Abstract
An intrinsic property of human motor behavior is a trade-off between speed and accuracy. This is classically described by Fitts’ law, a model derived by assuming that the human body has a limited capacity to transmit information in organizing motor behavior. However, Fitts’ law can also be realized as an emergent property of movements generated by delayed feedback. In this article, we describe the relationship between the Fitts’ law coefficients and the physiological parameters of the underlying delayed feedback circuit: the relaxation rate or time constant, and the psychomotor delay of the feedback process. This relationship is then used to estimate the motor circuit delay of several tasks for which Fitts’ law data are available in the literature. We consistently estimate the delay to be between 0 and 112 ms. A further consequence of this model is that not all combinations of slope and Y-intercept in Fitts’ law are possible when movements are generated by delayed feedback. In fact, it is only possible for an observed speed–accuracy trade-off to be generated by delayed feedback if the Fitts’ law coefficients satisfy −0.482 ≤ a/b ≤ 3.343 [bits] where b represents the slope in bits per second and a represents the Y-intercept in seconds. If we assume human movement is generated by delayed feedback, then the Fitts’ law coefficients should always be restricted to this range of values.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andres RO, Hartung KJ (1989) Predictions of head movement time using Fitts’ law. Hum Factors 31: 703–713
Annett J, Golby CW, Kay H (1958) The measurement of elements in an assembly task: the information output of the human motor system. Q J Exp Psychol 10: 1–11
Barrett NC, Glencross DJ (1989) Response amendments during manual aiming movements to double-step targets. Acta Psychol 70: 205–217
Beamish D, Peskun C, Wu J (2005) Critical delay for overshooting in planned arm movements with delayed feedback. J Math Biol 50(1): 22–48
Beamish D, MacKenzie IS, Wu J (2006) Speed-accuracy trade-off of planned arm movements with delayed feedback. Neural Netw 19: 582–599
Beamish D, Bhatti SA, MacKenzie IS, Wu J (2006) 50 years later: a neurodynamic explanation of Fitts’ law. J Royal Soc Interface 3: 649–654
Beamish D, Bhatti S, Wu J, Jing Z (2008) Performance limitations from delay in human and mechanical motor control. Biol Cybern 99: 43–61
Bullock D, Grossberg S (1988) Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychol Rev 95: 49–90
Burke D, Gracies JM, Mazevet D, Meunier S, Pierrot-Deseilligny E (1994) Non-monosynaptic transmission of the cortical command for voluntary movement in man. J Physiol 480: 191–202
Cabrera JL, Milton JG (2004) Human stick balancing: tuning Levy flights to improve balance control. Chaos 14: 691–698
Cabrera JK, Borman R, Eurich C, Ohira T, Milton JG (2004) State-dependent noise and human balance control. Fluct Noise Lett 4: L107–L117
Cannon DJ (1994) Experiments with a target-threshold control theory model for deriving Fitts’ law parameters for human-machine systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(8): 1089–1098
Carr CE, Konishi M (1988) Axonal delay lines for time measurement in the owl’s brainstem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 831–8315
Cisek P (2001) A computational perspective on proprioception and movement guidance in parietal cortex. In: Nelson R (eds) The somatosensory system: deciphering the brain’s own body image. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 275–297
Connelly EM (1984) A control model: an alternative interpretation of Fitts’ law. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, San Antonio, TX
Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (1999) Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2: 563
Drury CG (1975) Application of Fitts’ law to foot-pedal design. Hum Factors 17: 368–373
Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47: 381–391
Fitts PM (1964) The information capacity of discrete motor responses. J Exp Psychol 67: 103–112
Fitts PM, Radford BK (1966) Information capacity of discrete motor responses under different cognitive sets. J Exp Psychol 71(4): 475–482
Gan K-C, Hoffmann ER (1988) Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements. Ergonomics 31: 829–839
Gawthrop P, Lakie M, Loram I (2007) Predictive feedback control and Fitts’ law. Biol Cybern 98(3): 229–238
Georgopoulos AP (1995) Current issues in directional motor control. Trends Neurosci 18: 506–510
Georgopoulos AP, Schwartz AB, Kettner RE (1986) Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 233: 1416–1419
Glencross D, Barrett N (1983) Programming precision in repetitive tapping. J Mot Behav 15: 191–200
