Abstract
Purpose
The purpose was to examine the effects of 8-weeks (3 days/week) of linear periodization resistance exercise training (RET) on neuromuscular function in prepubescent youth.
Methods
Twenty-five healthy prepubescent youth (11 males, 14 females, age = 9.1 ± 0.8 years) completed the RET (n = 17) or served as controls (CON, n = 8). Isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) and trapezoidal submaximal contractions at 35 and 60% MVC of the right leg extensors were performed with surface electromyography (EMG) recorded from the leg extensors [vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris, and vastus medialis] and flexors (biceps femoris and semitendinosus). EMG amplitude of the leg extensors and flexors were calculated during the MVCs. Motor unit (MU) action potential trains were decomposed from the surface EMG of the VL for the 35 and 60% MVCs. MU firing rates and action potential amplitudes were regressed against recruitment threshold with the y-intercepts and slopes calculated for each contraction. Total leg extensor muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was collected using ultrasound images. ANOVA models were used to examine potential differences.
Results
Isometric strength increased post-RET (P = 0.006) with no changes in leg extensor and flexor EMG amplitude. Furthermore, there were no changes in total CSA or the MU action potential amplitude vs. recruitment threshold relationships. However, there were increases in the firing rates of the higher-threshold MUs post-RET as indicated with greater y-intercepts (P = 0.003) from the 60% MVC and less negative slope (P = 0.004) of the firing rates vs. recruitment threshold relationships at 35% MVC.
Conclusions
MU adaptations contribute to strength increases following RET in prepubescent youth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data is available upon a resonable request.
Abbreviations
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- ASIS:
-
Anterior superior iliac spine
- BF:
-
Biceps femoris
- CON:
-
Control
- CSA:
-
Cross-sectional area
- d :
-
Cohn’s d
- EMG:
-
Electromyography
- ES:
-
Effect size
- ITT:
-
Interpolated twitch technique
- MFR:
-
Mean firing rate
- MVC:
-
Maximal voluntary contraction
- MU:
-
Motor unit
- MUAPAMPS :
-
Motor unit action potential amplitudes
- η p 2 :
-
Partial eta-squared
- PD:
-
Precision decomposition
- RET:
-
Resistance exercise training
- RF:
-
Rectus femoris
- RT:
-
Recruitment threshold
- ST:
-
Semitendinosus
- STA:
-
Spike trigger averaging
- sFAT:
-
Subcutaneous fat
- VL:
-
Vastus lateralis
- VM:
-
Vastus medialis
References
Beck TW (2013) The importance of a priori sample size estimation in strength and conditioning research. J Strength Cond Res 27:2323–2337. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318278eea0
Beck TW, DeFreitas JM, Stock MS (2011) The effects of a resistance training program on average motor unit firing rates. Clin Kinesiol 65:9
Behm DG, Faigenbaum AD, Falk B, Klentrou P (2008) Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology position paper: resistance training in children and adolescents. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 33:547–561. https://doi.org/10.1139/H08-020
Behringer M, Matthews M, Mester J (2011) Effects of strength training on motor performance skills in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Exerc Sci 23:21
Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S et al (2020) World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 54:1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
Burke RE, Rudomin P, Zajac FE (1970) Catch property in single mammalian motor units. Science 168:122–124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.168.3927.122
Button DC, Behm DG (2008) The effect of stimulus anticipation on the interpolated twitch technique. J Sports Sci Med 7:520–524
Chang S-S, De Luca C, Nawab H (2008) Aliasing rejection in precision decomposition of EMG signals. In: 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. pp 4972–4975
De Luca CJ, Adam A, Wotiz R et al (2006) Decomposition of surface EMG signals. J Neurophysiol 96:1646–1657. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00009.2006
DeFronzo RA, Jacot E, Jequier E et al (1981) The effect of insulin on the disposal of intravenous glucose. Results from indirect calorimetry and hepatic and femoral venous catheterization. Diabetes 30:1000–1007. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.30.12.1000
Dotan R, Mitchell C, Cohen R et al (2012) Child—Adult differences in muscle activation—a review. Pediatr Exerc Sci 24:2–21. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.24.1.2
Enoka RM, Duchateau J (2017) Rate coding and the control of muscle force. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 7:a029702. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a029702
Faigenbaum AD, Kraemer WJ, Blimkie CJR et al (2009) Youth resistance training: updated position statement paper from the national strength and conditioning association. J Strength Cond Res 23:S60-79. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31819df407
Falk B (2015) Resistance training in children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 27:13–17
Farina D, Enoka RM (2011) Surface EMG decomposition requires an appropriate validation. J Neurophysiol 105:981–982; author reply 983–984. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00855.2010
Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM (2014) The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update. J Appl Physiol 117:1215–1230. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00162.2014
Fuglevand AJ, Lester RA, Johns RK (2015) Distinguishing intrinsic from extrinsic factors underlying firing rate saturation in human motor units. J Neurophysiol 113:1310–1322. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00777.2014
Fukunaga T, Funato K, Ikegawa S (1992) The effects of resistance training on muscle area and strength in prepubescent age. Ann Physiol Anthropol Seiri Jinruigaku Kenkyukai Kaishi 11:357–364. https://doi.org/10.2114/ahs1983.11.357
Gillen ZM, Housh TJ, Schmidt RJ et al (2021) Comparisons of muscle strength, size, and voluntary activation in pre- and post-pubescent males and females. Eur J Appl Physiol 121:2487–2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04717-1
Herbert RD, Gandevia SC (1999) Twitch interpolation in human muscles: mechanisms and implications for measurement of voluntary activation. J Neurophysiol 82:2271–2283. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2271
Herda TJ (2022) Resistance exercise training and the motor unit. Eur J Appl Physiol 122:2019–2035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04983-7
