Skip to main content
Log in

The time course of cross-education during short-term isometric strength training

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript



This study examined the time course of contralateral adaptations in maximal isometric strength (MVC), rate of force development (RFD), and rate of electromyographic (EMG) rise (RER) during 4 weeks of unilateral isometric strength training with the non-dominant elbow flexors.


Twenty participants were allocated to strength training (n = 10, three female, two left hand dominant) or control (n = 10, three female, two left hand dominant) groups. Both groups completed testing at baseline and following each week of training to evaluate MVC strength, EMG amplitude, RFD and RER at early (RFD50, RER50) and late (RFD200, RER200) contraction phases for the dominant ‘untrained’ elbow flexors. The training group completed 11 unilateral isometric training sessions across 4 weeks.


The contralateral improvements for MVC strength (P < 0.01) and RFD200 (P = 0.017) were evidenced after 2 weeks, whereas RFD50 (P < 0.01) and RER50 (P = 0.02) showed significant improvements after 3 weeks. Each of the dependent variables was significantly (P < 0.05) greater than baseline values at the end of the training intervention for the trained arm. No changes in any of the variables were observed for the control group (P > 0.10).


Unilateral isometric strength training for 2–3 weeks can produce substantial increases in isometric muscle strength and RFD for both the trained and untrained arms. These data have implications for rehabilitative exercise design and prescription.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others





