Abstract
Purpose
A square-wave verification bout to confirm maximal oxygen uptake (\(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2max) from a graded exercise test (GXT) has been recommended. This study ascertained if a verification bout is necessary to determine \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2max in moderately trained men.
Methods
Ten men (24 ± 4 years) completed familiarization and two treadmill GXTs, followed by a submaximal verification bout to determine \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2GXT and \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2verification (highest \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2 from each testing method). After completing the GXT, subjects rested for 5 min then performed a verification bout at 90% speed and 50% incline at termination of the GXT. The analyses included a 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), standard errors of the measurement (SEM), minimal differences (MD), and coefficients of variation (CoV).
Results
There was no test (test 1 vs test 2) × method (GXT vs verification) interaction (p = 0.584), or main effect for test (p = 0.320), but there was a main effect for method (p = 0.011). The \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2GXT (50.9±3.0 mL·kg−1·min−1) was greater than \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2verification (46.9 ± mL·kg−1·min−1). The \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2GXT (ICC = 0.988, SEM = 1.0 mL·kg−1 min−1, MD = 2.9 mL kg−1 min−1, CoV = 2.03%) and \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2verification (ICC = 0.976, SEM = 1.0 mL·kg−1 min−1, MD = 2.7 mL·kg−1·min−1, CoV = 2.03%) demonstrated “excellent” reliability. No subject exceeded the MD for \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2GXT test–retest or for \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2verification test–retest, but 50% of subjects had a \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2GXT that was greater than the \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2verification (> MD).
Conclusion
While \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2GXT and \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2verification demonstrated excellent reliability, \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2GXT from a stand-alone GXT provided higher estimates of \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2 and, therefore, should be considered \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2max. The lack of test–retest differences in \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2GXT above the MD indicated that subjects achieved their highest \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2 (\(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2max) from a standalone GXT. Therefore, the verification bout may not be required to confirm \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2max in this population.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CoV:
-
Coefficient of variation
- CRF:
-
Cardiorespiratory fitness
- CVD:
-
Cardiovascular disease
- GXT:
-
Graded exercise test
- ICC:
-
Intraclass correlation coefficient
- k :
-
Number of tests
- n :
-
Sample size
- \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2GXT :
-
Maximal \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2 from the GXT
- \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2verification :
-
Maximal \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2 from the verification bout
- \(\dot{\mathrm{V}}\)O2max :
-
Maximal volume of oxygen uptake
- MSS :
-
Mean square error of the between subjects-effects
- MSE :
-
Mean square error of the within subjects-effects
- MST :
-
Mean square factor of the within subjects-effects
- MD:
-
Minimal difference to be considered real
- SEM:
-
Standard error of the measure
References
Astorino TA, DeRevere J (2018) Efficacy of constant load verification testing to confirm VO2max attainment. Clin Phsiol Funct Imaging 38(4):703–709
Astrand PO (1952) Experimental studies of physical working capacity in relation to sex and age. Munksgaard, Copenhagen
Atkinson G, Nevill AM (1998) Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26(4):217–238
Beltz NM, Gibson AL, Janot JM, Kravitz L, Mermier CM, Dalleck LC (2016) Graded exercise testing protocols for the determination of VO2max: historical perspectives, progress, and future considerations. J Sports Med 2016:1–12
Buchfuhrer MJ, Hansen JE, Robinson TE, Sue DY, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ (1983) Optimizing the exercise protocol for cardiopulmonary assessment. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 55(5):1558–1564
Buckthrope MW, Hannah R, Pain TG, Folland JP (2012) Reliability of neuromuscular measurements during explosive isometric contractions, with special reference to electromyography normalization techniques. Muscle Nerve 46(4):566–576
Chidnok W, DiMenna FJ, Bailey SJ et al (2013) VO2max is not altered by self-pacing during incremental exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 113(2):529–539
Costa VAB, Midgley AW, Carroll S et al (2021) Is a verification phase useful for confirming maximal oxygen uptake in apparently healthy adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 16(2):e0247057