Hollerback JM, Moore SP, Atkeson CG (1986) Workspace effect in arm movement kinematics derived from joint interpolation. In: Gantchev G, Dimitrov G, Gatev P (eds) Motor control. Plenum Press, New York, pp 197–208
Jagacinski RJ, Flach JM (2003) Control theory for humans: quantitative apporaches to modelling performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Keele SW, Posner MI (1968) Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. J Exp Psychol 77: 155–158
Kerr BA (1977) Motor control in aimed movements. In: Christina RW, Langers DM (eds) Psychology of motor behavior and sport, vol. I. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, IL, pp 269–276
Kerr BA, Langolf GD (1977) Speed of aiming movements. Q J Exp Psychol 29: 475–481
Kerr R (1973) Movement time in an underwater environment. J Mot Behav 5: 175–178
Kerr R (1978) Diving, adaptation, and Fitts’ law. J Mot Behav 10: 255–260
Kvalseth TO (1976) Distribution of movement time in a target-aiming task. Percept Mot Ski 43: 507–513
Kvalseth TO (1977) A generalized model of temporal motor control subject to movement constraints. Ergonomics 20: 41–50
Macefield G, Gandevia S (1992) Peripheral and central delays in the cortical projections from the human truncal muscles. Brain 115: 123–135
MacKenzie IS (1989) A note on the information-theoretic basis for Fitts’ law. J Mot Behav 21: 323–330
MacKenzie IS (1991) Fitts law as a performance model in human-computer interaction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto
MacKenzie IS (1992) Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human–computer interaction. Hum Comput Interact 7: 91–139
MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Dugas C, Liske D, Eickmeier B (1987) Three-dimensional movement trajectories in Fitts’ task: implications for control. Q J Exp Psychol 39A: 629–647
Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CI, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Dugas C (1987) Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 41: 365–378
Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JEK (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95(3): 340–370
Miall RC (1996) Task dependent changes in visual feedback control: a frequency analysis of human manual tracking. J Mot Behav 28(2): 125–135
Miall RC, Wolpert DM (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9: 1265–1279
Moreau L, Sontag E (2003) Balancing at the edge of stability. Phys Rev Lett 68: 020901
Phillips CA, Repperger DW (1997) Why engineers should know and use Fitts’ law? In: Proceedings of the annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology, vol 4. Wright State University, Dayton, pp 1686–1689
Sabatini BL, Reghr WG (1996) Timing of neurotransmission at fast synapses in the mammalian brain. Nature 384: 170–172
Soukoreff RW, MacKenzie IS (2004) Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation: perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. Int J Hum Comput Stud 61: 751–789
Stratford KJ, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Martin KAC, Bannister NJ, Jack JJB (1996) Excitatory synaptic inputs to spiny stellate cells in cat visual cortex. Nature 382: 258–261
Sugden DA (1980) Movement speed in children. J Mot Behav 12: 125–132
Tunik E, Frey SH, Grafton ST (2005) Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat Neurosci 8: 505–511
Venkadesan M, Guckenheimer J, Valero-Cuevas FJ (2007) Manipulating the edge of instability. J Biomech 40(8): 1653–1661
Vetter P, Wolpert DM (2000) Context estimation for sensorimotor control. J Neurophysiol 84: 1026–1034
Welford AT (1968) Fundamentals of skill. Methuen, London
Winstein CJ, Grafton ST, Pohl PS (1997) Motor task difficulty and brain activity: investigation of goal-directed reciprocal aiming using positron emission tomography. J Neurophysiol 70(3): 1581–1594
Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev 3:1–119 (monograph supplement)
Wu J (2001) Introduction to neural dynamics and signal transmission delay. De Gruyter series in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 6. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin
Zelaznik HN, Hawkings B, Kisselburgh L (1983) Rapid visual feedback processing in single aiming movements. J Mot Behav 15: 217–236
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
The Below is the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beamish, D., Bhatti, S., Chubbs, C.S. et al. Estimation of psychomotor delay from the Fitts’ law coefficients. Biol Cybern 101, 279–296 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0336-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0336-3