Skip to main content
Log in

Running at altitude: the 100-m dash

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Theoretical 100-m performance times (t100-m) of a top athlete at Mexico-City (2250 m a.s.l.), Alto-Irpavi (Bolivia) (3340 m a.s.l.) and in a science-fiction scenario “in vacuo” were estimated assuming that at the onset of the run: (i) the velocity (v) increases exponentially with time; hence (ii) the forward acceleration (af) decreases linearly with v, iii) its time constant (τ) being the ratio between vmax (for af = 0) and af max (for v = 0).

Methods

The overall forward force per unit of mass (Ftot), sum of af and of the air resistance (Fa = k v2, where k = 0.0037 J·s2·kg−1·m−3), was estimated from the relationship between af and v during Usain Bolt’s extant world record. Assuming that Ftot is unchanged since the decrease of k at altitude is known, the relationships between af and v were obtained subtracting the appropriate Fa values from Ftot, thus allowing us to estimate in the three conditions considered vmax, τ, and t100-m. These were also obtained from the relationship between mechanical power and speed, assuming an unchanged mechanical power at the end of the run (when af ≈ 0), regardless of altitude.

Results

The resulting t100-m amounted to 9.515, 9.474, and 9.114 s, and to 9.474, 9.410, and 8.981 s, respectively, as compared to 9.612 s at sea level.

Conclusions

Neglecting science-fiction scenarios, t100-m of a world-class athlete can be expected to undergo a reduction of 1.01 to 1.44% at Mexico-City and of 1.44 to 2.10%, at Alto-Irpavi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arsac LM (2002) Effects of altitude on the energetics of human best performances in 100-m running: a theoretical analysis. Eur J Appl Physiol 87:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsac LM, Locatelli E (2002) Modelling the energetics of 100-m running by using speed curves of world champions. J Appl Physiol 92:1781–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brocherie F, Millet GP, Morin JB, Girard O (2016) Mechanical alterations to repeated treadmill sprints in normobaric hypoxia. Med Sci Sports Exerc 48:1570–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavagna GA, Kaneko M (1977) Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running. J Physiol 268:467–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavagna GA, Saibene FP, Margaria R (1964) Mechanical work in running. J Appl Physiol 19:249–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavagna GA, Komarek L, Mazzoleni S (1971) The mechanics of sprint running. J Physiol 217:709–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chelly SM, Denis C (2001) Leg power and hopping stiffness: relationship with sprint running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:326–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Del Vecchio A, Negro F, Holobar A, Casolo A, Folland JP, Felici F, Farina D (2019) You are as fast as your motor neurons: speed of recruitment and maximal discharge of motor neurons determine the maximal rate of force development in humans. J Physiol 597:2445–2456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • di Prampero PE, Capelli C, Pagliaro P, Antonutto G, Girardis M, Zamparo P, Soule RG (1993) Energetics of best performances in middle-distance running. J Appl Physiol 74:2318–2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • di Prampero PE, Fusi S, Sepulcri L, Morin JB, Belli A, Antonutto G (2005) Sprint running: a new energetic approach. J Exp Biol 208:2809–2816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenn WO (1930a) Frictional and kinetic factors in the work of sprint running. Am J Physiol 92:583–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenn WO (1930b) Work against gravity and work due to velocity changes in running. Am J Physiol 93:433–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard O, Brocherie F, Millet GP (2017) Effects of altitude/hypoxia on single-and multiple-sprint performance: a comprehensive review. Sports Med 47:1931–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graubner R, Nixdorf E (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the sprint and hurdles events at the 2009 IAAF World Championships in athletics. New Stud Athl 26:19–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry FM (1954) Time-velocity equations and oxygen requirements of ‘all-out’ and ‘steady-pace’ running. Res Q Exerc Sport 25:167–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting UG (1999) Biomechanical analysis of the sprinting events. In: Brüggemann GP, Koszewski D, Müller H (eds) Biomechanical Research Project Athens 1997 - Final Report. Meyer & Meyer Sport, Okford (UK), pp 12–81

  • Mero A, Komi PV, Gregor RJ (1992) Biomechanics of sprint running. A review. Sports Med 13:376–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti AE (1998) A model equation for the prediction of mechanical internal work of terrestrial locomotion. J Biomech 31:463–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morin JB, Jeannin T, Chevallier B, Belli A (2006) Spring-mass model characteristics during sprint running: correlation with performance and fatigue-induced changes. Int J Sports Med 27:158–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murase Y, Hoshikawa T, Yasuda N, Ikegami Y, Matsui H (1976) Analysis of the changes in progressive speed during 100-meter dash. In: Komi PV (ed) Biomechanics V-B. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 200–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavei G, Zamparo P, Fujii N, Otsu T, Numazu N, Minetti AE, Monte A (2019) Comprehensive mechanical power analysis in sprint running acceleration. Scand J Med Sci Sports 29:1892–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plamondon A, Roy B (1984) Cinématique et cinétique de la course accélérée. Can J Appl Sport Sci 9:42–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh LC (1971) The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of work against horizontal or vertical forces. J Physiol Lond 213:255–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slawinski J, Termoz N, Rabita G, Guilhem G, Dorel S, Morin JB, Samozino P (2017) How 100-m event analyses improve our understanding of world-class men’s and women’s sprint performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 27:45–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Summers RL (1997) Physiology and biophysics of 100-m sprint. News Physiol Sci 12:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ingen Schenau GJ, Jacobs R, de Koning JJ (1991) Can cycle power predict sprint running performance? Eur J Appl Physiol 445:622–628

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ingen Schenau GJ, de Koning JJ, de Groot G (1994) Optimization of sprinting performance in running, cycling and speed skating. Sports Med 17:259–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkov NI, Lapin VI (1979) Analysis of the velocity curve in sprint running. Med Sci Sports 11:332–337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward-Smith AJ, Radford PF (2000) Investigation of the kinetics of anaerobic metabolism by analysis of the performance of elite sprinters. J Biomech 33:997–1004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zamparo P, Pavei G, Nardello F, Bartolini D, Monte A, Minetti AE (2016) Mechanical work and efficiency of 5+5 m shuttle running. Eur J Appl Physiol 116:1911–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamparo P, Pavei G, Monte A, Nardello F, Otsu T, Numazu N, Fujii N, Minetti AE (2019) Mechanical work in shuttle running as a function of speed and distance: implications for power and efficiency. Hum Mov Sci 66:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support of the Lions Club, Udine Duomo, Italy, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PEdP and CO analysed the data and wrote the initial version of the manuscript, the final version of which was edited, revised and approved by all authors. JBM, JS, GP, and PS had previously shown that, during a 100 m sprint, forward acceleration and velocity of the centre of mass are linearly related, thus setting the stage on which the present study is grounded.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristian Osgnach.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflit of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Jean -Rene Lacour.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

di Prampero, P.E., Osgnach, C., Morin, JB. et al. Running at altitude: the 100-m dash. Eur J Appl Physiol 121, 2837–2848 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04752-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04752-y

Keywords

Navigation