Press, Cambridge, chap 3, pp 37–66
Möller R, Vardy A, Kreft S, Ruwisch S (2007) Visual homing in environments with anisotropic landmark distribution. Auton Rob 23(1): 231–245. doi:10.1007/s10514-007-9043-x
Morris RG, Garrud P, Rawlins JN, O’Keefe J (1982) Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297(5868): 681–683. doi:10.1038/297681a0
Stürzl W, Cheung A, Cheng K, Zeil J (2008) The information content of panoramic images I: The rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 34(1): 1–14. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.1
Vardy A (2005) Biologically plausible methods for robot visual homing. PhD thesis, Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Computer Science
Vardy A, Möller R (2005) Biologically plausible visual homing methods based on optical flow techniques. Connect Sci Special Issue Navig 17: 47–90. doi:10.1080/09540090500140958
Wehner R (2003) Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A 189(8): 579–588. doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0431-1
Wessnitzer J, Mangan M, Webb B (2008) Place memory in crickets. Proc R Soc B 275: 915–921. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1647
Wystrach A, Beugnon G (2009) Ants learn geometry and features. Curr Biol 19: 61–66. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.054
Zampoglou M, Szenher M, Webb B (2006) Adaptation of controllers for image-based homing. Adapt Behav 14(4): 381–399. doi:10.1177/1059712306072338
Zeil J, Hofmann M, Chahl J (2003) Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes. Opt Soc Am J 20: 450–469. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.20.000450
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mangan, M., Webb, B. Modelling place memory in crickets. Biol Cybern 101, 307–323 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0338-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0338-1