Herda TJ, Ryan ED, Kohlmeier M et al (2018) Examination of muscle morphology and neuromuscular function in normal weight and overfat children aged 7–10 years. Scand J Med Sci Sports 28:2310–2321. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13256
Herda TJ, Gallagher P, Miller J et al (2020a) Skeletal muscle composition and glucose levels in children who are overweight and obese. Pediatr Exerc Sci 32:157–164
Herda TJ, Parra ME, Miller JD et al (2020b) Measuring the accuracies of motor unit firing times and action potential waveforms derived from surface electromyographic decomposition. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 52:102421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102421
Hernandez-Sarabia JA, Luera MJ, Barrera-Curiel A et al (2020) Does strict validation criteria for individual motor units alter population-based regression models of the motor unit pool? Exp Brain Res 238:2475–2485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05906-8
Hu X, Rymer WZ, Suresh NL (2013) Motor unit pool organization examined via spike-triggered averaging of the surface electromyogram. J Neurophysiol 110:1205–1220. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00301.2012
Hu X, Rymer WZ, Suresh NL (2014) Control of motor unit firing during step-like increases in voluntary force. Front Hum Neurosci 8:721
Jenkins NDM, Rogers EM, Banks NF et al (2020) Increases in motor unit action potential amplitudes are related to muscle hypertrophy following eight weeks of high-intensity exercise training in females. Eur J Sport Sci 21:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1836262
Kamen G, Knight CA (2004) Training-related adaptations in motor unit discharge rate in young and older adults. J Gerontol Ser A 59:1334–1338. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/59.12.1334
Legerlotz K, Marzilger R, Bohm S, Arampatzis A (2016) Physiological adaptations following resistance training in youth athletes—a narrative review. Pediatr Exerc Sci 28:501–520. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2016-0023
Martinez-Valdes E, Negro F, Falla D et al (2018) Surface electromyographic amplitude does not identify differences in neural drive to synergistic muscles. J Appl Physiol 124:1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01115.2017
McManus L, Hu X, Rymer WZ et al (2016) Muscle fatigue increases beta-band coherence between the firing times of simultaneously active motor units in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. J Neurophysiol 115:2830–2839. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00097.2016
Miller JD, Lippman JD, Trevino MA, Herda TJ (2020) Neural drive is greater for a high-intensity contraction than for moderate-intensity contractions performed to fatigue. J Strength Cond Res 34:3013–3021. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003694
Moore SA, McKay HA, Macdonald H et al (2015) Enhancing a somatic maturity prediction model. Med Sci Sports Exerc 47:1755–1764. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000588
Nawab SH, Chang SS, De Luca CJ (2010) High-yield decomposition of surface EMG signals. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1602–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.092
Ozmun JC, Mikesky AE, Surburg PR (1994) Neuromuscular adaptations following prepubescent strength training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26:510–514
Parra ME, Miller JD, Sterczala AJ et al (2020) Differences in the firing rate versus recruitment threshold relationships of the vastus lateralis in children ages 7–10 years and adults. Hum Mov Sci 72:102650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2020.102650
Parra ME, Miller JD, Sterczala AJ et al (2021) The reliability of the slopes and y-intercepts of the motor unit firing times and action potential waveforms versus recruitment threshold relationships derived from surface electromyography signal decomposition. Eur J Appl Physiol 121:3389–3398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04790-6
Patten C, Kamen G (2000) Adaptations in motor unit discharge activity with force control training in young and older human adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 83:128–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210000271
Payne VG, Morrow JR, Johnson L, Dalton SN (1997) Resistance training in children and youth: a meta-analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport 68:80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1997.10608869
Pope ZK, Hester GM, Benik FM, DeFreitas JM (2016) Action potential amplitude as a noninvasive indicator of motor unit-specific hypertrophy. J Neurophysiol 115:2608–2614. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00039.2016
Ramsay JA, Blimkie CJ, Smith K et al (1990) Strength training effects in prepubescent boys. Med Sci Sports Exerc 22:605–614
Sterczala AJ, Miller JD, Dimmick HL et al (2020) Eight weeks of resistance training increases strength, muscle cross-sectional area and motor unit size, but does not alter firing rates in the vastus lateralis. Eur J Appl Physiol 120:281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04273-9
Stock MS, Thompson BJ (2014) Effects of barbell deadlift training on submaximal motor unit firing rates for the vastus lateralis and rectus femoris. PLoS ONE 9:e115567. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115567
Stricker PR, Faigenbaum AD, McCambridge TM, Fitness C on SMA (2020) Resistance training for children and adolescents. Pediatrics 145: e20201011. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1011
Thompson CK, Negro F, Johnson MD et al (2018) Robust and accurate decoding of motoneuron behaviour and prediction of the resulting force output. J Physiol 596:2643–2659. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP276153
Woods S, O’Mahoney C, Maynard J et al (2022) Increase in volitional muscle activation from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 54:789–799. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002853
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge all children and parents for their time commitment to this study.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Strength and Conditioning Association Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TH conceived and designed research. TH, EH, CC, KM, and AH conducted experiments. JT, RS, CC, and AH assisted in the development of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work. There was no funding for this paper.
Additional information
Communicated by Andrew Cresswell.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Herda, T.J., Holmes, E.A., Cleary, C.J. et al. Motor unit firing rates increase in prepubescent youth following linear periodization resistance exercise training. Eur J Appl Physiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05455-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05455-w