Skip to main content
Log in

Coupling of \({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\) and \({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\) kinetics: insights from multiple exercise transitions below the estimated lactate threshold

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During a step-change in exercise power output (PO), ventilation (\({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\)) increases with a similar time course to the rate of carbon dioxide delivery to the lungs (\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\)). To test the strength of this coupling, we compared \({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\) and \({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\) kinetics from ten independent exercise transitions performed within the moderate-intensity domain. Thirteen males completed 3–5 repetitions of ∆40 W step transitions initiated from 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 W on a cycle ergometer. Preceding the ∆40 W step transitions from 60, 80, 100, and 120 W was a 6 min bout of 20 W cycling from which the transitions of variable ∆PO were examined. Gas exchange (\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\) and oxygen uptake, \({\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{2}\)) and \({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\) were measured by mass spectrometry and volume turbine. The kinetics of the responses were characterized by the time constant (τ) and amplitude (Δ\({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\)\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\)). Overall, \({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\) kinetics were consistently slower than \({\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{2}\) kinetics (by ~ 45%) and τ\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\) rose progressively with increasing baseline PO and with heightened ∆PO from a common baseline. Compared to τ\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\), τ\({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\) was on average slightly greater (by ~ 4 s). Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed that there was no interaction between τ\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\) and τ\({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\) in either the variable baseline (p = 0.49) and constant baseline (p = 0.56) conditions indicating that each changed in unison. Additionally, for Δ\({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\)\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\), there was no effect of either variable baseline PO (p = 0.05) or increasing ΔPO (p = 0.16). These data provide further evidence that, within the moderate-intensity domain, both the temporal- and amplitude-based characteristics of V̇E kinetics are inextricably linked to those of \({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

Amplitude

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

Bf:

Breathing frequency

BSL:

Baseline

CI95 :

95% Confidence interval

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

G:

Gain

HSD:

Honest significant difference

θ LT :

Estimated lactate threshold

O2 :

Oxygen

PaCO2 :

Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide

PCO2 :

Partial pressure of carbon dioxide

PCr:

Phosphocreatine

PO:

Power output

PO2 :

Partial pressure of oxygen

POpeak :

Peak power output

RER:

Respiratory exchange ratio

RI:

Ramp incremental

SD:

Standard deviation

SS:

Steady state

τ :

Time constant

TD:

Time delay

\({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{A}}}\) :

Alveolar ventilation

\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\) :

Rate of carbon dioxide output

\({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\) :

Ventilation

\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{2}\) :

Rate of oxygen uptake

\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{2}\) peak :

Peak rate of oxygen uptake

VT :

Tidal volume

χ 2 :

Chi-squared analysis

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the participants in this study. We also extend our gratitude to Professor P.A. Robbins, University of Oxford, for providing the “End-tidal Forcing” software for breath-by-breath pulmonary oxygen uptake measurement.

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) research and equipment grants (RGPIN-2015-00084). Daniel A. Keir was supported by a NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2021-03980). Alexandra M. M. Ward was supported by an NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Award. Nasimi A. Guluzade was supported by an NSERC CGS-M Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DAK and JMK: contributed to the conception and design of the experiments. DAK: collected the data. AMMW, NAG, and DAK: analyzed and interpreted data and drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to interpretation of data and drafting and revising of the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel A. Keir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Guido Ferretti.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1002 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ward, A.M.M., Guluzade, N.A., Kowalchuk, J.M. et al. Coupling of \({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\) and \({\dot{\text{V}}\text{CO}}_{2}\) kinetics: insights from multiple exercise transitions below the estimated lactate threshold. Eur J Appl Physiol 123, 509–522 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-05073-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-05073-4

Keywords

Navigation