Maximal voluntary contraction


Rate of EMG rise


Rate of force development


  • Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, Dyhre-Poulsen P (2002) Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol 93:1318–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamson M, MacQuaide N, Helgerud J, Hoff J, Kemi OJ (2008) Unilateral arm strength training improves contralateral peak force and rate of force development. Eur J Appl Physiol 103:553–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen LL, Aagaard P (2006) Influence of maximal muscle strength and intrinsic muscle contractile properties on contractile rate of force development. Eur J Appl Physiol 96:46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen LL, Andersen JL, Zebis MK, Aagaard P (2010) Early and late rate of force development: differential adaptive responses to resistance training? Scand J Med Sci Spor. 1:e162–e169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrushko JW, Gould LA, Farthing JP (2018a) Contralateral effects of unilateral training: sparing of muscle strength and size after immobilization. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrushko JW, Lanovaz JL, Björkman KM, Kontulainen SA, Farthing JP (2018b) Unilateral strength training leads to muscle-specific sparing effects during opposite homologous limb immobilization. J Appl Physiol 124:866–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry BK, Warman GE, Carson RG (2005) Age-related differences in rapid muscle activation after rate of force development training of the elbow flexors. Exp Brain Res 162:122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barss TS, Klarner T, Pearcey GE, Sun Y, Zehr EP (2018) Time course of inter-limb strength transfer after unilateral handgrip training. J Appl Physiol 125(5):1594–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck TW (2013) The importance of a priori sample size estimation in strength and conditioning research. J Strength Cond Res 27:2323–2337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behm DG, Sale DG (1993) Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response. J Appl Physiol 74:359–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blazevich AJ, Horne S, Cannavan D, Coleman DR, Aagaard P (2008) Effect of contraction mode of slow-speed resistance training on the maximum rate of force development in the human quadriceps. Muscle Nerve 38:1046–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyes NG, Yee P, Lanovaz JL, Farthing JP (2017) Cross-education after high-frequency versus low-frequency volume-matched handgrip training. Muscle Nerve 56:689–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AB, McCartney N, Sale DG (1990) Positive adaptations to weight-lifting training in the elderly. J Appl Physiol 69:1725–1733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins BW, Lockyer EJ, Button DC (2017) Prescribing cross-education of strength: is it time? Muscle Nerve 56:684–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs TA, Frazer AK, Horvath DM, Pearce AJ, Howatson G, Kidgell DJ (2016) Cross-education of wrist extensor strength is not influenced by non-dominant training in right-handers. Eur J Appl Physiol 116:1757–1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Balso C, Cafarelli E (2007) Adaptations in the activation of human skeletal muscle induced by short-term isometric resistance training. J Appl Physiol 103:402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragert K, Zehr EP (2013) High-intensity unilateral dorsiflexor resistance training results in bilateral neuromuscular plasticity after stroke. Exp Brain Res 225:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole KT, Housh TJ, Johnson GO, Perry SR, Bull AJ, Cramer JT (2002) Mechanomyographic and electromyographic responses to unilateral isometric training. J Strength Cond Res 16:192–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farthing JP (2009) Cross-education of strength depends on limb dominance: implications for theory and application. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 37:179–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farthing JP, Chilibeck PD (2003) The effects of eccentric and concentric training at different velocities on muscle hypertrophy. Eur J Appl Physiol 89:578–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farthing JP, Borowsky R, Chilibeck PD, Binsted G, Sarty GE (2007) Neuro-physiological adaptations associated with cross-education of strength. Brain Topogr 20:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farthing JP, Krentz JR, Magnus CR (2009) Strength training the free limb attenuates strength loss during unilateral immobilization. J Appl Physiol 106:830–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green LA, Gabriel DA (2018a) The cross education of strength and skill following unilateral strength training in the upper and lower limbs. J Neurophysiol.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Green LA, Gabriel DA (2018b) The effect of unilateral training on contralateral limb strength in young, older, and patient populations: a meta-analysis of cross education. Phys Ther Rev 1:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendy AM, Spittle M, Kidgell DJ (2012) Cross education and immobilisation: mechanisms and implications for injury rehabilitation. J Sci Med Sport 15:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Stegeman D, Blok J, Rau G, Disselhorst-Klug C, Hägg G (1999) European recommendations for surface electromyography. RRD, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester GM, Pope ZK, Magrini MA, Colquhoun RJ, Curiel AB, Estrada CA, Olmos AA, DeFreitas JM (2018) Age does not attenuate maximal velocity adaptations in the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs during unilateral resistance training. J Aging Phys Activ 1:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston ME, Froese EA, St PV, Green HJ, Ranney DA (1983) Muscle performance, morphology and metabolic capacity during strength training and detraining: a one leg model. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 51(1):25–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keppel G (1991) Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim CY, Lee JS, Kim HD, Kim JS (2015) The effect of progressive task-oriented training on a supplementary tilt table on lower extremity muscle strength and gait recovery in patients with hemiplegic stroke. Gait Posture 41:425–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komi PV, Viitasalo JT, Rauramaa R, Vihko V (1978) Effect of isometric strength training on mechanical, electrical, and metabolic aspects of muscle function. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 40:45–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Gandevia SC, Carroll TJ (2009) Unilateral strength training increases voluntary activation of the opposite untrained limb. Clin Neurophysiol 120:802–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Hinder MR, Gandevia SC, Carroll TJ (2010) The ipsilateral motor cortex contributes to cross-limb transfer of performance gains after ballistic motor practice. J Physiol 588:201–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maffiuletti NA, Aagaard P, Blazevich AJ, Folland J, Tillin N, Duchateau J (2016) Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations. Eur J Appl Physiol 116(6):1091–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnus CR, Arnold CM, Johnston G, Haas VDB, Basran J, Krentz JR, Farthing JP (2013) Cross-education for improving strength and mobility after distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94(7):1247–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manca A, Hortobágyi T, Rothwell JC, Deriu F (2018) Neurophysiological adaptations in the untrained side in conjunction with cross-education of muscle strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol 124:1502–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritani T, deVries HA (1979) Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med 58(3):115–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Narici MV, Roi GS, Landoni L, Minetti AE, Cerretelli P (1989) Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 59:310–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen H, Walker S, Hackney AC, Avela J, Häkkinen K (2018) Increased rate of force development during periodized maximum strength and power training is highly individual. Eur J Appl Physiol 118:1033–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddy KL, Carson RG (2013) Neural pathways mediating cross education of motor function. Front Hum Neurosci 7:397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddy KL, Rudolf AK, Kalkman B, King M, Daffertshofer A, Carroll TJ, Carson RG (2016) Neural adaptations associated with interlimb transfer in a ballistic wrist flexion task. Front Hum Neurosci 10:204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddy KL, Leemans A, Woolley DG, Wenderoth N, Carson RG (2017) Structural and functional cortical connectivity mediating cross education of motor function. J Neurosci 37:2555–2564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scripture EW, Smith TL, Brown EM (1894) On the education of muscular control and power. Stud Yale Psychol Lab 2:114–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JP (2007) Intermediate Statistics, 3rd edn. Taylor & Francis Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Ledwell NM, Boyd LA, Zehr EP (2018) Unilateral wrist extension training after stroke improves strength and neural plasticity in both arms. Exp Brain Res. 237:1–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tillin NA, Pain MT, Folland JP (2012) Short-term training for explosive strength causes neural and mechanical adaptations. Exp Physiol 97:630–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Cutsem M, Duchateau J, Hainaut K (1998) Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. J Physiol 513:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir JP (2005) Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19:231–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

JC and XY conceived and designed the study. JD wrote the software for data analysis and created the figures. JC conducted experiments, analyzed data, and drafted the first version of the manuscript. XY, MS, MB, and JD critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua C. Carr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Toshio Moritani.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carr, J.C., Ye, X., Stock, M.S. et al. The time course of cross-education during short-term isometric strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 119, 1395–1407 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: