Skip to main content
Log in

Suspension training vs. traditional resistance training: effects on muscle mass, strength and functional performance in older adults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We compared the effects of suspension training (ST) with traditional resistance training (TRT) on muscle mass, strength and functional performance in older adults.

Methods

Forty-two untrained older adults were randomized in TRT, ST (both performed 3 sets of whole body exercises to muscle failure) or control group (CON). Muscle thickness (MT) of biceps brachii (MTBB) and vastus lateralis (MTVL), maximal dynamic strength test (1RM) for biceps curl (1RMBC) and leg extension exercises (1RMLE), and functional performance tests (chair stand [CS], timed up and go [TUG] and maximal gait speed [MGS]) were performed before and after 12 weeks of training.

Results

MTBB increased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT 23.35%; ST 21.56%). MTVL increased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT 13.03%; ST 14.07%). 1RMBC increased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT 16.06%; ST 14.33%). 1RMLE increased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT 14.89%; ST 18.06%). MGS increased significantly and similarly for all groups (TRT 6.26%; ST 5.99%; CON 2.87%). CS decreased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT − 20.80%; ST − 15.73%). TUG decreased significantly and similarly for all training groups (TRT − 8.66%; ST − 9.16%).

Conclusion

Suspension training (ST) promotes similar muscle mass, strength and functional performance improvements compared to TRT in older adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

1RM:

Maximal dynamic strength test

1RMBC :

Biceps curl maximal dynamic strength test

1RMLE :

Leg extension maximal dynamic strength test

CON:

Control group

CS:

Chair Stand

CV:

Coefficient of variation

ES:

Effect sizes

MGS:

Maximal gait speed

MT:

Muscle thickness

MTBB :

Biceps brachii muscle thickness

MTVL :

Vastus lateralis muscle thickness

RT:

Resistance training

ST:

Suspension training

TE:

Typical error

TRT:

Traditional resistance training

TUG:

Timed up and go

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the grants provided by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (#2017/05331-6 to VA) and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (#302801/ 2018-9 to CL). We also acknowledge all the subjects who participated in this study and Supley Laboratório de Alimentos e Suplementos Nutricionais (Max Titanium, São Paulo, Brazil) for donating whey protein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: SDS, VA and CAL. Data curation: SDS, DGS, JGAB, VA, RAMJ, NFD and CAL. Formal analysis: SDS, DGS, JGAB, VA and CAL. Investigation: SDS, DGS, JGAB, VA, RAMJ, NFD, MCC and CAL. Methodology: SDS, DGS, JGAB, VA, RAMJ, NFD, MCC and CAL. Project administration: SDS and CAL. Supervision: SDS and CAL. Writing, review and editing: SDS, DGS, JGAB, VA, SRN, MCC and CAL.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cleiton Augusto Libardi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Toshio Moritani.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soligon, S.D., da Silva, D.G., Bergamasco, J.G.A. et al. Suspension training vs. traditional resistance training: effects on muscle mass, strength and functional performance in older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 120, 2223–2232 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04446-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04446-x

Keywords

Navigation