Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of protocol on peak power output in continuous incremental cycle exercise tests

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 February 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

Peak power output (\({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak) in an incremental exercise test (EXT) is considered an important predictor of performance for cyclists. However, \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak is protocol dependent. The purpose of this study was to model the effect of EXT design on \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak.

Methods

An adapted version of a previously developed mathematical model was used. For the purpose of validity testing, we compared predicted \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak differences (predicted Δ\({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak) with actual Δ\({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak found in sports science literature.

Results

The model quantified Δ\({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak between 36 EXT designs with stage durations in the range 1–5 min and increments in the range 10–50 W. Predicted Δ\({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak and actual Δ\({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak across a wide range of performance levels of cyclists were in good agreement. Depending on the specific combination of increment and stage duration, \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak may be widely different or equivalent. A minimum difference in increment (5 W) or in stage duration (1 min) already results in significantly different \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak. In EXTs having the same ratio between increment and stage duration, \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak in the EXT with the shortest stage duration or the greatest increment is significantly higher. Tests combining 15 W, 25 W or 40 W increments with 2, 3 and 4 min stage durations, respectively, are ‘special’ in that their \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak approximates the power output associated with maximal oxygen uptake (\({\text{P}}-{\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{2} \max\)).

Conclusions

The modeling results allow comparison of \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak between widely different EXT designs. Absolute performance level does not affect Δ\({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak. \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak15/2, \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak25/3 and \({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak40/4 constitute a practical physiologic reference for performance diagnostics and exercise intensity prescription.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Change history

Abbreviations

EXT:

Incremental exercise test

HRR:

Heart rate reserve (difference between maximal heart rate and resting heart rate)

MMPt:

Maximum mean power for a duration of t min

\({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)peak:

Peak power output in an EXT

\({\text{P}} - {\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{2} \max\) :

Power output associated with maximal oxygen uptake

SED :

Standard error of the difference between two randomly drawn sample means

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

SD:

Stage duration in an EXT

Tlim:

Time until task failure in a constant work rate test

\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{2} {\text{max}}\) :

Maximal oxygen uptake

\({\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{2} {\text{R}}\) :

VO2 reserve (difference between maximal oxygen uptake and resting oxygen uptake)

\({\dot{{\rm W}}} \)completed:

Work rate for the highest fully completed work stage in an EXT

References

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HL invented the modeling principles, carried out the calculations, made the figures and wrote the first draft manuscript. AJ reviewed and commented on all previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Luttikholt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by Andrew Cresswell.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luttikholt, H., Jones, A.M. Effect of protocol on peak power output in continuous incremental cycle exercise tests. Eur J Appl Physiol 122, 757–768 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04880-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04880-5

Keywords

Navigation