Czuba M, Zajac A, Cholewa J, Poprzecki S, Roczniok R (2010) Difference in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) determined by incremental and ramp tests. Phys Cult Sport Stud Res 17(2):123–127
Dalleck LC, Astorino TA, Erickson RM, McCarthy CM, Beadell AA, Botten BH (2012) Suitability of verification testing to confirm attainment of VO2max in middle-aged and older adults. Res Sports Med 20(2):118–128
Day JR, Rossiter HB, Coats EM, Skasick A, Whipp BJ (2003) The maximally attainable VO2 during exercise in humans: the peak vs. maximum issue. J Appl Physiol 95(5):1901–1907
Ekblom-Bak E, Ekblom B, Soderling J et al (2019) Sex- and age-specific associations between cardiorespiratory fitness, CVD morbidity and all-cause mortality in 266109 adults. Prev Med 127:105799
Green S (2002) Haemodynamic limitations and exercise performance in peripheral artery disease. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 22(2):81–91
Green S, Askew C (2018) VO2peak is an acceptable estimate of fitness but not VO2max. J Appl Physiol 125:229–232
Hill AV, Lupton H (1923) Muscular exercise, lactic acid and the supply and utilization of oxygen. Q J Med 16:135–171
Hopkins WG (2000) Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 30(1):1–15
Kirkeberg JM, Dalleck LC, Kamphoff CS, Pettitt RW (2010) Validity of 3 protocols for verifying VO2max. Int J Sports Med 32(4):266–270
Liguori G, Feito Y, Fountaine C, Roy BA (2022) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia
Midgley AW, Carroll S (2009) Emergence of the verification phase procedure for confirming ‘true’VO2max. Scand J Med Sci Sports 19(3):313–322
Midgley AW, McNaughton LR, Carroll S (2006) Verification phase as a useful tool in the determination of the maximal oxygen uptake of distance runners. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 31(5):541–548
Myers J, Bellin D (2000) Ramp exercise protocols for clinical and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. J Sports Med 30(1):23–29
Niemela K, Palatsi I, Linnaluoto M, Takkunen J (1980) Criteria for maximum oxygen uptake in progressive bicycle tests. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 44(1):51–59
Noakes TD (2008) Maximal oxygen uptake as a parametric measure of cardiorespiratory capacity: comment. Med Sci Sport Exerc 40(3):585–586
Nolan PB, Beaven ML, Dalleck L (2014) Comparison of intensities and rest periods for VO2max verification and testing procedures. Int J Sports Med 35(12):1024–1029
Poole DC, Jones AM (2017) Measurement of the maximum oxygen uptake VO2max: VO2peak is no longer acceptable. J Appl Physiol 122(4):997–1002
Poole DC, Wilkerson DP, Jones AM (2008) Validity of criteria for establishing maximal O2 uptake during ramp exercise tests. Eur J Appl Physiol 102(4):403–410
Robergs RA, Dwyer D, Astorino T (2010) Recommendations for improved data processing from expired gas analysis indirect calorimetry. Sports Med 40(2):95–111
Rossiter HB, Kowalchuk JM, Whipp BJ (2005) A test to establish O2 uptake despite no plateau in the O2 uptake response to ramp incremental exercise. J Appl Physiol 100:764–770
Sawyer BJ, McMahon N, Thornhill KL et al (2020) (2020) Supra-versus submaximal cycle ergometry verification of VO2max in males and females. Sports 8(12):163
Sedgeman D, Dalleck L, Clark IE, Jamnick N, Pettitt RW (2013) Analysis of square-wave bouts to verify VO2max. Int J Sports Med 34(12):1058–1062
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–248
Succi PJ, Dinyer TK, Byrd MT, Soucie EP, Voskuil CC, Bergstrom HC (2021) Test-retest reliability of critical power, critical heart rate, time to exhaustion, and average heart rate during cycle ergometry. J Exerc Physiol Online 24(2):33–52
Taylor HL, Buskirk E, Henschel A (1955) Maximal oxygen intake as an objective measure of cardio-respiratory performance. J Appl Physiol 8(1):73–80
Thoden JS, MacDougall JD, Wilson BA (1982) Testing aerobic power. In: MacDougall JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ (eds) Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete. Movement Publications, Ithaca, pp 39–54
Vincent WJ, Weir JP (2012) Statistics in kinesiology. Human Kinetics, Champaign
Weatherwax R, Harris N, Kilding AE, Dalleck L (2019) Time course changes in confirmed ‘true’VO2max after individualized and standardized training. Sports Med Int Open 3(2):E32–E39
Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19(1):231–240
Zuniga JM, Housh TJ, Camic CL et al (2012) Metabolic parameters for ramp versus step incremental cycle ergometer tests. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 37(6):1110–1117
Zuniga JM, Housh TJ, Camic CL et al (2013) Neuromuscular and metabolic comparisons between ramp and step incremental cycle ergometer tests. Muscle Nerve 47(4):555–560
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the University’s Departmental Student Research Award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Additional information
Communicated by Susan Hopkins.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Succi, P.J., Benitez, B., Kwak, M. et al. Methodological considerations for the determination of VO2max in healthy men. Eur J Appl Physiol 123, 191–199 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-05033-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-05033-y