Abstract
This work reports an empirical examination of two key issues in theoretical neuroscience: distractibility in the context of working memory (WM) and its reward dependence. While these issues have been examined fruitfully in isolation (e.g. Macoveanu et al. in Biol Cybern 96(4): 407–19, 2007), we address them here in tandem, with a focus on how distractibility and reward interact. In particular, we parameterise an observation model that embodies the nonlinear form of such interactions, as described in a recent neuronal network model (Gruber et al. in J Comput Neurosci 20:153–166, 2006). We observe that memory for a target stimulus can be corrupted by distracters in the delay period. Interestingly, in contrast to our theoretical predictions, this corruption was only partial. Distracters do not simply overwrite target; rather, a compromise is reached between target and distracter. Finally, we observed a trend towards a reduced distractibility under conditions of high reward. We discuss the implications of these findings for theoretical formulations of basal and dopamine (DA)-modulated neural bump- attractor networks of working memory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley AD and Hitch G (1974). Working memory. In: Bower, GH (eds) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, vol 8, pp 47–89. Academic, New York,
Baddeley AD (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 417–423
Brody CD, Romo R and Kepecs (2003). Basic mechanisms for graded persistent activity: discrete attractors, continuous attractors, and dynamic representations. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13: 204–211
Fougnie D and Marois R (2006). Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms. Psychol Sci 17(6): 526–534
Gruber AJ, Solla SA, Surmeier DJ and Houk JC (2003). Modulation of striatal single units by expected reward: a spiny neuron model displaying dopamine-induced bistability. J Neurophysiol 90(2): 1095–1114
Gruber AJ, Dayan P, Gutkin BS and Solla SA (2006). Dopamine modulation in the basal ganglia locks the gate on working memory. J Comput Neurosci 20: 153–166
Jacobsen LK, Pugh KR, Mencl WE, Gelernter J (2006) C957T polymorphism of the dopamine D2 receptor gene modulates the effect of nicotine on working memory performance and cortical processing efficiency. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 188:530–540
Kalivas PW, Jackson D, Romanidies A, Wyndham L and Duffy P (2001). Involvement of pallidothalamic circuitry in working memory. Neuroscience 104(1): 129–136
Kermadi I and Joseph JP (1995). Activity in the caudate nucleus of monkey during spatial sequencing. J Neurophysiol 74(3): 911–933
Lewis SJ, Dove A, Robbins TW, Barker RA and Owen AM (2004). Striatal contributions to working memory: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans. Eur J Neurosci 19(3): 755–760
Lynd-Balta E and Haber SN (1994). The organization of midbrain projections to the striatum in the primate: sensorimotor-related striatum versus ventral striatum. Neuroscience 59(3): 625–640
Machens CK, Romo R and Brody CD (2005). Flexible control of mutual inhibition: a neural model of two-interval discrimination. Science 307(5712): 1121–1124
Macoveanu J, Klingberg T, TegnéJ (2007) Neuronal firing rates account for distractor effects on mnemonic accuracy in a visuo-spatial working memory task. Biol Cybern 96(4):407–419. Epub 27 Jan 2007
Miyoshi E, Wietzikoski S, Camplessei M, Silveira R, Takahashi RN and Da Cunha C (2002). Impaired learning in a spatial working memory version and in a cued version of the water maze in rats with MPTP-induced mesencephalic dopaminergic lesions. Brain Res Bull 58(7): 41–47
Muller U, Cramon DY and von Pollmann S (1998). Dl- versus D2-receptor modulation of visuospatial working memory in humans. J Neurosci 18(7): 2720–2728
Nicola SM, Surmeier DJ and Malenka RC (2000). Dopaminergicmodulation of neuronal excitability in the striatum and nucleus accumbens. Annu Rev Neurosci 23: 185–215
Owen AM (2004) Working memory: imaging the magic number four. Curr Biol 14(14):R573–R574 (Review)
Renart A, Song P and Wang XJ (2003). Robust spatial working memory through homeostatic synaptic scaling in heterogeneous cortical networks. Neuron 38(3): 473–485
Tsodyks M and Sejnowski T (1995). Associative memory and hippocampal place cells. Int J Neural Syst 6(supp. 1995): 81–86
Williams GV and Goldman-Rakic PS (1995). Modulation of memory fields by dopamine D1 receptors in prefrontal cortex. Nature 376: 572–575
Zhang K (1996). Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory. J Neurosci 16(6): 2112–2126
Zahrt J, Taylor JR, Mathew RG and Arnsten AF (1997). Supranormal stimulation of D1 dopamine receptors in the rodent prefrontal cortex impairs spatial working memory performance. J Neurosci 17(21): 8528–8535
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chumbley, J.R., Dolan, R.J. & Friston, K.J. Attractor models of working memory and their modulation by reward. Biol Cybern 98, 11–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0202-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0202-0